Center for Behavioral Epidemiology and Community Health, Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.
Psychology, Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA.
Tob Control. 2020 Mar;29(2):183-190. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054717. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
Previous secondhand smoke (SHS) reduction interventions have provided only feedback on reported smoking behaviour, such as coaching, or presenting results from child cotinine assays or air particle counters.
This SHS reduction trial assigned families at random to brief coaching and continuous real-time feedback (intervention) or measurement-only (control) groups.
We enrolled 298 families with a resident tobacco smoker and a child under age 14.
We installed air particle monitors in all homes. For the intervention homes, light and sound feedback was contingent on elevated indoor particle levels, and up to four coaching sessions used prompts and praise contingent on smoking outdoors. Mean intervention duration was 64 days.
The primary outcome was 'particle events' (PEs) which were patterns of air particle concentrations indicative of the occurrence of particle-generating behaviours such as smoking cigarettes or burning candles. Other measures included indoor air nicotine concentrations and participant reports of particle-generating behaviour.
PEs were significantly correlated with air nicotine levels (r=0.60) and reported indoor cigarette smoking (r=0.51). Interrupted time-series analyses showed an immediate intervention effect, with reduced PEs the day following intervention initiation. The trajectory of daily PEs over the intervention period declined significantly faster in intervention homes than in control homes. Pretest to post-test, air nicotine levels, cigarette smoking and e-cigarette use decreased more in intervention homes than in control homes.
Results suggest that real-time particle feedback and coaching contingencies reduced PEs generated by cigarette smoking and other sources.
NCT01634334; Post-results.
以往的二手烟(SHS)减少干预措施仅提供有关报告吸烟行为的反馈,例如辅导,或提供儿童可替宁检测或空气粒子计数器的结果。
这项 SHS 减少试验将家庭随机分配到简短辅导和连续实时反馈(干预)或仅测量(对照)组。
我们招募了 298 个有居住在家庭中的吸烟者和 14 岁以下儿童的家庭。
我们在所有家庭中安装了空气粒子监测器。对于干预家庭,光和声反馈取决于室内粒子水平升高,最多进行四次辅导,根据在户外吸烟的情况进行提示和表扬。干预的平均持续时间为 64 天。
主要结果是“粒子事件”(PEs),这是指示发生产生粒子行为(如吸烟或燃烧蜡烛)的空气粒子浓度模式。其他措施包括室内空气尼古丁浓度和参与者报告的产生粒子行为。
PEs 与空气尼古丁水平(r=0.60)和报告的室内吸烟(r=0.51)显著相关。中断时间序列分析显示出即时干预效果,干预开始后的第二天 PEs 减少。干预期间每日 PEs 的轨迹在干预家庭中比在对照家庭中下降得更快。在干预家庭中,从测试前到测试后,空气尼古丁水平、吸烟和电子烟使用量下降幅度大于对照家庭。
结果表明,实时粒子反馈和辅导条件减少了香烟和其他来源产生的 PEs。
NCT01634334;结果后。