• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

难以应对?具有相似可操作性的干扰物会对被处理物体的目标选择产生干扰。

Too much to handle? Interference from distractors with similar affordances on target selection for handled objects.

机构信息

CNRS, UMR 9193 -SCALab-Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives, Univ. Lille, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Aug 29;18(8):e0290226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290226. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0290226
PMID:37643170
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10464981/
Abstract

The existence of handle affordances has been classically demonstrated using the Stimulus-Response Compatibility paradigm, with shorter response times when the orientation of the object handle and the response hand are compatible in comparison to incompatible. Yet the activation of handle affordances from visual objects has been investigated in very simple situations involving single stimulus and motor response. As natural perceptual scenes are usually composed of multiple objects that could activate multiple affordances, the consequence of multiple affordance activation on the perception and processing of a given object of the scene requires more investigation. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of distractor affordances on the processing of a target object in situations involving several familiar graspable objects. In two online experiments, 229 participants had to select a target object (the kitchen utensil or the tool) in a visual scene displaying a pair of objects. They performed left key presses when the target was on the left and right key presses when the target was on the right. Target handle orientation and response side could be compatible or incompatible. Critically, target and distractor objects had similar or dissimilar handle affordances, with handles oriented for left- or right-hand grasps. Results from the two experiments showed slower response times when target and distractor objects had similar handle affordances in comparison to dissimilar affordances, when participants performed right hand responses and when target orientation and response were compatible. Thus, affordance similarity between objects may interfere rather than facilitate object processing and slow down target selection. These findings are in line with models of affordance and object selection assuming automatic inhibition of distractors' affordances for appropriate object interaction.

摘要

手柄启发式的存在已经通过刺激-反应相容性范式得到了经典的证明,与不兼容的情况相比,当物体手柄的方向与反应手的方向相匹配时,反应时间会更短。然而,从视觉对象中激活手柄启发式已经在非常简单的情况下进行了研究,涉及单个刺激和运动反应。由于自然感知场景通常由多个物体组成,这些物体可以激活多个启发式,因此需要更多的研究来确定多个启发式激活对场景中给定物体的感知和处理的影响。本研究的目的是确定在涉及多个可抓握熟悉物体的情况下,分心手柄启发式对目标物体处理的影响。在两个在线实验中,229 名参与者必须在显示一对物体的视觉场景中选择一个目标物体(厨房用具或工具)。当目标在左侧时,他们按下左键,当目标在右侧时,他们按下右键。目标手柄方向和反应侧可以兼容或不兼容。关键的是,目标和分心物体具有相似或不同的手柄启发式,手柄方向适合左手或右手抓握。来自两个实验的结果表明,当目标和分心物体具有相似的手柄启发式(相对于不同的启发式)时,当参与者执行右手反应且目标方向和反应兼容时,反应时间会变慢。因此,物体之间的启发式相似性可能会干扰而不是促进物体处理并减慢目标选择。这些发现与假设对适当物体交互自动抑制分心物体启发式的启发式和物体选择模型一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7044/10464981/b20e4614e001/pone.0290226.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7044/10464981/975c0aa3ac61/pone.0290226.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7044/10464981/331533690033/pone.0290226.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7044/10464981/ef5d59560682/pone.0290226.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7044/10464981/4aaeaa3acca1/pone.0290226.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7044/10464981/1bc67f5b578c/pone.0290226.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7044/10464981/f94f7a20c93e/pone.0290226.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7044/10464981/801e2c575a17/pone.0290226.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7044/10464981/b20e4614e001/pone.0290226.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7044/10464981/975c0aa3ac61/pone.0290226.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7044/10464981/331533690033/pone.0290226.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7044/10464981/ef5d59560682/pone.0290226.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7044/10464981/4aaeaa3acca1/pone.0290226.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7044/10464981/1bc67f5b578c/pone.0290226.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7044/10464981/f94f7a20c93e/pone.0290226.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7044/10464981/801e2c575a17/pone.0290226.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7044/10464981/b20e4614e001/pone.0290226.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Too much to handle? Interference from distractors with similar affordances on target selection for handled objects.难以应对?具有相似可操作性的干扰物会对被处理物体的目标选择产生干扰。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 29;18(8):e0290226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290226. eCollection 2023.
2
Interference from multiple affordances when selecting everyday graspable objects: Thematic relations solve it.选择日常可抓握物体时多种可供性的干扰:主题关系可解决此问题。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2024 Aug;50(8):875-891. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001215. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
3
Is there a lower visual field advantage for object affordances? A registered report.物体功能是否具有较低的视野优势?一项已注册的报告。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Nov;77(11):2151-2164. doi: 10.1177/17470218241230812. Epub 2024 Feb 18.
4
Sidestepping spatial confounds in object-based correspondence effects: The Bimanual Affordance Task (BMAT).规避基于物体的对应效应中的空间混淆因素:双手可供性任务(BMAT)。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Nov;72(11):2605-2613. doi: 10.1177/1747021819852216. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and affordance effects are not ruled by the same mechanisms.空间刺激-反应兼容性和可供性效应并非由相同机制所支配。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 May 18;9:283. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00283. eCollection 2015.
6
Object Affordances Potentiate Responses but Do Not Guide Attentional Prioritization.物体可供性增强反应,但不引导注意优先级。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2016 Jan 12;9:74. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2015.00074. eCollection 2015.
7
Do already grasped objects activate motor affordances?已抓住的物体是否激活运动功能?
Psychol Res. 2019 Oct;83(7):1363-1374. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1004-9. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
8
The prominent role of perceptual salience in object discrimination: overt discrimination of graspable side does not activate grasping affordances.知觉显著性在物体辨别中的突出作用:可抓握侧的显性辨别并不激活抓握功能。
Psychol Res. 2021 Apr;85(3):1234-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01296-2. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
9
The role of perceptual load in action affordance by ignored objects.被忽视物体的动作可供性中知觉负载的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):1122-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0299-6.
10
Dissociating between object affordances and spatial compatibility effects using early response components.使用早期反应成分区分物体提供的作用和空间兼容性效应。
Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 4;4:591. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00591. eCollection 2013.

本文引用的文献

1
Congruent action context releases Mu rhythm desynchronization when visual objects activate competing action representations.当视觉对象激活相互竞争的动作表征时,一致的动作情境会释放缪节律去同步化。
Cortex. 2023 Apr;161:65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.01.009. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
2
Influence of colour on object motor representation.颜色对物体运动表象的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Jan 7;164:108103. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108103. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
3
Negative affordance effect: automatic response inhibition triggered by handle orientation of non-target object.
否定性可供效果:非目标物体把手方向引发的自动反应抑制。
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):1737-1750. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01600-8. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
4
Graspability Modulates the Stronger Neural Signature of Motor Preparation for Real Objects vs. Pictures.可触及性调节了真实物体与图片的运动准备更强的神经特征。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Nov 5;33(12):2477-2493. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01771.
5
Automatic inhibition of habitual response associated with a non-target object while performing goal-directed actions.在执行目标导向动作时,自动抑制与非目标对象相关的习惯性反应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Apr;74(4):716-732. doi: 10.1177/1747021820971921. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
6
Motor representations evoked by objects under varying action intentions.在不同动作意图下由物体诱发的运动表征。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Jan;47(1):53-80. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000876. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
7
Size coding of alternative responses is sufficient to induce a potentiation effect with manipulable objects.对替代反应进行大小编码足以引起可操作物体的增效作用。
Cognition. 2020 Dec;205:104377. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104377. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
8
Action inhibition and affordances associated with a non-target object: An integrative review.与非目标物体相关的动作抑制和可供性:综合评述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 May;112:487-502. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.02.029. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
9
Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial.混合效应模型中的功效分析与效应量:教程
J Cogn. 2018 Jan 12;1(1):9. doi: 10.5334/joc.10.
10
Tool and object affordances: An ecological eye-tracking study.工具和物体可供性:一项生态眼动追踪研究。
Brain Cogn. 2019 Oct;135:103582. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.103582. Epub 2019 Jun 27.