Key Laboratory of Drinking Water Science and Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng, Jiangsu Province 224051, China.
Key Laboratory of Drinking Water Science and Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100019, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 25;653:1186-1191. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.062. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
Revealing the main contributors to septic odor is a challenge since diverse compounds are responsible for this odor, and there might exist synergistic effects among different odorants. In this study, based on a reconstitution evaluation, the contribution of eighteen odorants identified in Huangpu River source water to the septic odor was explored. The reconstitution test result showed that the three typical odorants, including bis(2‑chloroisopropyl) ether (BCIE), diethyl disulfide (DEDS) and dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), with respective average odor activity values (OAVs) of 2.35, 1.65 and 0.78, only contributed 61 ± 3% of the FPA intensity for septic odor in Huangpu source water. At a BCIE concentration of 50 ng/L, synergistic effect for the septic odor occurred at 10 ng/L for geosmin and 20 ng/L for 2‑methylisoborneol (MIB), showing that coexisting musty odorants could enhance the septic odor intensity caused by some typical odorants. When both geosmin and MIB, with an average OAV of 4.54 and 1.38, were further included in addition to the three typical odorants, 88 ± 4% of the septic odor in Huangpu River source water could be explained. With addition of the remaining odorants with much lower OAVs (<0.23), 94 ± 2% of the septic odor could be explained. The musty odor was not affected by the presence of the co-existing odorants at the concentration levels of the present study. This study indicated that the overall odor of water contaminated with musty and septic odorants is a combination of both concentrations of individual contaminants and their synergistic effects. This is the first study to reveal the synergistic effects of typical musty odorants on septic odor, and the results of this study demonstrated that the synergistic effects of other odorants should be considered when dealing with the septic odor in drinking water.
揭示导致污水臭味的主要贡献者是一项挑战,因为有多种化合物负责这种气味,并且不同的气味物质之间可能存在协同作用。在这项研究中,基于重建评估,探索了在黄浦江水源水中鉴定出的十八种气味物质对污水臭味的贡献。重建测试结果表明,三种典型气味物质,包括双(2-氯异丙基)醚(BCIE)、二乙基二硫醚(DEDS)和二甲基二硫醚(DMDS),平均气味活度值(OAV)分别为 2.35、1.65 和 0.78,仅对黄浦源水中污水臭味的 FPA 强度贡献了 61±3%。在 BCIE 浓度为 50ng/L 时,当共存的土霉味物质在 10ng/L 时出现 geosmin 和 20ng/L 时出现 2-甲基异莰醇(MIB)的协同作用时,表明共存的土霉味物质会增强某些典型气味物质引起的污水臭味强度。当将平均 OAV 分别为 4.54 和 1.38 的土霉味物质 geosmin 和 MIB 进一步添加到三种典型气味物质中时,可以解释黄浦江水源水中 88±4%的污水臭味。再加上其余 OAV 值(<0.23)低得多的气味物质,可解释 94±2%的污水臭味。在本研究的浓度水平下,土霉味不受共存气味物质的影响。这项研究表明,受土霉味和污水味物质污染的水的总体气味是单个污染物浓度及其协同作用的结合。这是首次揭示典型土霉味物质对污水臭味的协同作用的研究,研究结果表明,在处理饮用水中的污水臭味时,应考虑其他气味物质的协同作用。