Berg H C
Department of Cellular and Developmental Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138.
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1988;53 Pt 1:1-9. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1988.053.01.003.
What is distinctive about bacterial chemotaxis, as compared to, for example, taste in the elephant, is the time over which decisions must be made. The lower limit is set by diffusion of chemicals to and from the cell surface, which demands long times for statistically significant counts. The upper limit is set by diffusion of the cell itself, which demands short times for well-defined swimming paths. For an organism the size of E. coli, temporal comparisons of the concentrations of chemicals in the environment must be made within a few seconds. Although such short time spans might be difficult for the biochemist, they are not so difficult for E. coli, because diffusion can carry a small molecule across the cell in about 1 msec. E. coli has the opposite problem: How does it integrate inputs from many receptors over periods 1000 times as long? The mechanisms for this signal processing are beginning to be understood. We know how most chemical attractants are identified, how temporal comparisons might be made, and how the behavioral output is effected. We know less about how sensory information crosses the cytoplasmic membrane, how the reactions that link the receptors to the flagella generate such high gain, and what actually controls the direction of flagellar rotation. One thing is quite clear: E. coli demands our admiration and respect.
与例如大象的味觉相比,细菌趋化性的独特之处在于做出决策所需的时间。下限由化学物质在细胞表面的进出扩散设定,这需要很长时间才能获得具有统计学意义的计数。上限由细胞自身的扩散设定,这需要短时间来形成明确的游动路径。对于大肠杆菌这种大小的生物体,必须在几秒钟内对环境中化学物质的浓度进行时间上的比较。尽管如此短的时间跨度对生物化学家来说可能很困难,但对大肠杆菌来说并非如此,因为扩散可以在大约1毫秒内将一个小分子带过细胞。大肠杆菌面临相反的问题:它如何在长达1000倍的时间内整合来自许多受体的输入?这种信号处理的机制正开始被理解。我们知道大多数化学引诱剂是如何被识别的,如何进行时间比较,以及行为输出是如何产生的。我们对感觉信息如何穿过细胞质膜、将受体与鞭毛连接起来的反应如何产生如此高的增益,以及实际上是什么控制鞭毛旋转方向了解得较少。有一点很清楚:大肠杆菌值得我们赞赏和尊重。