• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Healthcare provider diagnostic testing practices for identification of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in children: an Emerging Infections Network survey.医疗机构对儿童艰难梭菌(梭状芽孢杆菌)检测的诊断实践:一项新兴传染病网络调查。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;40(3):276-280. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.347. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
2
A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) and Algorithms Including NAATs for the Diagnosis of () in Adults.一项关于核酸扩增检测(NAATs)和包括 NAATs 在内的算法在诊断成人()中的实验室医学最佳实践系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019 May 29;32(3). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00032-18. Print 2019 Jun 19.
3
Diagnostic testing methods for Clostridium difficile infection: A statewide survey of Ohio acute care hospitals.艰难梭菌感染的诊断检测方法:俄亥俄州急性护理医院的全州范围调查。
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Mar 1;45(3):306-307. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
4
Variability in testing policies and impact on reported Clostridium difficile infection rates: results from the pilot Longitudinal European Clostridium difficile Infection Diagnosis surveillance study (LuCID).检测政策的变异性及其对艰难梭菌感染报告率的影响:欧洲艰难梭菌感染纵向诊断监测试点研究(LuCID)的结果
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Dec;35(12):1949-1956. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2746-1. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
5
Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays Detect Clostridioides difficile Infection With Greater Severity and Higher Recurrence Rates.毒素酶免疫测定法检测艰难梭菌感染的严重程度更高,复发率更高。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 30;69(10):1667-1674. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz009.
6
The Clinical and Laboratory Impact of Upgrading Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile Infection Testing from Routine to Molecular Based-Algorithm: an Observational Case-Study from the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.将艰难梭菌感染检测从常规方法升级为基于分子的算法的临床和实验室影响:来自沙特阿拉伯东部省的一项观察性病例研究。 (注:Clostridioides difficile是艰难梭菌的新属名,原文中括号内的formerly Clostridium表示以前的梭菌属)
Clin Lab. 2019 Aug 1;65(8). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2019.181252.
7
Asymptomatic and yet C. difficile-toxin positive? Prevalence and risk factors of carriers of toxigenic Clostridium difficile among geriatric in-patients.无症状但艰难梭菌毒素呈阳性?老年住院患者中产毒艰难梭菌携带者的患病率及危险因素
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Nov 15;16(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0358-3.
8
Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Quantitation as Predictor of Toxin Presence in Clostridium difficile Infection.核酸扩增试验定量检测对艰难梭菌感染中毒素存在的预测价值。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Feb 22;56(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01316-17. Print 2018 Mar.
9
Diagnostic stewardship of C. difficile testing: a quasi-experimental antimicrobial stewardship study.艰难梭菌检测的诊断管理:一项准实验性抗菌药物管理研究。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;40(3):269-275. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.336. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
10
Two-step Testing for Clostridioides Difficile is Inadequate in Differentiating Infection From Colonization in Children.两步法检测艰难梭菌在区分儿童感染与定植方面并不充分。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2021 Mar 1;72(3):378-383. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002944.

引用本文的文献

1
Infections in Children: What Is the Optimal Laboratory Diagnostic Method?儿童感染:最佳实验室诊断方法是什么?
Microorganisms. 2024 Aug 28;12(9):1785. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12091785.
2
Assessment of Knowledge and Practice of Healthcare Providers in Saudi Arabia Regarding Infection Diagnosis and Management: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire-Based Study.沙特阿拉伯医疗服务提供者关于感染诊断与管理的知识和实践评估:一项基于问卷调查的横断面研究。
Infect Drug Resist. 2024 Feb 14;17:583-594. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S450281. eCollection 2024.
3
Clostridioides difficile Infection in Children: Recent Updates on Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Therapy.儿童艰难梭菌感染:流行病学、诊断、治疗的最新进展。
Pediatrics. 2023 Sep 1;152(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-062307.
4
Two-step Testing for Clostridioides Difficile is Inadequate in Differentiating Infection From Colonization in Children.两步法检测艰难梭菌在区分儿童感染与定植方面并不充分。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2021 Mar 1;72(3):378-383. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002944.
5
An Infectious Diseases Perspective on Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Clostridioides difficile Infection in Children.儿童艰难梭菌感染的粪便微生物群移植的传染病学观点。
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2019 Dec 27;8(6):580-584. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piz062.
6
Lack of false-positive results for Clostridioides difficile toxins A and B using two commercial enzyme immunoassays in pediatric patients.在儿科患者中使用两种商业酶免疫测定法检测艰难梭菌毒素A和B时未出现假阳性结果。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;40(7):825-826. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.104. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).临床实践指南:成人和儿童艰难梭菌感染:美国传染病学会(IDSA)和美国医疗保健流行病学学会(SHEA) 2017 年更新。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):e1-e48. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1085.
2
Strategies for Optimizing the Diagnostic Predictive Value of Clostridium difficile Molecular Diagnostics.优化艰难梭菌分子诊断的诊断预测价值的策略
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 May;55(5):1244-1248. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00147-17. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
3
Real-Time Electronic Tracking of Diarrheal Episodes and Laxative Therapy Enables Verification of Clostridium difficile Clinical Testing Criteria and Reduction of Clostridium difficile Infection Rates.腹泻发作和泻药治疗的实时电子追踪可验证艰难梭菌临床检测标准并降低艰难梭菌感染率。
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 May;55(5):1276-1284. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02319-16. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
4
The Use of a Computerized Provider Order Entry Alert to Decrease Rates of Clostridium difficile Testing in Young Pediatric Patients.使用计算机化医嘱录入警报降低年幼儿童艰难梭菌检测率
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 May;38(5):542-546. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.16. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
5
Impact of a Healthcare Provider Educational Intervention on Frequency of Clostridium difficile Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing in Children: A Segmented Regression Analysis.医疗机构教育干预对儿童艰难梭菌聚合酶链反应检测频率的影响:分段回归分析。
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2017 Jun 1;6(2):142-148. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piw027.
6
Similar proportions of stool specimens from hospitalized children with and without diarrhea test positive for Clostridium difficile.患有腹泻和未患腹泻的住院儿童的粪便样本中,艰难梭菌检测呈阳性的比例相似。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015 Mar;34(3):261-6. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000556.
7
High colonization rate and prolonged shedding of Clostridium difficile in pediatric oncology patients.儿科肿瘤患者艰难梭菌的高定植率和长期排菌
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Aug 1;59(3):401-3. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu302. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
8
The Infectious Diseases Society of America emerging infections network: bridging the gap between clinical infectious diseases and public health.美国传染病学会新发感染网络:弥合临床传染病与公共卫生之间的差距。
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;58(7):991-6. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit932. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
9
Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.艰难梭菌感染的诊断:临床医生和临床实验室面临的持续难题。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013 Jul;26(3):604-30. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00016-13.
10
Clostridium difficile Infection in Children: Current State and Unanswered Questions.儿童艰难梭菌感染:现状与未解决的问题
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2012 Sep;1(3):230-43. doi: 10.1093/jpids/pis071. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

医疗机构对儿童艰难梭菌(梭状芽孢杆菌)检测的诊断实践:一项新兴传染病网络调查。

Healthcare provider diagnostic testing practices for identification of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in children: an Emerging Infections Network survey.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics,Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine,Chicago, Illinois.

Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion,National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;40(3):276-280. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.347. Epub 2019 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1017/ice.2018.347
PMID:30767829
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6934170/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterize healthcare provider diagnostic testing practices for identifying Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI) and asymptomatic carriage in children.

DESIGN

Electronic survey.

METHODS

An 11-question survey was sent by e-mail or facsimile to all pediatric infectious diseases (PID) members of the Infectious Diseases Society of America's Emerging Infections Network (EIN).

RESULTS

Among 345 eligible respondents who had ever responded to an EIN survey, 196 (57%) responded; 162 of these (83%) were aware of their institutional policies for CDI testing and management. Also, 159 (98%) respondents knew their institution's C. difficile testing method: 99 (62%) utilize NAAT without toxin testing and 60 (38%) utilize toxin testing, either as a single test or a multistep algorithm. Of 153 respondents, 10 (7%) reported that formed stools were tested for C. difficile at their institution, and 76 of 151 (50%) reported that their institution does not restrict C. difficile testing in infants and young children. The frequency of symptom- and age-based testing restrictions did not vary between institutions utilizing NAAT alone compared to those utilizing toxin testing for C. difficile diagnosis. Of 143 respondents, 26 (16%) permit testing of neonatal intensive care unit patients and 12 of 26 (46%) treat CDI with antibiotics in this patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that there are opportunities to improve CDI diagnostic stewardship practices in children, including among hospitals using NAATs alone for CDI diagnosis in children.

摘要

目的

描述医疗保健提供者识别艰难梭菌(梭状芽孢杆菌)感染(CDI)和无症状携带的诊断检测实践,以适用于儿童。

设计

电子调查。

方法

通过电子邮件或传真向美国传染病学会新兴感染网络(EIN)的所有儿科传染病(PID)成员发送了一份 11 个问题的调查。

结果

在 345 名符合条件的 EIN 调查应答者中,有 196 名(57%)应答者;其中 162 名(83%)知晓其机构针对 CDI 检测和管理的政策。此外,159 名(98%)应答者知晓其机构的艰难梭菌检测方法:99 名(62%)采用核酸扩增技术(NAAT)而不进行毒素检测,60 名(38%)采用毒素检测,或作为单步检测或多步算法。在 153 名应答者中,有 10 名(7%)报告其机构对成形粪便进行艰难梭菌检测,在 151 名应答者中,有 76 名(50%)报告其机构不对婴儿和幼儿进行艰难梭菌检测。仅采用 NAAT 与同时采用毒素检测用于 CDI 诊断的机构之间,基于症状和年龄的检测限制的频率并无差异。在 143 名应答者中,有 26 名(16%)允许对新生儿重症监护病房患者进行检测,在这一患者群体中,有 12 名(46%)用抗生素治疗 CDI。

结论

这些数据表明,有机会改善儿童 CDI 诊断管理实践,包括在仅采用 NAAT 用于儿童 CDI 诊断的医院中。