Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 5;18(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5130-5.
Recent research has suggested that interventions at the workplace might be the most potent ingredient in return to work interventions, but few studies have investigated the different effects of workplace interventions as part of occupational rehabilitation programs. The comprehensive design described in this article includes effect (on return to work and health outcomes), and health economic evaluations of a workplace intervention added to a multicomponent rehabilitation program. Qualitative and mixed method studies will investigate sick-listed persons', rehabilitation therapists' and employers' perspectives on the usability and outcomes of the rehabilitation program and the workplace intervention. The program and intervention are provided to patients with musculoskeletal, psychological or general and unspecified diagnoses. The program is multi-component and includes Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, physical exercise, patient education and creating a plan for increased work participation.
Persons who are employed, aged from 18 to 60 years, with a current sick leave status of 50% or more and a diagnosis within the musculoskeletal, psychological or general and unspecified chapters of International Classification of Primary Care-2 (ICPC-2) will be recruited to a researcher-blinded parallel-group randomized controlled trial. All participants take part in an in-patient occupational rehabilitation program, while the intervention group also takes part in an intervention at the workplace. The effect and economic evaluation will investigate the effect of the added workplace intervention. The primary outcome measures will be time until full sustainable return to work and total number of sickness absence days in the 12 months after inclusion. Health economic evaluations will investigate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility. Qualitative studies will investigate rehabilitation therapists' experiences with working towards return to work within an ACT-approach and stakeholders' experiences with the workplace intervention. A mixed methods study will combine quantitative and qualitative findings on the participants' expectations and motivation for return to work.
The outline of this comprehensive study could represent an important addition to the standard designs of return to work evaluation. The mixed methods design, with qualitative approaches as well as a rigorous randomized controlled trial, might prove useful to shed light on contextual factors.
ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT02541890 . September 4, 2015.
最近的研究表明,工作场所的干预措施可能是重返工作干预措施中最有效的组成部分,但很少有研究调查工作场所干预措施作为职业康复计划的一部分的不同效果。本文描述的综合设计包括对附加于多组分康复计划的工作场所干预措施的效果(对重返工作和健康结果的影响)和健康经济评估。定性和混合方法研究将调查患者、康复治疗师和雇主对康复计划和工作场所干预措施的可用性和结果的看法。该计划和干预措施提供给患有肌肉骨骼、心理或一般和未特指诊断的患者。该计划是多组分的,包括接受和承诺疗法、体育锻炼、患者教育和制定增加工作参与度的计划。
受雇的 18 至 60 岁人群,当前的病假状态为 50%或更高,并且具有国际初级保健分类-2(ICPC-2)的肌肉骨骼、心理或一般和未特指章节的诊断,将被招募到一项研究人员盲法平行组随机对照试验中。所有参与者都参加住院职业康复计划,而干预组还参加工作场所的干预措施。效果和经济评估将调查附加工作场所干预措施的效果。主要的结果测量将是完全可持续重返工作的时间和纳入后 12 个月内的总病假天数。健康经济评估将调查成本效益和成本效用。定性研究将调查康复治疗师在 ACT 方法下努力重返工作的经验以及利益相关者对工作场所干预措施的经验。混合方法研究将结合参与者对重返工作的期望和动机的定量和定性发现。
该综合研究的大纲可能是重返工作评估标准设计的重要补充。混合方法设计,包括定性方法和严格的随机对照试验,可能有助于阐明背景因素。
ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02541890。2015 年 9 月 4 日。