Green Jennifer Greif, Keenan Jennifer Kras, Guzmán Javier, Vinnes Suzanne, Holt Melissa, Comer Jonathan S
Boston University, School of Education.
Florida International University, Department of Psychology.
Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2017;2(2):96-110. doi: 10.1080/23794925.2017.1313099. Epub 2017 May 11.
Teachers are a primary source of referral to mental health services for children and adolescents. However, studies find that students identified by teachers differ from those identified by standardized screening scales. This suggests possible discrepancies in conceptualizations of student emotional and behavioral challenges. The current article describes results of a study that explores how teachers conceptualize the emotional and behavioral challenges of adolescents. Middle and high school teachers across the U.S. were identified using a stratified random sampling process and recruited for participation. Twenty-nine teachers (26% of those recruited) were interviewed and asked to describe markers that indicated to them that a student was experiencing emotional and behavioral challenges. Themes in teacher responses were identified and coded. Teachers identified multiple, diverse markers that they perceived were indicators of emotional and behavioral challenges among their students. Markers described by teachers were compared to those typically measured by standardized screening scales. Discrepancies between markers identified by teachers and screening scales are highlighted as potential areas for professional development and enhanced school-based intervention efforts. These findings underscore the importance of integrating teacher perspectives in understanding the referral process for students.
教师是儿童和青少年心理健康服务转介的主要来源。然而,研究发现,教师认定的学生与标准化筛查量表认定的学生有所不同。这表明在对学生情绪和行为挑战的概念化理解上可能存在差异。本文描述了一项研究的结果,该研究探讨了教师如何对青少年的情绪和行为挑战进行概念化理解。通过分层随机抽样过程在美国各地确定了初中和高中教师,并招募他们参与研究。对29名教师(占招募教师的26%)进行了访谈,要求他们描述那些向他们表明学生正在经历情绪和行为挑战的指标。确定并编码了教师回答中的主题。教师们确定了多个不同的指标,他们认为这些指标是学生情绪和行为挑战的指示器。将教师描述的指标与标准化筛查量表通常测量的指标进行了比较。教师确定的指标与筛查量表之间的差异被突出显示为专业发展和加强校本干预努力的潜在领域。这些发现强调了在理解学生转介过程中纳入教师观点的重要性。