Neuroscience Department,Oberlin College,OH
Department of Psychology & Research Center for Translational Medicine,Koç University,34450 Sarıyer/Istanbul,
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Jan;41:e243. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18001401.
Rahnev & Denison (R&D) argue against normative theories and in favor of a more descriptive "standard observer model" of perceptual decision making. We agree with the authors in many respects, but we argue that optimality (specifically, reward-rate maximization) has proved demonstrably useful as a hypothesis, contrary to the authors' claims.
拉赫内和丹尼森(R&D)反对规范理论,支持更具描述性的感知决策“标准观察者模型”。在许多方面我们都同意作者的观点,但我们认为,最优性(具体来说,最大化奖励率)已被证明是一个有用的假设,这与作者的观点相反。