• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对医疗体系中所有年轻人进行群体基因组筛查:成本效益分析。

Population genomic screening of all young adults in a health-care system: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, PR China.

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2019 Sep;21(9):1958-1968. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0457-6. Epub 2019 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1038/s41436-019-0457-6
PMID:30773532
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6752319/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To consider the impact and cost-effectiveness of offering preventive population genomic screening to all young adults in a single-payer health-care system.

METHODS

We modeled screening of 2,688,192 individuals, all adults aged 18-25 years in Australia, for pathogenic variants in BRCA1/BRCA2/MLH1/MSH2 genes, and carrier screening for cystic fibrosis (CF), spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), and fragile X syndrome (FXS), at 71% testing uptake using per-test costs ranging from AUD$200 to $1200 (~USD$140 to $850). Investment costs included genetic counseling, surveillance, and interventions (reimbursed only) for at-risk individuals/couples. Cost-effectiveness was defined below AUD$50,000/DALY (disability-adjusted life year) prevented, using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), compared with current targeted testing. Outcomes were cancer incidence/mortality, disease cases, and treatment costs reduced.

RESULTS

Population screening would reduce variant-attributable cancers by 28.8%, cancer deaths by 31.2%, and CF/SMA/FXS cases by 24.8%, compared with targeted testing. Assuming AUD$400 per test, investment required would be between 4 and 5 times higher than current expenditure. However, screening would lead to substantial savings in medical costs and DALYs prevented, at a highly cost-effective ICER of AUD$4038/DALY. At AUD$200 per test, screening would approach cost-saving for the health system (ICER = AUD$22/DALY).

CONCLUSION

Preventive genomic screening in early adulthood would be highly cost-effective in a single-payer health-care system, but ethical issues must be considered.

摘要

目的

探讨在单一支付者医疗保健系统中为所有年轻成年人提供预防性群体基因组筛查的影响和成本效益。

方法

我们对澳大利亚所有 18-25 岁成年人进行了 BRCA1/BRCA2/MLH1/MSH2 基因致病性变异和囊性纤维化(CF)、脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)、脆性 X 综合征(FXS)携带者筛查的建模,检测率为 71%,使用 200 至 1200 澳元(140 至 850 美元)不等的单次检测成本。投资成本包括对有风险的个体/夫妇进行基因咨询、监测和干预(仅报销)。与当前的靶向检测相比,使用增量成本效益比(ICER),将成本效益定义为低于 50000 澳元(残疾调整生命年)/预防的 DALY。结果为癌症发病率/死亡率、疾病病例和治疗费用降低。

结果

与靶向检测相比,人群筛查可将变异相关癌症减少 28.8%,癌症死亡减少 31.2%,CF/SMA/FXS 减少 24.8%。假设每次检测费用为 400 澳元,投资需求将比目前的支出高出 4 至 5 倍。然而,筛查将导致医疗成本和预防 DALY 的大量节省,具有高度成本效益的 ICER 为 4038 澳元/DALY。每次检测费用为 200 澳元,筛查对卫生系统将接近成本节约(ICER=22 澳元/DALY)。

结论

在单一支付者医疗保健系统中,对年轻人进行预防性基因组筛查具有很高的成本效益,但必须考虑伦理问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cfe/6752319/8e3ec95d37c8/41436_2019_457_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cfe/6752319/d90a8890e8b0/41436_2019_457_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cfe/6752319/d9e8185a719e/41436_2019_457_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cfe/6752319/dec18f346d51/41436_2019_457_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cfe/6752319/8e3ec95d37c8/41436_2019_457_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cfe/6752319/d90a8890e8b0/41436_2019_457_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cfe/6752319/d9e8185a719e/41436_2019_457_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cfe/6752319/dec18f346d51/41436_2019_457_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cfe/6752319/8e3ec95d37c8/41436_2019_457_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Population genomic screening of all young adults in a health-care system: a cost-effectiveness analysis.对医疗体系中所有年轻人进行群体基因组筛查:成本效益分析。
Genet Med. 2019 Sep;21(9):1958-1968. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0457-6. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
2
Reproductive genetic carrier screening for cystic fibrosis, fragile X syndrome, and spinal muscular atrophy in Australia: outcomes of 12,000 tests.澳大利亚囊性纤维化、脆性 X 综合征和脊髓性肌萎缩症的生殖遗传携带者筛查:12000 次检测的结果。
Genet Med. 2018 Apr;20(5):513-523. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.134. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
3
Carrier Screening Programs for Cystic Fibrosis, Fragile X Syndrome, Hemoglobinopathies and Thalassemia, and Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Health Technology Assessment.囊性纤维化、脆性 X 综合征、血红蛋白病和地中海贫血、脊髓性肌萎缩症携带者筛查计划:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2023 Aug 10;23(4):1-398. eCollection 2023.
4
Combined population genomic screening for three high-risk conditions in Australia: a modelling study.澳大利亚三种高危疾病的联合人群基因组筛查:一项建模研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Nov 8;66:102297. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102297. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Reproductive genetic carrier screening for cystic fibrosis, fragile X syndrome and spinal muscular atrophy: patterns of community and healthcare provider participation in a Victorian screening program.囊性纤维化、脆性X综合征和脊髓性肌萎缩症的生殖遗传携带者筛查:维多利亚州筛查项目中社区和医疗服务提供者的参与模式
Aust J Prim Health. 2022 Dec;28(6):580-587. doi: 10.1071/PY21247.
6
Making a (cautious) case for expanding reproductive genetic carrier screens: Australian researchers report success, and caveats, with a simultaneous panel of cystic fibrosis, fragile X syndrome, and spinal muscular atrophy.为扩大生殖基因携带者筛查提出(谨慎的)理由:澳大利亚研究人员报告了对囊性纤维化、脆性X综合征和脊髓性肌萎缩症进行联合检测的成功案例及注意事项。
Am J Med Genet A. 2018 Mar;176(3):510-512. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38643.
7
Cost-effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Women at Familial Risk.家族性乳腺癌风险女性的磁共振成像乳腺癌筛查的成本效益分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;6(9):1381-1389. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2922.
8
Population genomic screening of young adults for familial hypercholesterolaemia: a cost-effectiveness analysis.对年轻人进行家族性高胆固醇血症的群体基因组筛查:成本效益分析。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Sep 7;43(34):3243-3254. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab770.
9
Economic evaluation of population-based, expanded reproductive carrier screening for genetic diseases in Australia.基于人群的、扩展的遗传性疾病生殖载体筛查的经济学评价:澳大利亚。
Genet Med. 2023 May;25(5):100813. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100813. Epub 2023 Feb 12.
10
Cost Effectiveness of Risk-Reducing Mastectomy versus Surveillance in BRCA Mutation Carriers with a History of Ovarian Cancer.BRCA 基因突变携带者伴卵巢癌病史行预防性乳房切除术与监测的成本效果比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(11):3116-3123. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5995-z. Epub 2017 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of population-based expanded reproductive carrier screening for genetic diseases in Australia: a microsimulation analysis.澳大利亚基于人群的扩大遗传性疾病生殖携带者筛查的成本效益:微观模拟分析
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1038/s41431-025-01835-8.
2
Understanding Genetic Screening: Harnessing Health Information to Prevent Disease Risks.了解基因筛查:利用健康信息预防疾病风险。
Int J Med Sci. 2025 Jan 21;22(4):903-919. doi: 10.7150/ijms.101219. eCollection 2025.
3
Using a behaviour-change approach to support uptake of population genomic screening and management options for breast or prostate cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Exome Sequencing-Based Screening for BRCA1/2 Expected Pathogenic Variants Among Adult Biobank Participants.基于外显子组测序的成人生物库参与者中 BRCA1/2 预期致病性变异的筛查。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e182140. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2140.
2
Recall by genotype and cascade screening for familial hypercholesterolemia in a population-based biobank from Estonia.依基因型召回和级联筛查法在爱沙尼亚人群生物库中检测家族性高胆固醇血症
Genet Med. 2019 May;21(5):1173-1180. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0311-2. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
3
Population-based genetic testing of asymptomatic women for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility.
采用行为改变方法来支持乳腺癌或前列腺癌群体基因组筛查及管理方案的应用。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Jan;33(1):108-120. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01729-1. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
4
Economic Evaluation of Population-Based BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing in Canada.基于人群的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 检测在加拿大的经济评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432725. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32725.
5
Evaluating the utility of multi-gene, multi-disease population-based panel testing accounting for uncertainty in penetrance estimates.评估基于人群的多基因、多疾病组合检测在考虑外显率估计不确定性时的效用。
NPJ Genom Med. 2024 May 17;9(1):30. doi: 10.1038/s41525-024-00414-y.
6
Economic evaluation of germline genetic testing for breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.中低收入国家乳腺癌种系基因检测的经济评价:系统综述。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Mar 7;24(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12038-7.
7
Screening and prevention of ovarian cancer.卵巢癌的筛查与预防。
Med J Aust. 2024 Mar 18;220(5):264-274. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52227. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
8
Combined population genomic screening for three high-risk conditions in Australia: a modelling study.澳大利亚三种高危疾病的联合人群基因组筛查:一项建模研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Nov 8;66:102297. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102297. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Building a vertically integrated genomic learning health system: The biobank at the Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine.建立一个垂直整合的基因组学学习健康系统:科罗拉多个性化医学中心的生物银行。
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Jan 4;111(1):11-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.12.001.
10
Carrier Screening Programs for Cystic Fibrosis, Fragile X Syndrome, Hemoglobinopathies and Thalassemia, and Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Health Technology Assessment.囊性纤维化、脆性 X 综合征、血红蛋白病和地中海贫血、脊髓性肌萎缩症携带者筛查计划:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2023 Aug 10;23(4):1-398. eCollection 2023.
基于人群的无症状女性乳腺癌和卵巢癌易感性的遗传检测。
Genet Med. 2019 Apr;21(4):913-922. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0277-0. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
4
A Model for Genome-First Care: Returning Secondary Genomic Findings to Participants and Their Healthcare Providers in a Large Research Cohort.基于基因组的医疗模式:在大型研究队列中向参与者及其医疗保健提供者返还次要的基因组研究结果。
Am J Hum Genet. 2018 Sep 6;103(3):328-337. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
5
Current detection rates and time-to-detection of all identifiable carriers in the Greater London population.大伦敦地区所有可识别携带者的当前检出率和检出时间。
J Med Genet. 2018 Aug;55(8):538-545. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-105195. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
6
Cost-effectiveness of Population-Based BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1, PALB2 Mutation Testing in Unselected General Population Women.基于人群的 BRCA1、BRCA2、RAD51C、RAD51D、BRIP1、PALB2 基因突变检测在未选择的普通人群女性中的成本效益。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Jul 1;110(7):714-725. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx265.
7
Cost-effectiveness and comparative effectiveness of cancer risk management strategies in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: a systematic review.BRCA1/2 基因突变携带者的癌症风险管理策略的成本效益和比较效果:系统评价。
Genet Med. 2018 Oct;20(10):1145-1156. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.255. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
8
Should Australia Ban the Use of Genetic Test Results in Life Insurance?澳大利亚应该禁止在人寿保险中使用基因检测结果吗?
Front Public Health. 2017 Dec 13;5:330. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00330. eCollection 2017.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of germ-line BRCA testing in women with breast cancer and cascade testing in family members of mutation carriers.BRCA 种系检测在乳腺癌女性患者中的成本效益分析,以及突变携带者家族成员的级联检测。
Genet Med. 2018 Sep;20(9):985-994. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.231. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
10
Which Lynch syndrome screening programs could be implemented in the "real world"? A systematic review of economic evaluations.哪些林奇综合征筛查方案可以在“现实世界”中实施?一项经济评估的系统综述。
Genet Med. 2018 Oct;20(10):1131-1144. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.244. Epub 2018 Jan 4.