University of Central Florida.
Am Psychol. 2019 Feb-Mar;74(2):248-249. doi: 10.1037/amp0000363.
The recent article "Compelled Disclosure of College Sexual Assault" (Holland, Cortina, & Freyd, 2018) documents the variability in how campuses define responsible employees, reviews the assumptions underlying compelled disclosure, and offers alternatives to compelled disclosure. Compelled disclosure conflicts with several of the general principles of the American Psychological Association's (2016) ethics code and, as a result, is likely to conflict with the values of many psychologists. In this response, the ethical conflicts are identified and recommendations to psychologists to address these conflicts are offered. Specifically, psychologists should take an active role in learning about their campus policy, identify methods to increase student knowledge of their disclosure requirements, consider ways of reminding students of their disclosure requirements if they believe a student is likely to make a disclosure, advocate to campus authorities to ensure appropriate roles are designated as confidential, and respond to the need for more research in this area to help inform policy change and increase student support. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
最近的一篇文章“高校性侵案件的强制披露”(Holland、Cortina 和 Freyd,2018)记录了校园如何定义有责任的员工的多样性,回顾了强制披露的基本假设,并提供了强制披露的替代方案。强制披露与美国心理协会(2016 年)道德准则的几个一般原则相冲突,因此可能与许多心理学家的价值观相冲突。在这个回应中,确定了伦理冲突,并向心理学家提出了解决这些冲突的建议。具体来说,心理学家应该积极了解他们所在校园的政策,找到增加学生对披露要求了解的方法,如果他们认为学生可能会披露,考虑提醒学生披露要求的方法,倡导校园当局确保指定适当的角色为保密,并回应在这一领域进行更多研究的需求,以帮助告知政策的改变和增加对学生的支持。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。