• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《儿童体力活动问卷(PAQ-C)土耳其语版的信度和效度》。

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C).

出版信息

Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Feb 11;49(1):162-169. doi: 10.3906/sag-1806-212.

DOI:10.3906/sag-1806-212
PMID:30764593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7371234/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) is one of the most frequently used questionnaires for evaluating moderate to vigorous levels of physical activity in children. However, a Turkish version of the questionnaire was not available. This study aimed to create a Turkish version of the PAQ-C and examine its psychometric characteristics and factor structure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted with 784 primary school students (ages 9–14 years). The PAQ-C was examined for content and construct validity and analyzed in terms of reliability. Content validity was evaluated with the content validity index (CVI), construct validity, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) (n = 388), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (n = 396). For reliability analysis, Cronbach’s alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. The factor construct was assessed with corrected item total correlations (CITCs).

RESULTS

The CVI for the PAQ-C was 0.95. EFA revealed a two-factor construct of ‘at school’ and ‘extracurricular’. CFA confirmed the two-factor construct. Factor loadings varied between 0.41 and 0.80. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.77 and ICC was 0.91 for the test-retest for the entire sample. All CITCs were >0.20

CONCLUSION

The PAQ-C is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used for Turkish children

摘要

背景/目的:《儿童体力活动问卷》(PAQ-C)是评估儿童中等到剧烈体力活动水平最常用的问卷之一。然而,该问卷没有土耳其语版本。本研究旨在创建 PAQ-C 的土耳其语版本,并检验其心理测量学特征和因子结构。

材料和方法

该研究共纳入 784 名小学生(年龄 9-14 岁)。对 PAQ-C 进行内容和结构效度检验,并从信度方面进行分析。内容效度采用内容效度指数(CVI)评估,结构效度采用探索性因子分析(EFA)(n=388)和验证性因子分析(CFA)(n=396)进行分析。为了进行可靠性分析,计算了克朗巴赫α系数和组内相关系数(ICC)。使用校正条目总分相关系数(CITCs)评估因子结构。

结果

PAQ-C 的 CVI 为 0.95。EFA 显示出“在学校”和“课外”两个因子结构。CFA 验证了两个因子结构。因子负荷在 0.41 到 0.80 之间变化。整个样本的克朗巴赫α系数为 0.77,ICC 为 0.91。所有 CITCs 均>0.20。

结论

PAQ-C 是一种有效且可靠的工具,可用于土耳其儿童。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62da/7371234/110d0edd678a/turkjmedsci-49-162-fig001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62da/7371234/110d0edd678a/turkjmedsci-49-162-fig001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62da/7371234/110d0edd678a/turkjmedsci-49-162-fig001.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C).《儿童体力活动问卷(PAQ-C)土耳其语版的信度和效度》。
Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Feb 11;49(1):162-169. doi: 10.3906/sag-1806-212.
2
Adaptation and validation of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) among Czech children.《大龄儿童体力活动问卷》(PAQ-C)在捷克儿童中的适应性调整与效度验证
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 12;16(1):e0245256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245256. eCollection 2021.
3
Psychometric evaluation of the child oral impacts on daily performances (C-OIDP) for use in Turkish primary school children: a cross sectional validation study.儿童口腔健康相关生活质量问卷中文版在土耳其小学生中的信度和效度评价:一项横断面验证研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01162-y.
4
Turkish adaptation of the pregnancy-related anxiety questionnaire-revised 2: Validity and reliability study in multiparous and primiparous pregnancy.《妊娠相关焦虑问卷修订版2》的土耳其语改编版:经产妇和初产妇妊娠中的效度和信度研究
Midwifery. 2018 Jul;62:61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
5
Adaptation of the Food Literacy Questionnaire for school children to Turkish: validity and reliability study.儿童食物素养问卷的土耳其语适应性改编:信度和效度研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Jul;182(7):3307-3316. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05010-3. Epub 2023 May 11.
6
Validation of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) among Chinese Children.《中国儿童中儿童体育活动问卷(PAQ-C)的效度验证》
Biomed Environ Sci. 2016 Mar;29(3):177-86. doi: 10.3967/bes2016.022.
7
Psychometric Properties of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children in Italy: Testing the Validity among a General and Clinical Pediatric Population.意大利大龄儿童体力活动问卷的心理测量学特性:在普通和临床儿科人群中检验效度
PLoS One. 2016 May 26;11(5):e0156354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156354. eCollection 2016.
8
Physical activity questionnaire for older children (PAQ-C): Arabic translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric validation in school-aged children in Saudi Arabia.《适用于大儿童的体力活动问卷(PAQ-C)》:阿拉伯语翻译、跨文化调适以及在沙特阿拉伯学龄儿童中的心理测量学验证。
PeerJ. 2022 Apr 12;10:e13237. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13237. eCollection 2022.
9
Reliability and Validity of the PAQ-C Questionnaire to Assess Physical Activity in Children.用于评估儿童身体活动的PAQ-C问卷的信度和效度
J Sch Health. 2016 Sep;86(9):677-85. doi: 10.1111/josh.12418.
10
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Salutogenic Health Indicator Scale.《健康本源指标量表土耳其语版本的有效性和信度研究》
Int J Nurs Pract. 2024 Apr;30(2):e13231. doi: 10.1111/ijn.13231. Epub 2023 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric Properties of Physical Activity Questionnaires for Children and Adolescents: An Updated Systematic Review.儿童和青少年身体活动问卷的心理测量特性:一项更新的系统评价。
Sports Med. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02270-x.
2
Time to Move: A 4-Week Gamified Mobile Application Intervention to Promote Physical Activity in Secondary School Students.行动时刻:一项为期四周的游戏化移动应用程序干预措施,以促进中学生的体育活动。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2025 Aug;25(8):e70027. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.70027.
3
Physical activity level and influencing factors in pediatric Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome patients: A case-control study.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability and Validity of the PAQ-C Questionnaire to Assess Physical Activity in Children.用于评估儿童身体活动的PAQ-C问卷的信度和效度
J Sch Health. 2016 Sep;86(9):677-85. doi: 10.1111/josh.12418.
2
Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance - United States, 2015.青少年风险行为监测 - 美国,2015 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2016 Jun 10;65(6):1-174. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6506a1.
3
Validation of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) among Chinese Children.《中国儿童中儿童体育活动问卷(PAQ-C)的效度验证》
小儿预激综合征患者的身体活动水平及影响因素:一项病例对照研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jul 9;184(8):475. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06290-7.
4
Assessment of Sport and Physical Recreation Participation for Children and Youth with Disabilities: A Systematic Review.残疾儿童和青少年参与体育和身体娱乐活动的评估:一项系统综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Apr 3;22(4):557. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040557.
5
Evaluation of Dynamic Respiratory Muscle Strength, Physical Fitness, and Physical Activity in Children with Asthma and Healthy Peers.哮喘儿童与健康同龄人的动态呼吸肌力量、身体素质和身体活动评估。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Dec 21;12(24):2579. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12242579.
6
The Chinese version of the physical activity questionnaire for adolescents: a psychometric validity, reliability, and invariance study.青少年体力活动问卷中文版:心理测量学效度、信度和不变性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 11;24(1):3117. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20563-0.
7
Comparative Impact of Core Stabilization vs Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Exercises on Muscle Activation, Endurance, and Balance in Obese Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.核心稳定性训练与本体感觉神经肌肉促进疗法对肥胖儿童肌肉激活、耐力和平衡的影响比较:一项随机对照试验。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Sep 30;30:e945669. doi: 10.12659/MSM.945669.
8
Peak expiratory flow, core performance and physical activity in normal-weight, overweight, and obese adolescents.正常体重、超重和肥胖青少年的呼气峰值流量、核心体能和身体活动
Clin Pediatr Endocrinol. 2024;33(3):124-130. doi: 10.1297/cpe.2024-0019. Epub 2024 Jun 1.
9
Development and psychometric testing of a questionnaire for the Korea Youth risk behavior survey to assess physical activity behaviors.开发并心理计量检验了一个用于韩国青少年风险行为调查的问卷,以评估身体活动行为。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 24;24(1):1686. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19216-z.
10
Effects of Aquatic Exercise and Floor Curling on Balance Ability and Lower Limb Muscle Strength in Children with Intellectual Disabilities: A Pilot Study in China.水上运动和地面卷曲运动对智力障碍儿童平衡能力和下肢肌肉力量的影响:一项中国的初步研究。
Children (Basel). 2024 Jan 11;11(1):85. doi: 10.3390/children11010085.
Biomed Environ Sci. 2016 Mar;29(3):177-86. doi: 10.3967/bes2016.022.
4
Reliability and Validity of the Dutch Physical Activity Questionnaires for Children (PAQ-C) and Adolescents (PAQ-A).荷兰儿童(PAQ-C)和青少年(PAQ-A)体力活动问卷的信度和效度。
Arch Public Health. 2014 Dec 24;72(1):47. doi: 10.1186/2049-3258-72-47. eCollection 2014.
5
Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline.用于跨文化医疗保健研究的工具或量表的翻译、改编和验证:清晰易用的指南。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Apr;17(2):268-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
6
Measuring activity in children and adolescents using self-report: PAQ-C and PAQ-A.使用自我报告法测量儿童和青少年的身体活动:儿童青少年身体活动问卷(PAQ-C)和青少年身体活动问卷(PAQ-A)。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Apr;40(4):767-72. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181620ed1.
7
Validation of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children in children of different races.不同种族儿童中《大龄儿童体力活动问卷》的效度验证。
Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2007 Feb;19(1):6-19. doi: 10.1123/pes.19.1.6.
8
Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年的体力活动评估
Sports Med. 2001;31(6):439-54. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200131060-00004.
9
Measuring general levels of physical activity: preliminary evidence for the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children.测量身体活动的总体水平:针对大龄儿童身体活动问卷的初步证据。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997 Oct;29(10):1344-9. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199710000-00011.
10
Determination and quantification of content validity.内容效度的确定与量化。
Nurs Res. 1986 Nov-Dec;35(6):382-5.