• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于奖励条件刺激的预测价值的知识会调节它们对认知过程的干扰。

Knowledge about the predictive value of reward conditioned stimuli modulates their interference with cognitive processes.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QH, United Kingdom.

Sussex Addiction Research and Intervention Centre (SARIC), University of Sussex BN1 9QH, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Learn Mem. 2019 Feb 15;26(3):66-76. doi: 10.1101/lm.048272.118. Print 2019 Mar.

DOI:10.1101/lm.048272.118
PMID:30770463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6380200/
Abstract

Stimuli conditioned with a substance can generate drug-approach behaviors due to their acquired motivational properties. According to implicit theories of addiction, these stimuli can decrease cognitive control automatically. The present study ( = 49) examined whether reward-associated stimuli can interfere with cognitive processes in the absence of knowledge about stimulus-outcome contingencies. Conditioned stimuli (CS) were paired with high-reward (HR) or low-reward (LR) probabilities of monetary reward using a Pavlovian learning task. Participants were categorized as Aware or Unaware of contingencies using a Bayesian analysis. CS were then used as task-irrelevant distractors in modified flanker and -back tasks. Results show HR CS can generate increased interference in the flanker task for participants Unaware of contingencies, contributing further evidence for the existence of implicit Pavlovian conditioning. For the -back task, working memory performance was affected by HR CS, albeit only for Aware participants. These results suggest that CS can interfere implicitly with cognitive processes in a similar way to drug-related stimuli. Such an effect could occur in a stimulus-driven fashion, devoid of top-down goal-directedness. These findings have implications for the conceptualization and study of implicit processes in addiction and highlights the necessity to reconsider the measurement of such phenomena.

摘要

由于获得了动机属性,与物质相关联的刺激可以产生药物趋近行为。根据成瘾的内隐理论,这些刺激可以自动降低认知控制。本研究(n=49)检验了在不知道刺激-结果关联的情况下,奖励相关刺激是否可以在没有认知过程的情况下进行干扰。使用巴甫洛夫学习任务将条件刺激(CS)与高奖励(HR)或低奖励(LR)的货币奖励概率配对。使用贝叶斯分析将参与者分为有条件或无条件意识。然后,将 CS 用作修改后的侧抑制和返回任务中的无关分心物。结果表明,对于无条件意识的参与者,HR CS 可以在侧抑制任务中产生更大的干扰,这进一步证明了内隐巴甫洛夫条件作用的存在。对于返回任务,尽管只有有意识的参与者,但是 HR CS 会影响工作记忆性能。这些结果表明,CS 可以以类似与药物相关的刺激的方式隐式干扰认知过程。这种影响可能以刺激驱动的方式发生,而无需自上而下的目标导向。这些发现对成瘾中内隐过程的概念化和研究具有启示意义,并强调有必要重新考虑此类现象的测量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55af/6380200/de2943dedd94/LM048272Leg_F5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55af/6380200/29a8d30b4412/LM048272Leg_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55af/6380200/353388ba1136/LM048272Leg_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55af/6380200/e2c236b9efb5/LM048272Leg_F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55af/6380200/a2fde5d8dc1a/LM048272Leg_F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55af/6380200/de2943dedd94/LM048272Leg_F5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55af/6380200/29a8d30b4412/LM048272Leg_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55af/6380200/353388ba1136/LM048272Leg_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55af/6380200/e2c236b9efb5/LM048272Leg_F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55af/6380200/a2fde5d8dc1a/LM048272Leg_F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55af/6380200/de2943dedd94/LM048272Leg_F5.jpg

相似文献

1
Knowledge about the predictive value of reward conditioned stimuli modulates their interference with cognitive processes.关于奖励条件刺激的预测价值的知识会调节它们对认知过程的干扰。
Learn Mem. 2019 Feb 15;26(3):66-76. doi: 10.1101/lm.048272.118. Print 2019 Mar.
2
Attentional responses to stimuli associated with a reward can occur in the absence of knowledge of their predictive values.对与奖励相关的刺激的注意力反应可能在不知道其预测价值的情况下发生。
Behav Brain Res. 2018 Apr 2;341:26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.12.015. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
3
Pavlovian reward learning underlies value driven attentional capture.巴甫洛夫式奖赏学习是价值驱动注意力捕获的基础。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Feb;79(2):415-428. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1241-1.
4
Predictive but not emotional value of Pavlovian stimuli leads to pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer.巴甫洛夫式刺激的预测价值而非情感价值会导致巴甫洛夫式到工具性的转换。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Mar 15;321:214-222. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.12.022. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
5
Dissociation of neural responses and skin conductance reactions during fear conditioning with and without awareness of stimulus contingencies.在有和没有意识到刺激关联性的恐惧条件反射过程中神经反应与皮肤电传导反应的分离。
Neuroimage. 2006 Aug 15;32(2):761-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.038. Epub 2006 May 2.
6
Single-response appetitive Pavlovian to instrumental transfer is suppressed by aversive counter-conditioning.单反应性食欲型巴甫洛夫式到工具性转换受到厌恶反条件作用的抑制。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Dec;72(12):2820-2832. doi: 10.1177/1747021819862996. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
7
Avoiding pitfalls: Bayes factors can be a reliable tool for post hoc data selection in implicit learning.避免陷阱:贝叶斯因子可以成为内隐学习中事后数据选择的可靠工具。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Dec;28(6):1848-1859. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01901-4. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
8
The development of an attentional bias for angry faces following Pavlovian fear conditioning.在条件性恐惧反应之后,出现了对愤怒面孔的注意力偏向。
Behav Res Ther. 2009 Apr;47(4):322-30. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.01.007. Epub 2009 Jan 24.
9
Ablation of NMDA receptors in dopamine neurons disrupts attribution of incentive salience to reward-paired stimuli.多巴胺能神经元中NMDA受体的消融破坏了对奖励配对刺激的动机显著性归因。
Behav Brain Res. 2019 May 2;363:77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.01.037. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
10
Capture and Control: Working Memory Modulates Attentional Capture by Reward-Related Stimuli.捕获与控制:工作记忆调节与奖励相关刺激的注意捕获。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Aug;30(8):1174-1185. doi: 10.1177/0956797619855964. Epub 2019 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Getting a grip on visual search: Relating effort exertion to the control of attention.掌控视觉搜索:将努力程度与注意力控制联系起来。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Feb;87(2):670-684. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03024-7. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
2
Task-switching mechanisms under methamphetamine cravings: sex differences in cued and voluntary task-switching.甲基苯丙胺成瘾时的任务切换机制:线索诱发和自主任务切换中的性别差异
Front Neurosci. 2024 Oct 30;18:1462157. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1462157. eCollection 2024.
3
Generalisation of value-based attentional priority is category-specific.

本文引用的文献

1
Attentional capture by alcohol-related stimuli may be activated involuntarily by top-down search goals.酒精相关刺激引起的注意捕获可能是由自上而下的搜索目标无意识激活的。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Jul;235(7):2087-2099. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4906-8. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
2
Attentional responses to stimuli associated with a reward can occur in the absence of knowledge of their predictive values.对与奖励相关的刺激的注意力反应可能在不知道其预测价值的情况下发生。
Behav Brain Res. 2018 Apr 2;341:26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.12.015. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
3
Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention.
基于价值的注意力优先级的泛化是特定于类别。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Oct;76(10):2401-2409. doi: 10.1177/17470218221144318. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
4
Pavlovian learning in the selection history-dependent control of overt spatial attention.在依赖选择历史的外显空间注意控制中,巴甫洛夫式学习。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Aug;48(8):783-789. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001030. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
5
The past, present, and future of selection history.选择史的过去、现在和未来。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Nov;130:326-350. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
6
An interoceptive basis for alcohol priming effects.酒精启动效应的内感受基础。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021 Jun;238(6):1621-1631. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-05796-w. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
7
Semantic generalization of value-based attentional priority.基于价值的注意力优先级的语义泛化。
Learn Mem. 2019 Nov 15;26(12):460-464. doi: 10.1101/lm.050336.119. Print 2019 Dec.
选择历史:奖励如何调节视觉注意的选择性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Apr;25(2):514-538. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1380-y.
4
Miss it and miss out: Counterproductive nonspatial attentional capture by task-irrelevant, value-related stimuli.错过它就会错失良机:与任务无关但与价值相关的刺激对非空间注意力的反生产性捕获。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Aug;79(6):1628-1642. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1346-1.
5
Predictive but not emotional value of Pavlovian stimuli leads to pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer.巴甫洛夫式刺激的预测价值而非情感价值会导致巴甫洛夫式到工具性的转换。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Mar 15;321:214-222. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.12.022. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
6
Regressive research: The pitfalls of post hoc data selection in the study of unconscious mental processes.回归性研究:无意识心理过程研究中事后数据选择的陷阱。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):752-775. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1170-y.
7
What is abnormal about addiction-related attentional biases?与成瘾相关的注意力偏差有哪些异常之处?
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Oct 1;167:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
8
How Does Awareness Modulate Goal-Directed and Stimulus-Driven Shifts of Attention Triggered by Value Learning?意识如何调节由价值学习引发的目标导向和刺激驱动的注意力转移?
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 2;11(8):e0160469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160469. eCollection 2016.
9
Subliminal or not? Comparing null-hypothesis and Bayesian methods for testing subliminal priming.是否为阈下效应?比较用于检验阈下启动效应的零假设方法和贝叶斯方法。
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Aug;44:29-40. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
10
Mechanisms of habitual approach: Failure to suppress irrelevant responses evoked by previously reward-associated stimuli.习惯性趋近的机制:无法抑制先前与奖励相关的刺激所引发的无关反应。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Jun;145(6):796-805. doi: 10.1037/xge0000169. Epub 2016 Apr 7.