• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估认知行为干预对高风险和中风险缓刑犯的效果。

Evaluation of a cognitive-behavioral intervention for high- and medium-risk probationers.

机构信息

Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, USA.

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Behav Sci Law. 2019 Jul;37(4):329-341. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2394. Epub 2019 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1002/bsl.2394
PMID:30775804
Abstract

Reducing recidivism is a central goal of treatment programs for offenders. Preliminary evidence suggests that cognitive-behavioral group interventions based on the National Institute of Corrections curriculum (Bush, Glick, & Taymans, 1997) may be effective in reducing recidivism rates among adult probationers. We evaluated the effectiveness of a program based on this curriculum among 167 high- and medium-risk probationers assigned to this program and a comparison group of 120 high- and medium-risk probationers matched on age and number of prior criminal charges. Improvements over prior studies included use of survival analytic methods and propensity score matching, a longer follow-up interval, and examination of treatment effectiveness within ethnic groups. Relative to the comparison group, treatment group probationers were more likely to complete probation satisfactorily and survive longer before rearrest. Moreover, supplementary analyses suggested that ethnicity was associated with differences in intervention effectiveness. Treatment was predictive of lower recidivism rates among European Americans and African Americans but was less effective among Latino American probationers.

摘要

减少累犯是罪犯治疗计划的核心目标。初步证据表明,基于国家矫正课程(Bush、Glick 和 Taymans,1997)的认知行为小组干预可能对降低成年缓刑犯的累犯率有效。我们评估了在这项课程基础上为 167 名高风险和中风险缓刑犯设立的方案的有效性,并将其与 120 名高风险和中风险缓刑犯进行了比较,这些缓刑犯是根据年龄和前科数量匹配的。与先前的研究相比,本研究的改进之处在于使用了生存分析方法和倾向评分匹配、更长的随访间隔以及在族裔群体内检查治疗效果。与对照组相比,治疗组缓刑犯更有可能满意地完成缓刑期,并在再次被捕前更长时间地生存。此外,补充分析表明,种族与干预效果的差异有关。治疗对欧洲裔美国人和非裔美国人的累犯率降低有预测作用,但对拉丁裔美国人缓刑犯的效果较差。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a cognitive-behavioral intervention for high- and medium-risk probationers.评估认知行为干预对高风险和中风险缓刑犯的效果。
Behav Sci Law. 2019 Jul;37(4):329-341. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2394. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
2
Effectiveness of aggression replacement training in reducing criminal recidivism among convicted adult offenders.攻击性替代训练在减少成年罪犯再犯罪方面的有效性。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2018 Dec;28(6):476-491. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2092. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
3
Type of childhood maltreatment and the risk of criminal recidivism in adult probationers: a cross-sectional study.童年期受虐类型与成年缓刑犯再次犯罪风险:一项横断面研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Aug 19;16:294. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1001-8.
4
Comparing Public Safety Outcomes for Traditional Probation vs Specialty Mental Health Probation.传统缓刑与专业心理健康缓刑的公共安全结果比较。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 1;74(9):942-948. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1384.
5
Stopping the revolving door: effectiveness of mental health court in reducing recidivism by mentally ill offenders.停止旋转门现象:心理健康法庭对减少精神病罪犯再犯罪的有效性。
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Sep 1;65(9):1105-12. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300305.
6
Association between three different cognitive behavioral alcohol treatment programs and recidivism rates among male offenders: findings from the United Kingdom.三种不同的认知行为酒精治疗方案与男性罪犯再犯率之间的关联:来自英国的研究结果。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 Jun;39(6):1100-7. doi: 10.1111/acer.12738. Epub 2015 May 2.
7
Long-Term Effectiveness of a Brief Restorative Justice Intervention.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2019 Jan;63(1):3-17. doi: 10.1177/0306624X18779202. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
8
Effectiveness of the IDAP Treatment Program for Male Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence: A Controlled Study of Criminal Recidivism.IDAP治疗方案对亲密伴侣暴力男性施暴者的有效性:一项关于再次犯罪的对照研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Apr;32(7):1027-1043. doi: 10.1177/0886260515586377. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
9
The relationship between electronic goal reminders and subsequent drug use and treatment initiation in a criminal justice setting.刑事司法环境中电子目标提醒与后续药物使用及治疗启动之间的关系。
Addict Behav. 2015 Dec;51:51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
10
Multisubstance-Using Probationers and the Odds of Arrest While in the Community.多药物使用缓刑犯在社区中被捕的几率。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2020 Jun;64(8):818-839. doi: 10.1177/0306624X19895975. Epub 2019 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Are risk-need-responsivity principles golden? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of community correction programs.风险-需求-反应性原则是万能的吗?对社区矫正项目随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Exp Criminol. 2023 Jan 7:1-24. doi: 10.1007/s11292-022-09550-w.