Sepsis-3: How useful is the new definition?
作者信息
Sinha Sharmili, Ray Banambar
机构信息
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Apollo Hospitals, Bhuabneswar, Odisha, India.
出版信息
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Oct-Dec;34(4):542-543. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_335_16.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Sepsis-3: How useful is the new definition?《脓毒症-3：新定义的实用性如何？》
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Oct-Dec;34(4):542-543. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_335_16.
2
Implications of the new sepsis definition on research and practice.新的脓毒症定义对研究和实践的影响。
J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:259-262. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.11.032. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
3
Back to Basics: Recognition of Sepsis with New Definition.回归基础：基于新定义的脓毒症识别
J Clin Med. 2019 Nov 1;8(11):1838. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111838.
4
[SOMETHING ABOUT DEFINITION AND EPIDEMIOLOGY OF SEPSIS].[关于脓毒症的定义与流行病学的某些内容]
Acta Med Croatica. 2015 Sep;69(3):125-34.
5
[New definition of and diagnostic criteria for sepsis - Swedish use of Sepsis-3].[脓毒症的新定义及诊断标准——瑞典对脓毒症-3的应用]
Lakartidningen. 2018 Mar 26;115:E3W9.
6
The new sepsis definition: limitations and contribution to research and diagnosis of sepsis.新的脓毒症定义：脓毒症研究与诊断的局限性及贡献
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Apr;30(2):200-204. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000446.
7
[Sepsis - how to recognize and what to focus on - back to basics in the light of the new definition].[脓毒症——如何识别以及关注重点——基于新定义回归基础]
Vnitr Lek. 2016 Fall;62(7-8):568-74.
8
Comparison of International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference Versus Sepsis-3 Definitions for Children Presenting With Septic Shock to a Tertiary Care Center in India: A Retrospective Study.国际儿科脓毒症共识会议与脓毒症-3 定义在印度一家三级护理中心用于诊断感染性休克患儿的比较：一项回顾性研究。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;20(3):e122-e129. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001864.
9
Application of a simplified definition of diastolic function in severe sepsis and septic shock.简化舒张功能定义在严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克中的应用。
Crit Care. 2016 Aug 4;20(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1421-3.
10
[New Sepsis-3 definition : Do we have to treat sepsis before we can diagnose it from now on?].[新的脓毒症-3定义：从现在起，我们必须在诊断脓毒症之前就进行治疗吗？]
Anaesthesist. 2017 Aug;66(8):614-621. doi: 10.1007/s00101-017-0316-2.
引用本文的文献
1
Sepsis-3 criteria in AmsterdamUMCdb: open-source code implementation.阿姆斯特丹大学医学中心数据库中的脓毒症-3标准：开源代码实现
GigaByte. 2022 Mar 15;2022:gigabyte45. doi: 10.46471/gigabyte.45. eCollection 2022.
2
Septic shock 3.0 criteria application in severe COVID-19 patients: An unattended sepsis population with high mortality risk.脓毒性休克3.0标准在重症新型冠状病毒肺炎患者中的应用：一个死亡率风险高的未得到关注的脓毒症群体。
World J Crit Care Med. 2022 Jul 9;11(4):246-254. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v11.i4.246.
3
Postoperative sepsis after colorectal surgery: a prospective single-center observational study and review of the literature.结直肠手术后的术后脓毒症：一项前瞻性单中心观察性研究及文献综述
Prz Gastroenterol. 2022;17(1):47-51. doi: 10.5114/pg.2021.106083. Epub 2021 May 23.
4
Survival prediction of patients with sepsis from age, sex, and septic episode number alone.仅根据年龄、性别和感染发作次数预测脓毒症患者的生存情况。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 13;10(1):17156. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73558-3.
5
Presenting Symptoms in Sepsis: Is the Mnemonic "SEPSIS" Useful?脓毒症的症状表现：助记符“SEPSIS”有用吗？
Infect Drug Resist. 2020 Jul 8;13:2199-2204. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S263964. eCollection 2020.
本文引用的文献
1
Intensive Care in India: The Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study.印度的重症监护：印度重症监护病例组合与实践模式研究
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2016 Apr;20(4):216-25. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.180042.
2
New Sepsis Criteria: A Change We Should Not Make.新的脓毒症标准：一项我们不应做出的改变。
Chest. 2016 May;149(5):1117-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.653. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
3
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义（脓毒症-3）》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
4
Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).制定脓毒性休克的新定义并评估新的临床标准：用于第三次脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际共识定义（Sepsis-3）。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):775-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289.
Zotero 插件