• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association between birth attendant type and delivery site and perinatal outcomes.分娩辅助人员类型和分娩地点与围产儿结局的关系。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 May;145(2):187-192. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12786. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
2
Neonatal mortality in the United States is related to location of birth (hospital versus home) rather than the type of birth attendant.美国的新生儿死亡率与出生地点(医院与家庭)有关,而与分娩助手的类型无关。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):254.e1-254.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.045. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
3
Exploring women and traditional birth attendants' perceptions and experiences of stillbirths in district Thatta, Sindh, Pakistan: a qualitative study.巴基斯坦信德省达塔地区的女性和传统助产士对死产的认知和体验的探索性研究:一项定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2020 Jan 13;17(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-0852-0.
4
Reasons for home delivery and use of traditional birth attendants in rural Zambia: a qualitative study.赞比亚农村地区家庭分娩及使用传统助产士的原因:一项定性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Sep 11;15:216. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0652-7.
5
mHealth intervention to improve the continuum of maternal and perinatal care in rural Guatemala: a pragmatic, randomized controlled feasibility trial.移动医疗干预改善危地马拉农村地区孕产妇和围产保健连续性:一项实用、随机对照可行性试验。
Reprod Health. 2018 Jul 4;15(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0554-z.
6
Factors influencing adoption of facility-assisted delivery - a qualitative study of women and other stakeholders in a Maasai community in Ngorongoro District, Tanzania.影响设施辅助分娩采用的因素——坦桑尼亚恩戈罗恩戈罗区马赛社区妇女和其他利益攸关方的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Feb 12;20(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2728-2.
7
Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States.美国计划在家分娩的围产期风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;212(3):350.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
8
Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.独立助产士在分娩中心和家中分娩的结局:日本的一项回顾性队列研究。
Midwifery. 2013 Aug;29(8):965-72. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
9
Does facility birth reduce maternal and perinatal mortality in Brong Ahafo, Ghana? A secondary analysis using data on 119 244 pregnancies from two cluster-randomised controlled trials.在加纳布隆阿哈福地区,医院分娩是否能降低产妇和围产儿死亡率?两项整群随机对照试验中 119244 例妊娠的二次分析结果
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Aug;7(8):e1074-e1087. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30165-2.
10
Place of delivery and perinatal mortality in Kenya.肯尼亚的分娩地点和围产儿死亡率。
Semin Perinatol. 2019 Aug;43(5):252-259. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2019.03.014. Epub 2019 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Safe birth in cultural safety in southern Mexico: a pragmatic non-inferiority cluster-randomised controlled trial.墨西哥南部文化安全条件下的安全分娩:一项实用型非劣效性整群随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jan 17;22(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04344-w.
2
Community-Based Health Planning and Services Plus programme in Ghana: A qualitative study with stakeholders in two Systems Learning Districts on improving the implementation of primary health care.加纳社区卫生规划和服务加强方案:在两个系统学习区与利益攸关方进行的一项定性研究,旨在改进初级卫生保健的实施。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 8;15(1):e0226808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226808. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Global, regional, national, and selected subnational levels of stillbirths, neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality, 1980-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.1980 - 2015年全球、区域、国家及部分国家以下各级死产、新生儿、婴儿及5岁以下儿童死亡率:全球疾病负担研究2015的系统分析
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1725-1774. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31575-6.
2
The Global Network Maternal Newborn Health Registry: a multi-national, community-based registry of pregnancy outcomes.全球孕产妇与新生儿健康登记处:一个基于社区的跨国妊娠结局登记处。
Reprod Health. 2015;12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S1. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-12-S2-S1. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
3
Personal and environmental predictors of the intention to use maternal healthcare services in Kalomo, Zambia.赞比亚卡洛莫地区孕产妇保健服务使用意愿的个人及环境预测因素
Health Educ Res. 2014 Dec;29(6):1028-40. doi: 10.1093/her/cyu057. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
4
Maternal and perinatal mortality by place of delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies.撒哈拉以南非洲地区分娩地点与孕产妇和围产期死亡率:基于人群队列研究的荟萃分析
BMC Public Health. 2014 Sep 28;14:1014. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1014.
5
A regional multilevel analysis: can skilled birth attendants uniformly decrease neonatal mortality?区域性多层次分析:熟练接生员能否统一降低新生儿死亡率?
Matern Child Health J. 2014 Jan;18(1):242-249. doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1260-7.
6
Delivering at home or in a health facility? health-seeking behaviour of women and the role of traditional birth attendants in Tanzania.在家分娩还是在医疗机构分娩?坦桑尼亚妇女的就医行为和传统接生员的作用。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Feb 28;13:55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-55.
7
Health worker perspectives on user fee removal in Zambia.赞比亚卫生工作者对取消用户付费的看法。
Hum Resour Health. 2012 Oct 30;10:40. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-10-40.
8
Newborn survival: a multi-country analysis of a decade of change.新生儿存活率:十年变迁的多国分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Jul;27 Suppl 3:iii6-28. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs053.
9
Effect of training traditional birth attendants on neonatal mortality (Lufwanyama Neonatal Survival Project): randomised controlled study.传统接生员培训对新生儿死亡率的影响(卢法亚新生儿生存项目):随机对照研究。
BMJ. 2011 Feb 3;342:d346. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d346.
10
Reducing intrapartum-related neonatal deaths in low- and middle-income countries-what works?降低中低收入国家产时相关新生儿死亡——什么方法有效?
Semin Perinatol. 2010 Dec;34(6):395-407. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.09.009.

分娩辅助人员类型和分娩地点与围产儿结局的关系。

Association between birth attendant type and delivery site and perinatal outcomes.

机构信息

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 May;145(2):187-192. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12786. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1002/ijgo.12786
PMID:30763454
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7868173/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that modified perinatal mortality, early neonatal mortality, and other measures of perinatal mortality are lower with facility births than with home births among deliveries conducted by traditional birth attendants (TBAs) or nurse-midwives.

METHOD

This population-based observational study used data collected prospectively for home and facility deliveries conducted by TBAs and nurse-midwives in 13 rural communities in Zambia between September 1, 2009, and December 31, 2015.

RESULTS

We enrolled 48 956 pregnant women. In adjusted analysis, modified perinatal mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.88), early neonatal mortality (0.48, 0.33-0.69), and fresh stillbirth/day-1 neonatal mortality (0.55, 0.38-0.80) were lower among home deliveries than among facility deliveries conducted by TBAs, but did not differ among deliveries conducted by nurse-midwives. Rates of fresh stillbirth did not differ between home and facility delivery by either TBAs (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 0.64-1.66) or nurse-midwives (1.19, 0.67-2.10).

CONCLUSION

Our findings show significant reductions in modified perinatal mortality, early neonatal mortality, and fresh stillbirth/day-1 neonatal mortality among home deliveries done by TBAs. This may be explained by robust community structures built by our program and referral bias of complicated cases.

摘要

目的

检验以下假设,即与传统助产妇或助产士在医疗机构进行的分娩相比,传统助产妇或助产士在家庭环境中进行的分娩,其改良围产儿死亡率、早期新生儿死亡率和其他围产儿死亡率指标更低。

方法

本基于人群的观察性研究使用了 2009 年 9 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间在赞比亚 13 个农村社区中由传统助产妇和助产士进行的家庭和机构分娩前瞻性收集的数据。

结果

我们纳入了 48956 名孕妇。在调整分析中,家庭分娩的改良围产儿死亡率(调整后的优势比[aOR]0.63,95%置信区间[CI]0.45-0.88)、早期新生儿死亡率(0.48,0.33-0.69)和新鲜死产/第 1 天新生儿死亡率(0.55,0.38-0.80)均低于传统助产妇在医疗机构进行的分娩,但由助产士进行的分娩中并无差异。家庭分娩和医疗机构分娩的新鲜死产率在传统助产妇(aOR 1.03,95%CI 0.64-1.66)或助产士(1.19,0.67-2.10)中均无差异。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,传统助产妇在家中进行的分娩可显著降低改良围产儿死亡率、早期新生儿死亡率和新鲜死产/第 1 天新生儿死亡率。这可能是由于我们的项目建立了强大的社区结构以及复杂病例的转诊偏倚导致的。