Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, PO Box 40, 00032, Työterveyslaitos, Helsinki, Finland.
Center for Life Course Health Research, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019 Apr;92(3):371-381. doi: 10.1007/s00420-019-01412-9. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
To investigate the association between personal meaning of work and perceived work ability among middle-aged workers with physically strenuous or light work. We evaluated the course of perceived work ability from 31 to 46 years and examined the possible differences in the association between personal meaning of work and perceived work ability at the age of 46 depending on physical workload.
The study population consisted of participants of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 (n = 4420). Data were collected through questionnaires at 31 and 46 years. The main outcome was perceived work ability (0-7 = poor, 8-10 = good) and the main explanatory measures were physically strenuous work and personal meaning of work. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were adjusted for unhealthy habits, number of diseases, job strain, social support at work, employment history and gender. They were also stratified for the strenuousness of work.
Perceived work ability decreased during the 15-year follow-up in both the strenuous and light work groups, and was lowest among workers with strenuous work. Perceived work ability remained poor or decreased in 22% of men and 21% of women in the strenuous work group vs. 14% and 13% in the light work group, respectively. After adjusting for confounders, the participants in both groups who reported low personal meaning of work were at approximately a twofold risk of having poor perceived work ability at 46 years compared to the participants who reported high personal meaning of work.
Perceived work ability was significantly lower and deteriorated more during the follow-up among participants with strenuous work. High personal meaning of work was important for good work ability, irrespective of the strenuousness of work.
探讨体力工作和轻体力工作的中年劳动者工作意义与工作能力知觉之间的关系。我们评估了从 31 岁到 46 岁之间工作能力知觉的变化过程,并根据体力负荷探讨了 46 岁时工作意义与工作能力知觉之间关联的可能差异。
本研究的研究对象为 1966 年芬兰北部出生队列研究的参与者(n=4420)。数据通过问卷于 31 岁和 46 岁时收集。主要结局是工作能力知觉(0-7=差,8-10=好),主要解释性措施是体力工作和工作意义。多变量逻辑回归分析调整了不健康习惯、疾病数量、工作压力、工作中的社会支持、就业历史和性别。还按工作强度进行了分层。
在 15 年的随访中,无论是在体力工作者还是在轻体力工作者中,工作能力知觉都有所下降,且在体力工作者中最低。在体力工作者中,22%的男性和 21%的女性工作能力知觉仍然较差或下降,而在轻体力工作者中,分别为 14%和 13%。在调整混杂因素后,与报告工作意义高的参与者相比,报告工作意义低的两组参与者在 46 岁时出现较差工作能力知觉的风险约为两倍。
在随访期间,体力工作者的工作能力知觉明显更低,且下降更明显。高工作意义对于良好的工作能力很重要,而与工作强度无关。