Suppr超能文献

搭建文化桥梁以优化患者护理:对护士主导的快速反应团队的定性研究

A Bridge Between Cultures for Better Patient Care: A Qualitative Study of the Nurse-Led Rapid Response Team.

作者信息

Róin Tóra, Axelsen Matilde S, Bunkenborg Gitte

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.

Research Support Unit, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Caring Sci. 2025 Sep;39(3):e70064. doi: 10.1111/scs.70064.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Rapid Response Teams (RRTs) are crucial for patient safety, yet their effectiveness hinges on organisational factors, clinical culture, inter-professional collaboration and ward nurse attitudes. Understanding ward nurses' perceptions is vital for optimising RRT impact on patient care and safety culture.

AIMS

This study aimed to explore general ward registered nurses' perceptions of nurse-led RRTs, focusing on their collaborative experiences and reasons for team activation.

METHODS

A qualitative exploratory design was employed. Focus group interviews were conducted with 22 general ward nurses across three Danish hospitals, recruited via purposive sampling. A semi-structured interview guide facilitated discussions. Interpretive content analysis with a hermeneutical approach was used to identify key themes.

RESULTS

Participants expressed a predominantly positive perception of RRTs, encapsulated in the core theme: 'A vital and dynamic resource, benefitting patient care and nursing practice'. Key categories included: 'Perceiving patient safety as the main purpose of RRT', 'Supporting nurses' sense of security', 'Delivering practical assistance and teaching', 'Providing patient-centred care' and 'Fostering constructive communication and collaboration'. Nurses found experienced physicians supportive but expressed greater confidence in RRT-nurses compared to junior physicians. Frustration with a lack of physician involvement in treatment limitation and end-of-life care discussions was also noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurse-led RRTs are valued by ward nurses, providing essential support and bridging multidisciplinary collaboration and communication. However, limitations in the RRT's teaching role suggest a need for supplementary educational strategies. Shared decision-making regarding treatment limitation and end-of-life care is crucial for maximising RRT benefits.

LIMITATIONS

Findings may have limited transferability due to the study's specific healthcare context.

摘要

引言

快速反应小组(RRTs)对患者安全至关重要,但其有效性取决于组织因素、临床文化、跨专业协作和病房护士的态度。了解病房护士的看法对于优化RRT对患者护理和安全文化的影响至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在探讨普通病房注册护士对护士主导的RRT的看法,重点关注他们的协作经验和团队启动的原因。

方法

采用定性探索性设计。通过目的抽样法,对丹麦三家医院的22名普通病房护士进行了焦点小组访谈。使用半结构化访谈指南促进讨论。采用诠释学方法进行解释性内容分析,以确定关键主题。

结果

参与者对RRTs表达了主要为积极的看法,核心主题为:“一项至关重要且充满活力的资源,有益于患者护理和护理实践”。关键类别包括:“将患者安全视为RRT的主要目的”、“增强护士的安全感”、“提供实际帮助和教学”、“提供以患者为中心的护理”以及“促进建设性的沟通与协作”。护士们发现经验丰富的医生很支持,但与初级医生相比,他们对RRT护士更有信心。还指出了对医生在治疗限制和临终关怀讨论中缺乏参与感到沮丧。

结论

护士主导的RRTs受到病房护士的重视,提供了重要支持,并架起了多学科协作与沟通的桥梁。然而,RRT教学角色的局限性表明需要补充教育策略。在治疗限制和临终关怀方面进行共同决策对于最大化RRT的益处至关重要。

局限性

由于该研究特定的医疗背景,研究结果的可转移性可能有限。

相似文献

2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Experiences of registered nurses as managers and leaders in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review.
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Dec;9(4):388-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00239.x.
6
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
8
Experiences of gynecological cancer patients receiving care from specialist nurses: a qualitative systematic review.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Aug;15(8):2087-2112. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003126.
10
Experiences of and support for nurses as second victims of adverse nursing errors: a qualitative systematic review.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Sep;15(9):2333-2364. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003254.

本文引用的文献

2
A systematic review of the facilitators and barriers to rapid response team activation.
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2024 Apr;21(2):148-157. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12700. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
4
Frontline Nurses' clinical judgment in recognizing, understanding, and responding to patient deterioration: A qualitative study.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Mar;139:104436. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104436. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
5
The influence of physician-nurse collaboration on patient safety culture.
Heliyon. 2022 Sep 16;8(9):e10649. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10649. eCollection 2022 Sep.
8
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114523. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
9
The future of hospital quality of care policy: A multi-stakeholder discrete choice experiment in Flanders, Belgium.
Health Policy. 2021 Dec;125(12):1565-1573. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
10
Strategies for successful implementation and permanent maintenance of a rapid response system.
Korean J Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(5):1031-1039. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.693. Epub 2021 Aug 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验