Suppr超能文献

中国双相情感障碍患者在躁狂或轻躁狂、抑郁和缓解状态下主观和客观认知功能之间的关联。

The associations between subjective and objective cognitive functioning across manic or hypomanic, depressed, and euthymic states in Chinese bipolar patients.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510078, China.

Department of Psychiatry, Xiamen Xianyue Hospital, Xiamen 361012, China.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2019 Apr 15;249:73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.02.025. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients may present cognitive deficits during all stages of bipolar disorder (BD). Few studies have examined self-reported cognitive difficulties and its relation to neurocognitive dysfunction during symptomatic periods of BD. This study aimed to compare subjective cognitive functioning and explore associations between subjective and objective cognitive functioning across different BD clinical states, and investigate the predicting and moderating roles of mood symptoms.

METHODS

Subjective cognitive functioning (measured by Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessment, COBRA) and several domains of cognitive functioning (assessed by a neuropsychological battery), including executive functions, attention and processing speed, and visual memory, were examined in 48 hypomanic or manic patients, 42 depressed bipolar patients, 50 euthymic bipolar patients and 60 healthy comparisons.

RESULTS

All patients exhibited subjective and objective cognitive deficits in relation to healthy comparisons. There was a significant association between subjective and objective cognitive functioning in euthymic group, but the association was not significant in acute symptomatic groups, which could be moderated by depressive or manic symptoms in depressive or manic group, respectively. Subjective cognitive functioning was significantly correlated with mood symptoms, and the best predictor of subjective cognitive functioning was depressive symptoms.

LIMITATIONS

This was a cross-sectional study with a mixed sample of inpatients and outpatients. The medication effect was not adjusted.

CONCLUSIONS

The associations between subjective and objective cognitive dysfunction varied in clinical states, and mood symptoms moderated the associations. A neuropsychological test battery is required to substantiate actual cognitive dysfunction in clinical settings, irrespective of subjective cognitive deficits.

摘要

背景

患者在双相情感障碍(BD)的所有阶段都可能出现认知缺陷。很少有研究检查过有症状的 BD 期间自我报告的认知困难及其与神经认知功能障碍的关系。本研究旨在比较主观认知功能,并探讨不同 BD 临床状态下主观和客观认知功能之间的关联,以及探究情绪症状的预测和调节作用。

方法

主观认知功能(通过双相情感障碍认知抱怨评定量表,COBRA 进行测量)和认知功能的几个领域(通过神经心理学测试进行评估),包括执行功能、注意力和处理速度以及视觉记忆,在 48 名轻躁狂或躁狂患者、42 名抑郁双相情感障碍患者、50 名双相情感障碍患者和 60 名健康对照组中进行了检查。

结果

所有患者与健康对照组相比均表现出主观和客观认知缺陷。在稳定期组中,主观认知功能与客观认知功能之间存在显著关联,但在急性症状组中,这种关联不显著,在抑郁组或躁狂组中,分别由抑郁症状或躁狂症状调节。主观认知功能与情绪症状显著相关,主观认知功能的最佳预测因素是抑郁症状。

局限性

这是一项横断面研究,样本包括住院患者和门诊患者。未调整药物作用。

结论

主观和客观认知功能障碍之间的关联在临床状态中有所不同,情绪症状调节了这些关联。在临床环境中,需要神经心理学测试来证实实际的认知功能障碍,而不仅仅是主观认知缺陷。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验