Suppr超能文献

分娩辅助人员类型和分娩地点与围产儿结局的关系。

Association between birth attendant type and delivery site and perinatal outcomes.

机构信息

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 May;145(2):187-192. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12786. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that modified perinatal mortality, early neonatal mortality, and other measures of perinatal mortality are lower with facility births than with home births among deliveries conducted by traditional birth attendants (TBAs) or nurse-midwives.

METHOD

This population-based observational study used data collected prospectively for home and facility deliveries conducted by TBAs and nurse-midwives in 13 rural communities in Zambia between September 1, 2009, and December 31, 2015.

RESULTS

We enrolled 48 956 pregnant women. In adjusted analysis, modified perinatal mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.88), early neonatal mortality (0.48, 0.33-0.69), and fresh stillbirth/day-1 neonatal mortality (0.55, 0.38-0.80) were lower among home deliveries than among facility deliveries conducted by TBAs, but did not differ among deliveries conducted by nurse-midwives. Rates of fresh stillbirth did not differ between home and facility delivery by either TBAs (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 0.64-1.66) or nurse-midwives (1.19, 0.67-2.10).

CONCLUSION

Our findings show significant reductions in modified perinatal mortality, early neonatal mortality, and fresh stillbirth/day-1 neonatal mortality among home deliveries done by TBAs. This may be explained by robust community structures built by our program and referral bias of complicated cases.

摘要

目的

检验以下假设,即与传统助产妇或助产士在医疗机构进行的分娩相比,传统助产妇或助产士在家庭环境中进行的分娩,其改良围产儿死亡率、早期新生儿死亡率和其他围产儿死亡率指标更低。

方法

本基于人群的观察性研究使用了 2009 年 9 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间在赞比亚 13 个农村社区中由传统助产妇和助产士进行的家庭和机构分娩前瞻性收集的数据。

结果

我们纳入了 48956 名孕妇。在调整分析中,家庭分娩的改良围产儿死亡率(调整后的优势比[aOR]0.63,95%置信区间[CI]0.45-0.88)、早期新生儿死亡率(0.48,0.33-0.69)和新鲜死产/第 1 天新生儿死亡率(0.55,0.38-0.80)均低于传统助产妇在医疗机构进行的分娩,但由助产士进行的分娩中并无差异。家庭分娩和医疗机构分娩的新鲜死产率在传统助产妇(aOR 1.03,95%CI 0.64-1.66)或助产士(1.19,0.67-2.10)中均无差异。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,传统助产妇在家中进行的分娩可显著降低改良围产儿死亡率、早期新生儿死亡率和新鲜死产/第 1 天新生儿死亡率。这可能是由于我们的项目建立了强大的社区结构以及复杂病例的转诊偏倚导致的。

相似文献

7
Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States.美国计划在家分娩的围产期风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;212(3):350.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
10
Place of delivery and perinatal mortality in Kenya.肯尼亚的分娩地点和围产儿死亡率。
Semin Perinatol. 2019 Aug;43(5):252-259. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2019.03.014. Epub 2019 Mar 16.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验