• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Twice-Daily Glycopyrrolate Versus Placebo in Patients With COPD: The GEM2 Study.每日两次格隆溴铵对比安慰剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效和安全性:GEM2研究
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2016 Mar 28;3(2):549-559. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.3.2.2015.0157.
2
Efficacy and safety of twice-daily glycopyrrolate in patients with stable, symptomatic COPD with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation: the GEM1 study.每日两次格隆溴铵治疗稳定期、有症状的中重度气流受限慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效和安全性:GEM1研究
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Jun 8;11:1233-43. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S100445. eCollection 2016.
3
Efficacy and safety of glycopyrrolate in patients with COPD by reversibility: pooled analysis of GEM1 and GEM2 12-week studies.通过可逆性评估格隆溴铵在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的疗效和安全性:GEM1和GEM2 12周研究的汇总分析
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Feb 19;14:461-470. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S194102. eCollection 2019.
4
FLIGHT1 and FLIGHT2: Efficacy and Safety of QVA149 (Indacaterol/Glycopyrrolate) versus Its Monocomponents and Placebo in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.FLIGHT1 和 FLIGHT2 研究:茚达特罗/格隆溴铵(QVA149)对比其单药成分和安慰剂在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的疗效和安全性。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov 1;192(9):1068-79. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201505-1048OC.
5
Effect of smoking status on lung function, patient-reported outcomes, and safety among COPD patients treated with glycopyrrolate inhalation powder: pooled analysis of GEM1 and GEM2 studies.吸烟状况对格隆溴铵吸入粉治疗 COPD 患者的肺功能、患者报告结局和安全性的影响:GEM1 和 GEM2 研究的汇总分析。
Respir Res. 2019 Jul 2;20(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1112-0.
6
Efficacy and safety of glycopyrrolate/eFlow CS (nebulized glycopyrrolate) in moderate-to-very-severe COPD: Results from the glycopyrrolate for obstructive lung disease via electronic nebulizer (GOLDEN) 3 and 4 randomized controlled trials.格隆溴铵/eflow CS(雾化格隆溴铵)治疗中重度至极重度 COPD 的疗效和安全性:来自经电子雾化器给予格隆溴铵治疗阻塞性肺部疾病(GOLDEN)3 期和 4 期随机对照研究的结果。
Respir Med. 2017 Nov;132:238-250. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
7
Long-term safety of glycopyrrolate: A randomized study in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD (GEM3).格隆溴铵的长期安全性:一项针对中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的随机研究(GEM3)。
Respir Med. 2016 Jun;115:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
8
LANTERN: a randomized study of QVA149 versus salmeterol/fluticasone combination in patients with COPD.灯笼研究:一项关于QVA149与沙美特罗/氟替卡松联合用药治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的随机研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Jun 5;10:1015-26. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S84436. eCollection 2015.
9
The Effect of Baseline Rescue Medication Use on Efficacy and Safety of Nebulized Glycopyrrolate Treatment in Patients with COPD from the GOLDEN 3 and 4 Studies.《GOLDEN 研究 3 和 4 中基线急救药物使用对 COPD 患者使用吸入性格隆溴铵治疗的疗效和安全性的影响》。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Apr 14;15:745-754. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S242767. eCollection 2020.
10
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study of Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler Relative to Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Dry Powder Inhaler in COPD.一项关于甘罗溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗定量吸入气雾剂相对于乌美溴铵/维兰特罗干粉吸入剂治疗 COPD 的随机、双盲、双模拟研究。
Adv Ther. 2019 Sep;36(9):2434-2449. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01015-3. Epub 2019 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
AM/PM dosing of LAMA for COPD: a randomized controlled trial protocol using digital recruitment and registries.慢性阻塞性肺疾病长效抗胆碱能药物的早晚给药:一项使用数字招募和登记系统的随机对照试验方案
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 6;11:1430169. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1430169. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluation of Different Doses in Inhaled Therapy: A Comprehensive Analysis.吸入疗法中不同剂量的评估:综合分析
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Aug 26;15(9):2206. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15092206.
3
Real-World Safety and Efficacy of Glycopyrronium Bromide in Japanese Patients with COPD: A 52-Week Post-Marketing Surveillance.格隆溴铵在日本慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的真实世界安全性和有效性:一项52周的上市后监测
Open Respir Med J. 2022 Feb 8;16:e187430642112240. doi: 10.2174/18743064-v16-e2112240. eCollection 2022.
4
Mechanisms, Pathophysiology and Currently Proposed Treatments of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的发病机制、病理生理学及当前推荐的治疗方法
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Sep 26;14(10):979. doi: 10.3390/ph14100979.
5
Effect of smoking status on lung function, patient-reported outcomes, and safety among COPD patients treated with glycopyrrolate inhalation powder: pooled analysis of GEM1 and GEM2 studies.吸烟状况对格隆溴铵吸入粉治疗 COPD 患者的肺功能、患者报告结局和安全性的影响:GEM1 和 GEM2 研究的汇总分析。
Respir Res. 2019 Jul 2;20(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1112-0.
6
Efficacy and safety of glycopyrrolate in patients with COPD by reversibility: pooled analysis of GEM1 and GEM2 12-week studies.通过可逆性评估格隆溴铵在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的疗效和安全性:GEM1和GEM2 12周研究的汇总分析
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Feb 19;14:461-470. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S194102. eCollection 2019.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Nebulized Glycopyrrolate/eFlow® Closed System in Patients with Moderate-to-Very-Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Pre-Existing Cardiovascular Risk Factors.雾化吸入格隆溴铵/eFlow®封闭系统用于患有中度至重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病且存在心血管疾病风险因素患者的疗效与安全性
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2018 Dec 13;6(1):86-99. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.6.1.2018.0146.
8
Health-Related Quality of Life Improvements in Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients on Nebulized Glycopyrrolate: Evidence from the GOLDEN Studies.雾化吸入格隆溴铵对中重度至极重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者健康相关生活质量的改善作用:来自GOLDEN研究的证据
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2018 Jun 6;5(3):193-207. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.5.3.2017.0178.
9
Inhaled glycopyrrolate for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.吸入用格隆溴铵治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Jun 12;13:1873-1888. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S162646. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Umeclidinium for treating COPD: an evaluation of pharmacologic properties, safety and clinical use.用于治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的乌美溴铵:药理特性、安全性及临床应用评估
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014 Nov;13(11):1555-61. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2014.968550. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
2
Minimal clinically important differences in pharmacological trials.药理学试验中的最小临床重要差异。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Feb 1;189(3):250-5. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201310-1863PP.
3
Once daily glycopyrronium for the treatment of COPD: pooled analysis of the GLOW1 and GLOW2 studies.每日一次格隆溴铵治疗 COPD:GLOW1 和 GLOW2 研究的汇总分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Mar;30(3):493-508. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.858618. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
4
ACCORD COPD II: a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the 12-week efficacy and safety of twice-daily aclidinium bromide in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.ACCORD慢性阻塞性肺疾病研究II:一项评估每日两次使用阿地溴铵治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者12周疗效和安全性的随机临床试验。
Clin Drug Investig. 2013 Dec;33(12):893-904. doi: 10.1007/s40261-013-0138-1.
5
A novel model-based approach for dose determination of glycopyrronium bromide in COPD.一种新型基于模型的方法用于确定 COPD 中溴化吡丙隆的剂量。
BMC Pulm Med. 2012 Dec 8;12:74. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-12-74.
6
Efficacy and safety of NVA237 versus placebo and tiotropium in patients with COPD: the GLOW2 study.NVA237 与安慰剂和噻托溴铵治疗 COPD 患者的疗效和安全性:GLOW2 研究。
Eur Respir J. 2012 Nov;40(5):1106-14. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00040712. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
7
Once-daily glycopyrronium bromide, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review of clinical benefit.每日一次的溴化格隆铵,一种长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂,用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病:临床获益的系统评价。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2012;7:673-8. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S35990. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
8
Efficacy and safety of once-daily NVA237 in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD: the GLOW1 trial.每日一次 NVA237 治疗中重度 COPD 患者的疗效和安全性:GLOW1 试验。
Respir Res. 2011 Dec 7;12(1):156. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-12-156.
9
Relationship between FEV1 change and patient-reported outcomes in randomised trials of inhaled bronchodilators for stable COPD: a systematic review.稳定期 COPD 患者吸入性支气管扩张剂随机试验中 FEV1 变化与患者报告结局的关系:系统评价。
Respir Res. 2011 Apr 8;12(1):40. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-12-40.
10
Outcome measures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): strengths and limitations.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的结局指标:优势和局限性。
Respir Res. 2010 Jun 17;11(1):79. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-11-79.

每日两次格隆溴铵对比安慰剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效和安全性:GEM2研究

Efficacy and Safety of Twice-Daily Glycopyrrolate Versus Placebo in Patients With COPD: The GEM2 Study.

作者信息

Kerwin Edward, Siler Thomas M, Korenblat Phillip, White Alexander, Eckert Joerg H, Henley Michelle, Patalano Francesco, D'Andrea Peter

机构信息

Clinical Research Institute of Southern Oregon, Medford.

Midwest Chest Consultants, St. Charles, Missouri.

出版信息

Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2016 Mar 28;3(2):549-559. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.3.2.2015.0157.

DOI:10.15326/jcopdf.3.2.2015.0157
PMID:28848879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5559157/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Long-acting bronchodilators including muscarinic antagonists are central to the management of patients with COPD. The lycopyrrolate ffect on syptoms and lung function (GEM2) study assessed the efficacy and safety of twice-daily glycopyrrolate 15.6 μg in patients with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation. This 12-week multicenter, double-blind study randomized (1:1) patients to glycopyrrolate 15.6 μg twice daily (b.i.d.) or placebo both delivered via the Neohaler device. The primary objective was superiority of glycopyrrolate compared with placebo for forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV) standardized area under curve (AUC) between 0 and 12 hours post dosing (FEV AUC)at week 12. Other outcomes included additional spirometry parameters, health status using St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), dyspnea via Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI), rescue medication use and COPD symptoms reported by patients via the electronic diary. Safety was also assessed. Of the 432 patients randomized (glycopyrrolate, n=216; placebo, n=216), 96% completed the planned treatment phase. The study met its primary objective (superiority of glycopyrrolate compared with placebo for FEV AUC).Compared with placebo, glycopyrrolate showed significant improvements in lung function parameters (<0.001). Health status (SGRQ total score and COPD assessment test), rescue medication use and daily total COPD symptom scores were significantly improved with glycopyrrolate versus placebo over 12 weeks. Improvements in dyspnea were observed with glycopyrrolate and placebo although the treatment difference was not statistically significant. Overall, differences in the incidences of adverse events and serious adverse events between the groups were not considered clinically meaningful. No deaths were reported. Twice-daily glycopyrrolate 15.6 μg showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements compared with placebo in lung function, COPD symptoms, health status, and rescue medication usage in COPD patients with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01715298.

摘要

未标注

包括毒蕈碱拮抗剂在内的长效支气管扩张剂是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者管理的核心。格隆溴铵对症状和肺功能的影响(GEM2)研究评估了每日两次吸入15.6μg格隆溴铵对中重度气流受限患者的疗效和安全性。这项为期12周的多中心、双盲研究将患者按1:1随机分为每日两次吸入15.6μg格隆溴铵组(bid)或安慰剂组,均通过Neohaler装置给药。主要目标是在第12周时,格隆溴铵组与安慰剂组相比,给药后0至12小时内1秒用力呼气容积(FEV)标准化曲线下面积(AUC)(FEV AUC)具有优越性。其他结局指标包括额外的肺量计参数、使用圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评估的健康状况、通过过渡性呼吸困难指数(TDI)评估的呼吸困难、急救药物使用情况以及患者通过电子日记报告的COPD症状。同时也评估了安全性。在随机分组的432例患者中(格隆溴铵组,n = 216;安慰剂组,n = 216),96%完成了计划的治疗阶段。该研究达到了其主要目标(格隆溴铵组在FEV AUC方面优于安慰剂组)。与安慰剂相比,格隆溴铵在肺功能参数方面有显著改善(<0.001)。在12周内与安慰剂相比,格隆溴铵在健康状况(SGRQ总分和COPD评估测试)、急救药物使用和每日COPD总症状评分方面有显著改善。虽然格隆溴铵和安慰剂在改善呼吸困难方面均有效果,但治疗差异无统计学意义。总体而言,两组之间不良事件和严重不良事件发生率的差异不具有临床意义。未报告死亡病例。对于中重度气流受限的COPD患者,每日两次吸入15.6μg格隆溴铵与安慰剂相比,在肺功能、COPD症状、健康状况和急救药物使用方面显示出具有统计学意义和临床意义的改善。

临床试验注册号

NCT01715298。