Suppr超能文献

雾化吸入格隆溴铵/eFlow®封闭系统用于患有中度至重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病且存在心血管疾病风险因素患者的疗效与安全性

Efficacy and Safety of Nebulized Glycopyrrolate/eFlow® Closed System in Patients with Moderate-to-Very-Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Pre-Existing Cardiovascular Risk Factors.

作者信息

Ferguson Gary T, Tosiello Robert, Sanjar Shahin, Goodin Thomas

机构信息

Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills.

Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Marlborough, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2018 Dec 13;6(1):86-99. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.6.1.2018.0146.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of pre-existing cardiovascular (CV) risk factors on the efficacy and safety of nebulized glycopyrrolate (GLY) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A total of 2379 patients from 3 phase III studies (12-week, placebo-controlled Glycopyrrolate for Obstructive Lung Disease via Electronic Nebulizer [GOLDEN] -3 and -4, and 48-week, active-controlled GOLDEN-5) stratified by high (n=1526) or low (n=853) CV risk were randomized to placebo, GLY 25 mcg or 50 mcg twice daily, or tiotropium (TIO; 18 mcg once daily). Safety, lung function, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and exacerbations were assessed by CV risk. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar across CV risk subgroups, with serious TEAEs higher in the high CV risk subgroup. In the 12-week studies, discontinuation due to TEAEs with GLY 25 mcg and 50 mcg was similar between CV risk subgroups, and lower than placebo (high risk: 6.2%, 3.6%, 9.0%; low risk: 3.2%, 4.5%, 9.9%, respectively). In the 48-week, open-label study, discontinuation rates were higher with GLY versus TIO (high risk: 10.7%, 3.7%; low risk: 8.7%, 1.2%, respectively). Rates of CV events of special interest were similar across CV risk subgroups. Regardless of CV risk, GLY led to significant improvements in efficacy and PRO assessments at 12 weeks versus placebo, whereas changes were similar between GLY and TIO at 48 weeks, except for PROs in the low risk subgroup. Exacerbation rates were similar across all treatment groups. Nebulized GLY had an acceptable safety profile and improved lung function and PROs in COPD patients, irrespective of CV risk status.

摘要

本研究旨在评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中预先存在的心血管(CV)危险因素对雾化吸入格隆溴铵(GLY)疗效和安全性的影响。来自3项III期研究(12周、安慰剂对照的通过电子雾化器使用格隆溴铵治疗阻塞性肺病[GOLDEN]-3和-4,以及48周、活性药物对照的GOLDEN-5)的总共2379例患者,根据高CV风险(n=1526)或低CV风险(n=853)进行分层,随机分为安慰剂组、每日两次吸入25 mcg或50 mcg GLY组,或噻托溴铵(TIO;每日一次吸入18 mcg)组。通过CV风险评估安全性、肺功能、患者报告结局(PROs)和急性加重情况。治疗期间出现的不良事件(TEAEs)在CV风险亚组之间相似,严重TEAEs在高CV风险亚组中更高。在12周的研究中,因TEAEs而停用25 mcg和50 mcg GLY的情况在CV风险亚组之间相似,且低于安慰剂组(高风险组分别为6.2%、3.6%、9.0%;低风险组分别为3.2%、4.5%、9.9%)。在48周的开放标签研究中,GLY组的停药率高于TIO组(高风险组分别为10.7%、3.7%;低风险组分别为8.7%、1.2%)。各CV风险亚组中特别关注的CV事件发生率相似。无论CV风险如何,与安慰剂相比,GLY在12周时可显著改善疗效和PRO评估,而在48周时,GLY和TIO之间的变化相似,但低风险亚组中的PROs除外。所有治疗组的急性加重率相似。雾化吸入GLY具有可接受的安全性,并且无论CV风险状态如何,均可改善COPD患者的肺功能和PROs。

相似文献

7
An overview of glycopyrrolate/eFlow® CS in COPD.格隆溴铵/畅沛® CS 在 COPD 中的概述。
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2018 Jun;12(6):447-459. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2018.1476853. Epub 2018 May 28.

本文引用的文献

2
Annual progression of endothelial dysfunction in patients with COPD.COPD 患者内皮功能障碍的年度进展。
Respir Med. 2017 Nov;132:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
9
Cardiac effects of current treatments of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病治疗的心脏效应。
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Feb;4(2):149-64. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00518-4. Epub 2016 Jan 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验