Suppr超能文献

探讨临终关怀中的姑息性镇静:患者参与的频率、时机和相关因素。

Discussions about palliative sedation in hospice: Frequency, timing and factors associated with patient involvement.

机构信息

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 May;28(3):e13019. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13019. Epub 2019 Feb 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether and when palliative sedation was discussed with hospice patients with cancer and/or with their families and factors associated with patient involvement in such discussions.

METHODS

Medical records of all patients with cancer who died in an Italian hospice in 2014-2015 (N = 326) were retrospectively reviewed. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the association between patients' characteristics and palliative sedation discussion with the patient versus palliative sedation discussion only with the family.

RESULTS

Palliative sedation discussion was in 51.8% of the cases reported in the record. In most of the cases, discussions were conducted pre-emptively. Palliative sedation was used for 67.3% of the patients who were involved in the discussion and for 32.7% of the patients when the topic was discussed only with the family. Patient involvement in palliative sedation discussions was negatively associated with living with others (OR 0.34, CI 0.15; 0.77), and positively associated with awareness of prognosis (OR 5.61, CI 2.19; 14.33) and days of survival after hospice admission (OR 3.41, CI 1.55; 7.51).

CONCLUSION

Policies encouraging patient involvement in palliative care decision-making, including palliative sedation, should be implemented and their adoption should be carefully examined. Prospective studies addressing this topic are needed.

摘要

目的

调查姑息镇静治疗是否以及何时与癌症临终患者及其家属进行讨论,以及哪些因素与患者参与此类讨论有关。

方法

回顾性分析 2014-2015 年期间在意大利一家临终关怀机构死亡的所有癌症患者(N=326)的病历。采用多因素逻辑回归分析评估患者特征与姑息镇静治疗讨论中患者参与度(与患者讨论或仅与家属讨论)之间的关系。

结果

记录中报告了 51.8%的姑息镇静治疗讨论案例。大多数情况下,讨论是预先进行的。参与讨论的患者中,有 67.3%的患者使用了姑息镇静治疗,而仅与家属讨论该话题的患者中有 32.7%的患者使用了姑息镇静治疗。患者参与姑息镇静治疗讨论与与他人同住(OR 0.34,CI 0.15;0.77)呈负相关,与对预后的认识(OR 5.61,CI 2.19;14.33)和入住临终关怀机构后存活天数(OR 3.41,CI 1.55;7.51)呈正相关。

结论

应实施鼓励患者参与姑息治疗决策(包括姑息镇静治疗)的政策,并应仔细审查其采用情况。需要开展前瞻性研究来解决这一问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验