• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[The enhanced medication: The use of medicine in transhumanistic discourses and its social meanings].

作者信息

Le Dévédec Nicolas, Collin Johanne

出版信息

J Int Bioethique Ethique Sci. 2018 September-December;29(3):93-108. doi: 10.3917/jibes.293.0093.

DOI:10.3917/jibes.293.0093
PMID:30767463
Abstract

Though NBICs and their overlap are at the heart of transhumanist claims in favour of human enhancement, medication also occupies a central place. In many of the movement's writings and lectures, it is one of the primary means systematically considered to extend human biological boundaries and improve physical, intellectual and emotional performance. Taking a sociological perspective, this article aims to explore the role and meaning medication holds in transhumanist discourse. Declared the tool for true human emancipation, the non-therapeutic use of medication for which transhumanists advocate is actually carried out against a heightened biomedicalization of many contemporary social issues. After having explored this ambivalence, our article demonstrates that, hardly specific to this fringe movement, transhumanists' aspirations of pharmacologically reaching ?better than well? fits more broadly into contemporary biomedical pretentions, of which transhumanism is just one extreme example.

摘要

相似文献

1
[The enhanced medication: The use of medicine in transhumanistic discourses and its social meanings].
J Int Bioethique Ethique Sci. 2018 September-December;29(3):93-108. doi: 10.3917/jibes.293.0093.
2
Antiquity's Missive to Transhumanism1.古代致超人类主义的书信1。
J Med Philos. 2017 Jun 1;42(3):278-303. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhx008.
3
Bioethics and Transhumanism.生物伦理学与超人类主义。
J Med Philos. 2017 Jun 1;42(3):237-260. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhx001.
4
Transhumanism: A New Kind of Promethean Hubris.超人类主义:一种新型的普罗米修斯式傲慢。
New Bioeth. 2015;21(2):117-27. doi: 10.1179/2050287715z.00000000060.
5
Transhumanism, Moral Perfection, and Those 76 Trombones.人 工 智 能、道 德 完 美 主 义 与 那 76 支 长 号
J Med Philos. 2020 Mar 19;45(2):179-192. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhz040.
6
Does post-humanism still need ethics? The normativity of an open nature.后人类主义是否仍需要伦理学?开放自然的规范性。
Cuad Bioet. 2014 Sep-Dec;25(85):469-79.
7
The question of disability in the post-human debate. Critical remarks.后人类辩论中的残疾问题。批判性评论。
Cuad Bioet. 2014 Sep-Dec;25(85):445-56.
8
Why Should We Become Posthuman? The Beneficence Argument Questioned.我们为何要成为后人类?对慈善论证的质疑。
J Med Philos. 2019 Mar 16;44(2):192-219. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhy041.
9
The Posthuman as Hollow Idol: A Nietzschean Critique of Human Enhancement.作为空洞偶像的后人类:对人类增强的尼采式批判
J Med Philos. 2017 Jun 1;42(3):304-327. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhx002.
10
Transhumanism, metaphysics, and the posthuman god.超人类主义、形而上学与后人类之神。
J Med Philos. 2010 Dec;35(6):700-20. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq047. Epub 2010 Nov 18.