• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男性健康网站资源分析

Men's health on the web: an analysis of current resources.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Austin Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Young Urology Researchers Organisation (YURO), Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2019 Jun;37(6):1043-1047. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02670-5. Epub 2019 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-019-02670-5
PMID:30756151
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Men's health research covers a broad range of topics. Men and women face different barriers to health, with men almost universally having a lower life expectancy than women. Access to high-quality information on men's health topics is potentially an important part of engaging men with medical services. We aim to assess the quality of men's health resources available on the internet across 4 developed countries using a tier-based rating system as well as the World Health Organisation Health on the Net (HON) standards.

METHODS

The Google search engine imbedded with the Health on the Net toolbar was used to assess 357 websites across Australia, Canada, America and United Kingdom using the search term 'men's health'. The websites were further subdivided into 3 tiers by 2 independent investigators, with tier 1 websites defined as government or health organisation sponsored, tier 2 websites defined as being sponsored by health services such as private clinics and insurance providers, and tier 3 websites being websites that did not meet criteria for the first 2 tiers.

RESULTS

Overall, 28% of websites were rated as tier 1, 26% as tier 2 and 46% as tier 3. The HONcode accreditation was overall 39% of tier 1 websites. The majority of websites reviewed were in the tier 3 category, and 35% of overall websites being non-health or non-medically related.

DISCUSSION

The lack of 'relevant' and HONcode-accredited websites relating to men's health should be appreciated by health care professionals.

摘要

简介

男性健康研究涵盖了广泛的主题。男性和女性面临不同的健康障碍,男性的预期寿命几乎普遍低于女性。获得高质量的男性健康主题信息可能是吸引男性使用医疗服务的重要组成部分。我们旨在使用基于层次的评级系统以及世界卫生组织的健康网络(HON)标准,评估 4 个发达国家互联网上男性健康资源的质量。

方法

使用嵌入 Health on the Net 工具栏的 Google 搜索引擎,使用搜索词“men's health”评估澳大利亚、加拿大、美国和英国的 357 个网站。这些网站由 2 名独立研究人员进一步细分为 3 个层次,第 1 层次的网站定义为政府或健康组织赞助的网站,第 2 层次的网站定义为私人诊所和保险公司等健康服务赞助的网站,第 3 层次的网站是不符合前 2 个层次标准的网站。

结果

总体而言,28%的网站被评为第 1 层次,26%的网站被评为第 2 层次,46%的网站被评为第 3 层次。HONcode 认证总体上占第 1 层次网站的 39%。审查的大多数网站都属于第 3 层次类别,而 35%的网站总体上与健康或医学无关。

讨论

医疗保健专业人员应该意识到,缺乏与男性健康相关的“相关”和 HONcode 认证网站。

相似文献

1
Men's health on the web: an analysis of current resources.男性健康网站资源分析
World J Urol. 2019 Jun;37(6):1043-1047. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02670-5. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
2
Penile cancer information on the internet: a needle in a haystack.网上的阴茎癌信息:大海捞针。
BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122 Suppl 5:22-26. doi: 10.1111/bju.14532. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
3
Knowledge translation in men's health research: development and delivery of content for use online.男性健康研究中的知识转化:在线使用内容的开发与提供
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 29;17(1):e31. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3881.
4
Female urinary incontinence health information quality on the Internet: a multilingual evaluation.互联网上女性尿失禁健康信息的质量:多语言评估
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jan;27(1):69-76. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2742-5. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
5
Social Media and Men's Health: A Content Analysis of Twitter Conversations During the 2013 Movember Campaigns in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.社交媒体与男性健康:对美国、加拿大和英国2013年“胡须月”活动期间推特对话的内容分析
Am J Mens Health. 2017 Nov;11(6):1627-1641. doi: 10.1177/1557988315617826. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
6
Cannabis and male sexual health: contemporary qualitative review and insight into perspectives of young men on the internet.大麻与男性性健康:当代质性综述及对年轻男性网络观点的洞察
Sex Med Rev. 2023 Apr 3;11(2):139-150. doi: 10.1093/sxmrev/qeac010.
7
Community-based Men's Sheds: promoting male health, wellbeing and social inclusion in an international context.基于社区的男性活动中心:在国际背景下促进男性健康、福祉和社会包容。
Health Promot Int. 2014 Sep;29(3):483-93. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat033. Epub 2013 May 6.
8
Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.基于互联网的资源经常提供关于术前禁食的不准确和过时的建议:一项系统综述。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Dec;123(6):1463-1468. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001590.
9
Young men's health promotion and new information communication technologies: illuminating the issues and research agendas.青年男性健康促进与新信息通信技术:揭示问题与研究议程。
Health Promot Int. 2010 Sep;25(3):363-70. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daq022. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
10
An Online Investigation Into Direct-to-Consumer Men's Health Clinics: The Who, What, and Where.一项针对直接面向消费者的男性健康诊所的在线调查:相关人员、业务内容及地点
Urology. 2023 Apr;174:135-140. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.01.026. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Sentiment Analysis of Tweets as a New Tool to Measure Public Perception of Male Erectile and Ejaculatory Dysfunctions.将推文进行情感分析作为衡量公众对男性勃起功能障碍和射精功能障碍认知的新工具。
Sex Med. 2019 Dec;7(4):464-471. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
2
Topic issue: men's health in 2019.专题:2019年男性健康
World J Urol. 2019 Jun;37(6):989-990. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02794-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Vision and Strategies for Men's Health Research in an Aging Society.老龄化社会中男性健康研究的愿景与策略
World J Mens Health. 2018 Sep;36(3):173-175. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.180044.
2
Assessment of readability, quality and popularity of online information on ureteral stents.输尿管支架相关网络信息的可读性、质量和普及度评估。
World J Urol. 2018 Jun;36(6):985-992. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2179-9. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
3
Changing Men's Health: Leading the Future.改变男性健康:引领未来。
World J Mens Health. 2018 Jan;36(1):1-3. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.18101.
4
Health Information Seeking, Source Trust, and Culture: A Comparative Analysis of Health Information Trends and Needs Between Guam and the United States.健康信息寻求、来源信任与文化:关岛与美国之间健康信息趋势和需求的比较分析
J Health Commun. 2016;21(4):469-78. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1095822. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
5
Twentieth century surge of excess adult male mortality.二十世纪成年男性超额死亡率的激增。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jul 21;112(29):8993-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1421942112. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
6
Health information quality on the internet in urological oncology: a multilingual longitudinal evaluation.泌尿外科肿瘤学领域互联网上的健康信息质量:多语言纵向评估
Urology. 2009 Nov;74(5):1058-63. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.091. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
7
Machine learning approach for automatic quality criteria detection of health web pages.用于自动检测健康网页质量标准的机器学习方法。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 1):705-9.
8
The World Health Report 2006: working together for health.《2006年世界卫生报告:共同努力增进健康》
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2006 Nov;19(3):385-7. doi: 10.1080/13576280600937911.
9
Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review.评估万维网上面向消费者的健康信息质量的实证研究:一项系统综述。
JAMA. 2002;287(20):2691-700. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.20.2691.
10
How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews.消费者如何在万维网上搜索和评估健康信息?采用焦点小组、可用性测试和深度访谈的定性研究。
BMJ. 2002 Mar 9;324(7337):573-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.573.