School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 15;14(2):e0212293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212293. eCollection 2019.
To determine whether classes of diabetes medications are associated with cognitive health and dementia risk, above and beyond their glycemic control properties.
Findings were pooled from 5 population-based cohorts: the Framingham Heart Study, the Rotterdam Study, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, the Aging Gene-Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study (AGES) and the Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA). Differences between users and non-users of insulin, metformin and sulfonylurea were assessed in each cohort for cognitive and brain MRI measures using linear regression models, and cognitive decline and dementia/AD risk using mixed effect models and Cox regression analyses, respectively. Findings were then pooled using meta-analytic techniques, including 3,590 individuals with diabetes for the prospective analysis.
After adjusting for potential confounders including indices of glycemic control, insulin use was associated with increased risk of new-onset dementia (pooled HR (95% CI) = 1.58 (1.18, 2.12);p = 0.002) and with a greater decline in global cognitive function (β = -0.014±0.007;p = 0.045). The associations with incident dementia remained similar after further adjustment for renal function and excluding persons with diabetes whose treatment was life-style change only. Insulin use was not related to cognitive function nor to brain MRI measures. No significant associations were found between metformin or sulfonylurea use and outcomes of brain function and structure. There was no evidence of significant between-study heterogeneity.
Despite its advantages in controlling glycemic dysregulation and preventing complications, insulin treatment may be associated with increased adverse cognitive outcomes possibly due to a greater risk of hypoglycemia.
确定糖尿病药物类别是否与认知健康和痴呆风险相关,而不仅仅是因为它们控制血糖的特性。
研究结果来自 5 个人群队列:弗雷明汉心脏研究、鹿特丹研究、社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究(ARIC)、雷克雅未克老龄化基因-环境易感性研究(AGES)和萨克拉门托老龄化拉丁裔研究(SALSA)。在每个队列中,使用线性回归模型评估胰岛素、二甲双胍和磺酰脲类药物使用者与非使用者之间的认知和脑 MRI 测量差异,使用混合效应模型和 Cox 回归分析分别评估认知能力下降和痴呆/AD 风险。然后使用荟萃分析技术对研究结果进行汇总,包括前瞻性分析中的 3590 名糖尿病患者。
在调整了包括血糖控制指数在内的潜在混杂因素后,胰岛素的使用与新发痴呆的风险增加相关(汇总 HR(95%CI)=1.58(1.18,2.12);p=0.002),并与全球认知功能下降相关(β=-0.014±0.007;p=0.045)。在进一步调整肾功能并排除仅接受生活方式改变治疗的糖尿病患者后,与新发痴呆的关联仍然相似。胰岛素的使用与认知功能或脑 MRI 测量无关。二甲双胍或磺酰脲类药物的使用与脑功能和结构的结果之间没有显著关联。没有证据表明存在研究间的显著异质性。
尽管胰岛素在控制血糖失调和预防并发症方面具有优势,但胰岛素治疗可能与不良认知结果相关,这可能是由于低血糖的风险增加所致。