Suppr超能文献

关于项目反应理论中异常反应偏差的简短说明。

A Short Note on Aberrant Responses Bias in Item Response Theory.

作者信息

Jia Bing, Zhang Xue, Zhu Zhemin

机构信息

Teacher Training Center, Beihua University, Jilin City, China.

China Institute of Rural Education Development, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 31;10:43. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00043. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Item response models often cannot calculate true individual response probabilities because of the existence of response disturbances (such as guessing and cheating). Many studies on aberrant responses under item response theory (IRT) framework had been conducted. Some of them focused on how to reduce the effect of aberrant responses, and others focused on how to detect aberrant examinees, such as person fit analysis. The purpose of this research was to derive a generalized formula of bias with/without aberrant responses, that showed the effect of both non-aberrant and aberrant response data on the bias of capability estimation mathematically. A new evaluation criterion, named aberrant absolute bias (|ABIAS|), was proposed to detect aberrant examinees. Simulation studies and application to a real dataset were conducted to demonstrate the efficiency and the utility of |ABIAS|.

摘要

由于存在反应干扰(如猜测和作弊),项目反应模型往往无法计算真正的个体反应概率。在项目反应理论(IRT)框架下,已经开展了许多关于异常反应的研究。其中一些研究关注如何减少异常反应的影响,另一些则关注如何检测异常考生,如个体拟合分析。本研究的目的是推导一个有/无异常反应情况下偏差的广义公式,该公式从数学上显示了正常和异常反应数据对能力估计偏差的影响。提出了一种名为异常绝对偏差(|ABIAS|)的新评估标准来检测异常考生。进行了模拟研究并将其应用于一个真实数据集,以证明|ABIAS|的有效性和实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dace/6365413/abb5fefcdc10/fpsyg-10-00043-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
A Short Note on Aberrant Responses Bias in Item Response Theory.
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 31;10:43. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00043. eCollection 2019.
2
Robust maximum marginal likelihood (RMML) estimation for item response theory models.
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):573-588. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1150-4.
3
An Iterative Scale Purification Procedure on for the Detection of Aberrant Responses.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2024 Jan-Feb;59(1):62-77. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2023.2211564. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
5
A Mixture Response Time Process Model for Aberrant Behaviors and Item Nonresponses.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2023 Jan-Feb;58(1):71-89. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2021.1948815. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
6
An Item Response Model for True-False Exams Based on Signal Detection Theory.
Appl Psychol Meas. 2020 May;44(3):234-248. doi: 10.1177/0146621619843823. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
7
Using Deterministic, Gated Item Response Theory Model to detect test cheating due to item compromise.
Psychometrika. 2013 Jul;78(3):481-97. doi: 10.1007/s11336-012-9311-3. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
8
A Comparison of Robust Likelihood Estimators to Mitigate Bias From Rapid Guessing.
Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 May;46(3):236-249. doi: 10.1177/01466216221084371. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
9
Item Response Theory Modeling for Examinee-selected Items with Rater Effect.
Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 Sep;43(6):435-448. doi: 10.1177/0146621618798667. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
10
Diagnosing item score patterns on a test using item response theory-based person-fit statistics.
Psychol Methods. 2003 Mar;8(1):72-87. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.8.1.72.

引用本文的文献

2
Aberrant Responding in Hypothesis Testing: A Threat to Validity or Source of Insight?
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 6;15(3):319. doi: 10.3390/bs15030319.

本文引用的文献

1
Asymptotic Corrections of Standardized Extended Caution Indices.
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 Sep;40(6):418-433. doi: 10.1177/0146621616649963. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
2
On Latent Trait Estimation in Multidimensional Compensatory Item Response Models.
Psychometrika. 2015 Jun;80(2):428-49. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9399-0. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
3
On the asymptotic standard error of a class of robust estimators of ability in dichotomous item response models.
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2014 Nov;67(3):430-50. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12027. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
4
Diagnosing item score patterns on a test using item response theory-based person-fit statistics.
Psychol Methods. 2003 Mar;8(1):72-87. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.8.1.72.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验