David G Cogan Laboratory of Ophthalmic Pathology, Boston, MA, USA; Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
David G Cogan Laboratory of Ophthalmic Pathology, Boston, MA, USA; Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Surv Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul-Aug;64(4):558-569. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
We describe the clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical characteristics of episcleral/conjunctival pseudorheumatoid nodulosis, a new granulomatous entity that belongs among a group of related lesions. Specifically, pseudorheumatoid nodulosis should be differentiated from solitary rheumatoid nodules, rheumatoid nodulosis, accelerated rheumatoid nodules and nodulosis, and solitary pseudorheumatoid nodules. A 53-year-old man presented with bilateral painless, large, faintly yellow-gray, partially immobile, solid, circumscribed, and occasionally confluent episcleral nodules of several months' duration. He had never had clinical rheumatoid arthritis and was rheumatoid factor negative. Biopsy revealed multiple, merging episcleral/conjunctival, nonulcerated, palisading granulomas with variably sized central zones of necrobiosis of collagen. Abundant palisading CD68/163 + histiocytes admixed with fibroblasts surrounded the necrobiotic foci, which failed to stain with Alcian blue for mucopolysaccharides. No fibrinoid deposits were detected. Numerous CD3+ T lymphocytes, fewer CD 20 + B lymphocytes, and a smaller subpopulation of CD138 + plasma cells were present. Numerous CD1a + Langerhans cells were scattered among the palisading histiocytes and overlying epithelium. Immunohistochemical stains for immunoglobulins revealed concentrations of IgG, IgM, and IgA, but not IgE, in the necrobiotic zones. Special stains did not reveal evidence of infection nor did polarization microscopy display any foreign material. An extensive systemic and serologic workup was negative. We review simulating palisading or other nonrheumatic granulomas that should be distinguished from pseudorheumatoid nodules or nodulosis and explore therapeutic options.
我们描述了巩膜/结膜假类风湿性结节病的临床、组织病理学和免疫组织化学特征,这是一种新的肉芽肿性实体,属于一组相关病变。具体来说,假类风湿性结节病应与孤立性类风湿结节、类风湿结节病、加速性类风湿结节和结节病以及孤立性假类风湿性结节相区别。一名 53 岁男性出现双侧无痛、大、淡灰色、部分不活动、实性、界限清楚、偶尔融合的巩膜结节,病程数月。他从未出现过临床类风湿关节炎,类风湿因子阴性。活检显示多个融合的巩膜/结膜、非溃疡性、栅栏状肉芽肿,伴有大小不一的胶原坏死中央区。大量栅栏状 CD68/163+组织细胞与成纤维细胞混合,围绕着坏死灶,阿辛蓝染色未能显示粘多糖。未检测到纤维蛋白样沉积物。存在大量 CD3+T 淋巴细胞、较少的 CD20+B 淋巴细胞和较小的 CD138+浆细胞亚群。大量 CD1a+朗格汉斯细胞散布在栅栏状组织细胞和上皮细胞之间。免疫球蛋白的免疫组织化学染色显示在坏死区有 IgG、IgM 和 IgA,但没有 IgE 的浓度。特殊染色未显示感染的证据,偏振显微镜也未显示任何异物。广泛的系统和血清学检查均为阴性。我们回顾了模拟栅栏状或其他非风湿性肉芽肿的病变,这些病变应与假类风湿性结节或结节病相区别,并探讨了治疗选择。