Suppr超能文献

四种用于识别老年患者椎体脆性骨折的技术的比较效果

Comparative effectiveness of four techniques for identifying vertebral fragility fractures among elderly patients.

作者信息

Ma Hui-Ya, Zhang Ren-Jie, Zhou Lu-Ping, Wang Yan-Xin, Wang Jia-Qi, Shen Cai-Liang, Zhang Xiu-Jun

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Health Management & Checkup Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun;35(6):3673-3685. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11292-4. Epub 2024 Dec 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of vertebral fragile fractures peaked among the elderly population, and identifying individuals at high risk of vertebral fractures and promptly instituting preventions are of critical importance. This study aims to determine the efficacy and values of Hounsfield unit (HU) values, vertebral bone quality (VBQ) scores, bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) to discriminate between patients with and without vertebral fractures.

METHODS

A thorough search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wan Fang Database to identify potential studies that met the eligibility criteria. Studies that evaluated the utility of HU values, VBQ scores, QCT-measured BMD, and DXA-measured BMD in discriminating vertebral fractures were qualified.

RESULTS

The combined results showed that there were significant differences in HU values, VBQ scores, QCT-measured BMD, and DXA-measured BMD between the fracture and non-fracture groups. Moreover, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of HU values were 0.82, 0.67, and 0.76, respectively; the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of VBQ scores were 0.70, 0.75, and 0.78; the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of QCT-measured BMD were 0.85, 0.76 and 0.88.

CONCLUSION

All four methods, namely HU values, VBQ scores, QCT-measured BMD, and DXA-measured BMD can effectively distinguish between patients with and without vertebral fragile fractures. Among these, QCT-measured BMD exhibited a relatively high efficacy in discriminating vertebral fractures. VBQ scores and HU values demonstrated comparable efficacy for discriminating vertebral fractures among elderly patients.

KEY POINTS

Question Can four different imaging modalities effectively discriminate vertebral fragility fracture status among elderly patients? Findings These methods can effectively distinguish vertebral fractures status among elderly patients, and quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-measured bone mineral density (BMD) exhibited a relatively high efficacy. Clinical relevance The clinical applications of Hounsfield unit values, vertebral bone quality scores, and BMD measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and QCT show promising outcomes in identifying individuals at high risk of vertebral fractures.

摘要

目的

椎体脆性骨折的发病率在老年人群中达到峰值,识别椎体骨折高危个体并及时采取预防措施至关重要。本研究旨在确定霍夫曼单位(HU)值、椎体骨质量(VBQ)评分、双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量的骨密度(BMD)以及定量计算机断层扫描(QCT)在区分有和无椎体骨折患者方面的有效性和价值。

方法

全面检索了PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、科学网、中国知网和万方数据库,以识别符合纳入标准的潜在研究。评估HU值、VBQ评分、QCT测量的BMD和DXA测量的BMD在区分椎体骨折方面效用的研究符合要求。

结果

综合结果显示,骨折组和非骨折组在HU值、VBQ评分、QCT测量的BMD和DXA测量的BMD方面存在显著差异。此外,HU值的合并敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.82、0.67和0.76;VBQ评分的合并敏感性、特异性和AUC分别为0.70、0.75和0.78;QCT测量的BMD的合并敏感性、特异性和AUC分别为0.85、0.76和0.88。

结论

HU值、VBQ评分、QCT测量的BMD和DXA测量的BMD这四种方法均能有效区分有和无椎体脆性骨折的患者。其中,QCT测量的BMD在区分椎体骨折方面表现出相对较高的有效性。VBQ评分和HU值在区分老年患者椎体骨折方面显示出相当的有效性。

要点

问题 四种不同的成像方式能否有效区分老年患者的椎体脆性骨折状态?发现 这些方法能有效区分老年患者的椎体骨折状态,且定量计算机断层扫描(QCT)测量的骨密度(BMD)表现出相对较高的有效性。临床意义 霍夫曼单位值、椎体骨质量评分以及双能X线吸收法和QCT测量的BMD在临床应用中,在识别椎体骨折高危个体方面显示出良好前景。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验