Neuroscience Department,Oberlin College,OH
Department of Psychology & Research Center for Translational Medicine,Koç University,34450 Sarıyer/Istanbul,
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Jan;41:e243. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18001401.
Rahnev & Denison (R&D) argue against normative theories and in favor of a more descriptive "standard observer model" of perceptual decision making. We agree with the authors in many respects, but we argue that optimality (specifically, reward-rate maximization) has proved demonstrably useful as a hypothesis, contrary to the authors' claims.
拉赫内和丹尼森（R&D）反对规范理论，支持更具描述性的感知决策“标准观察者模型”。在许多方面我们都同意作者的观点，但我们认为，最优性（具体来说，最大化奖励率）已被证明是一个有用的假设，这与作者的观点相反。
