Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
J Rehabil Med. 2019 Mar 13;51(3):175-182. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2520.
To assess: (i) whether changes in the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) were greater for multicomponent inpatient rehabilitation vs outpatient cognitive behavioural therapy, and (ii) whether baseline scores and changes (pre- to post-intervention) in FABQ were associated with future work-participation.
Individuals sick-listed for 2-12 months were randomized to inpatient multicomponent rehabilitation (3.5 weeks or 4+4 days) or outpatient cognitive behavioural therapy (6 sessions/6 weeks).
A total of 334 subjects were included. There were no significant differences on FABQ between the in- and out-patient programmes during follow-up. Participants with consistently low scores on the work subscale had more work-participation days, followed by those who reduced their scores. Participants who increased, or had consistently high scores had the least workdays. For the physical activity subscale, the associations were weaker. FABQ-work scores at baseline were associated with number of work-participation days for both musculoskeletal and psychological diagnoses, and more strongly for the latter group.
This study suggests that FABQ could be a useful prognostic tool for individuals on sick leave due to musculoskeletal or psychological disorders. There was no evidence that inpatient occupational rehabilitation reduces FABQ scores more than outpatient cognitive behavioural therapy.
评估:(i)多模式住院康复与门诊认知行为疗法相比, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire(FABQ)的变化是否更大,(ii) FABQ 的基线评分和变化(干预前至干预后)是否与未来的工作参与有关。
因 2-12 个月而请病假的个体被随机分配到住院多模式康复(3.5 周或 4+4 天)或门诊认知行为疗法(6 次/6 周)。
共纳入 334 名受试者。在随访期间,门诊和住院方案之间的 FABQ 没有显著差异。在工作子量表上始终得分较低的参与者有更多的工作参与天数,其次是那些分数降低的参与者。分数增加或始终较高的参与者工作天数最少。对于身体活动子量表,相关性较弱。FABQ-工作评分与肌肉骨骼和心理诊断的工作参与天数相关,与后者的相关性更强。
本研究表明,FABQ 可能是肌肉骨骼或心理障碍导致请病假的个体的有用预后工具。没有证据表明住院职业康复比门诊认知行为疗法更能降低 FABQ 评分。