Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Clinical Research Centre, Block MD11, Level 2,10 Medical Drive, Singapore 117597.
Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Tahir Foundation Building, National University of Singapore, 12 Science Drive 2 #10-01, Singapore 117549; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Aust Crit Care. 2020 Jan;33(1):54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
Despite the widespread implementation of medical emergency teams (METs) in hospitals to provide immediate interventions to deteriorating ward patients, little is known about how junior doctors and nurses escalate care for deteriorating ward patients in hospitals with established MET services.
The objective of this research study was to explore the experiences of junior doctors and nurses in escalating care for clinically deteriorating patients in general wards.
Twenty-four individual interviews were conducted with 10 junior doctors and 14 registered nurses of a 1000-bed acute general hospital with the most established MET service in Singapore. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using an interpretive thematic analysis approach.
Three salient themes emerged from thematic analysis: (1) MET activations versus the primary team doctors' reviews, (2) challenges in obtaining medical reviews, and (3) unspoken rules of the escalation of care. Participants' decisions to call the MET or to escalate to the primary team doctors not only depended on the severity of a patient's deterioration and their perceptions of the primary team doctors' capacity to manage the patient but also were largely influenced by sociocultural factors that were shaped by the hierarchy of medical professions. Key challenges faced by nurses in obtaining medical reviews from junior doctors for patients with early deterioration included presenting "convincing" evidence of patient deterioration and "packaging" information about patient deterioration.
The decision to call a MET or the primary team doctors is a complex judgement that is greatly influenced by the dynamics of perceived hierarchy between the medicine and nursing professions and within the medicine profession. Educational and organisational changes that enhance doctor-nurse interprofessional and intraprofessional collaboration among all levels of doctors may improve the process of the escalation of care for deteriorating patients and thus improve patient safety for hospitalised patients.
尽管医疗机构已广泛实施医疗应急小组(MET)以对病房内病情恶化的患者提供即时干预,但对于已建立 MET 服务的医院中,初级医生和护士如何为病情恶化的病房患者升级护理知之甚少。
本研究旨在探讨初级医生和护士在为普通病房内临床恶化的患者升级护理方面的经验。
对新加坡一家拥有最成熟 MET 服务的 1000 张病床急性综合医院的 10 名初级医生和 14 名注册护士进行了 24 次单独访谈。访谈逐字记录,并采用解释性主题分析方法进行分析。
主题分析产生了三个突出的主题:(1)MET 激活与主治医生的审查,(2)获取医疗审查的挑战,以及(3)护理升级的不成文规则。参与者决定调用 MET 或升级到主治医生,不仅取决于患者恶化的严重程度以及他们对主治医生管理患者能力的看法,而且还受到医疗职业等级结构塑造的社会文化因素的极大影响。护士在为早期恶化的患者从初级医生那里获得医疗审查时面临的主要挑战包括提供患者恶化的“令人信服”证据和“包装”患者恶化的信息。
决定是否调用 MET 或主治医生是一个复杂的判断,很大程度上受到医学和护理专业之间以及医学专业内部感知等级制度动态的影响。加强各级医生之间的医生-护士跨专业和专业内合作的教育和组织变革,可能会改善恶化患者护理升级的过程,从而提高住院患者的安全性。