Suppr超能文献

利福平或利福布汀用于结核病合并艾滋病的治疗:疗效有差异吗?

Tuberculosis-HIV treatment with rifampicin or rifabutin: are the outcomes different?

作者信息

Schmaltz Carolina Arana Stanis, Demitto Fernanda de Oliveira, Sant'Anna Flavia Marinho, Rolla Valeria Cavalcanti

机构信息

Fundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Laboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em Micobactérias, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

出版信息

Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2019 Feb 11;114:e180420. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760180420.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rifamycins are a group of antibiotics mainly used in the treatment of tuberculosis (TB), however they interact with antiretroviral therapy (ART). Rifabutin allows more regimens options for concomitant imunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment compared to rifampicin.

OBJECTIVE

Compare the outcomes of TB-HIV co-infected patients who used rifampicin or rifabutin.

METHODS

We analysed data from a prospective cohort study at National Institute of Infectious Diseases Evandro Chagas, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil. Patients who were treated for TB and HIV with rifampicin or rifabutin, from February 2011 to September 2016 were included.

FINDINGS

There were 130 TB-HIV patients, of whom 102 were treated with rifampicin and 28 with rifabutin. All patients in the rifabutin-treated group and 55% of the rifampicin-treated group patients were ART-experienced. Patients treated with rifampicin had similar abandon and cure rates, interruptions in treatment due to adverse reactions, immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome and a similar mortality rate as those treated with rifabutin. However, rifampicin-treated patients had higher CD4 counts and more frequently undetectable HIV viral load by the end of treatment (67% versus 18%, p < 0.001) compared to rifabutin-treated patients, even when only ART-experienced patients were evaluated (66,6% versus 36,3%, p = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who used rifabutin had worst immune and virological control. This group had more ART-experienced patients. New and simpler regimens are needed for patients who do not respond to previous antiretroviral therapies.

摘要

背景

利福霉素是一类主要用于治疗结核病(TB)的抗生素,然而它们会与抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)相互作用。与利福平相比,利福布汀为合并免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染的患者提供了更多的联合治疗方案选择。

目的

比较使用利福平或利福布汀的结核合并HIV感染患者的治疗结果。

方法

我们分析了巴西里约热内卢埃万德罗·查加斯国家传染病研究所一项前瞻性队列研究的数据。纳入了2011年2月至2016年9月期间接受利福平或利福布汀治疗结核病和HIV的患者。

结果

共有130例结核合并HIV感染患者,其中102例接受利福平治疗,28例接受利福布汀治疗。利福布汀治疗组的所有患者以及利福平治疗组55%的患者都有抗逆转录病毒治疗经验。接受利福平治疗的患者在治疗放弃率、治愈率、因不良反应导致的治疗中断、免疫重建炎症综合征以及死亡率方面与接受利福布汀治疗的患者相似。然而,与利福布汀治疗的患者相比,利福平治疗的患者在治疗结束时CD4细胞计数更高,HIV病毒载量更频繁地检测不到(67%对18%,p<0.001),即使仅评估有抗逆转录病毒治疗经验的患者也是如此(66.6%对36.3%,p = 0.039)。

结论

使用利福布汀的患者免疫和病毒学控制较差。该组有更多有抗逆转录病毒治疗经验的患者。对于对先前抗逆转录病毒疗法无反应的患者,需要新的更简单的治疗方案。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验