Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, 1664 N Virginia St, Reno, NV, 89557-0296, USA; Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0559, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, 1664 N Virginia St, Reno, NV, 89557-0296, USA.
Neuroimage. 2019 Jul 15;195:232-242. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.026. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
Ultimately, we aim to generalize and translate scientific knowledge to the real world, yet current understanding of human visual perception is based predominantly on studies of two-dimensional (2-D) images. Recent cognitive-behavioral evidence shows that real objects are processed differently to images, although the neural processes that underlie these differences are unknown. Because real objects (unlike images) afford actions, they may trigger stronger or more prolonged activation in neural populations for visuo-motor action planning. Here, we recorded electroencephalography (EEG) when human observers viewed real-world three-dimensional (3-D) objects or closely matched 2-D images of the same items. Although responses to real objects and images were similar overall, there were critical differences. Compared to images, viewing real objects triggered stronger and more sustained event-related desynchronization (ERD) in the μ frequency band (8-13 Hz) - a neural signature of automatic motor preparation. Event-related potentials (ERPs) revealed a transient, early occipital negativity for real objects (versus images), likely reflecting 3-D stereoscopic differences, and a late sustained parietal amplitude modulation consistent with an 'old-new' memory advantage for real objects over images. Together, these findings demonstrate that real-world objects trigger stronger and more sustained action-related brain responses than images do. The results highlight important similarities and differences between brain responses to images and richer, more ecologically relevant, real-world objects.
最终,我们的目标是将科学知识推广和转化到现实世界中,但目前对人类视觉感知的理解主要基于对二维(2-D)图像的研究。最近的认知行为证据表明,真实物体的处理方式与图像不同,尽管这些差异背后的神经过程尚不清楚。因为真实物体(与图像不同)可以进行操作,所以它们可能会引发更强或更持久的神经群体活动,用于视动动作规划。在这里,当人类观察者观看真实的三维(3-D)物体或相同物品的紧密匹配的 2-D 图像时,我们记录了脑电图(EEG)。尽管真实物体和图像的反应总体上相似,但也存在关键差异。与图像相比,观看真实物体在μ频带(8-13Hz)中引发更强和更持续的事件相关去同步(ERD)-这是自动运动准备的神经特征。事件相关电位(ERPs)揭示了真实物体(与图像相比)的早期枕部负性,可能反映了 3-D 立体差异,以及与真实物体相比,图像具有更强的后期持续顶叶幅度调制,这与真实物体的“新旧”记忆优势一致。总的来说,这些发现表明,真实世界的物体比图像引发更强和更持续的与动作相关的大脑反应。这些结果强调了图像和更丰富、更具生态相关性的真实世界物体的大脑反应之间的重要相似性和差异。