• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对有自残行为的青少年,特定心理治疗与常规治疗的治疗参与度:系统评价与荟萃分析

Treatment Engagement in Specific Psychological Treatment vs. Treatment as Usual for Adolescents With Self-Harm: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Yuan Sze Ngar Vanessa, Kwok Ka Ho Robin, Ougrin Dennis

机构信息

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 4;10:104. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00104. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00104
PMID:30778310
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6369209/
Abstract

Self-harm is a major public health problem. It is one of the best predictors of suicide in adolescents. Despite recent advances in the understanding of self-harm, poor treatment engagement remains a significant clinical obstacle. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to update and extend previous research investigating treatment engagement with specific psychological treatments (SPT) vs. treatment as usual (TAU) in adolescents who self-harm. Data sources were identified by searching the Medline, PsychINFO, EMBASE, and PubMed databases as of October 2017. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comparing SPT and TAU in adolescents (through age 18 years) with self-harm were included. The results show that 12 RCTs investigating 1,255 young people were included in the meta-analysis. The proportion of adolescents not completing four or more sessions in SPT was significantly lower (28.4%, 179/630) than TAU (45.9%, 287/625), RR = 0.64 (95% CI:0.51 -0.79), < 0.0001. There were significantly more adolescents engaged with SPT than TAU. Specific psychological treatments should be offered to adolescents with self-harm to maximize treatment engagement. Engaging adolescents with psychological treatment is necessary although not sufficient to achieve treatment goals.

摘要

自我伤害是一个重大的公共卫生问题。它是青少年自杀的最佳预测指标之一。尽管最近在对自我伤害的理解方面取得了进展,但治疗参与度低仍然是一个重大的临床障碍。本荟萃分析的目的是更新和扩展先前的研究,该研究调查了在自我伤害的青少年中,特定心理治疗(SPT)与常规治疗(TAU)的治疗参与度。通过检索截至2017年10月的Medline、PsychINFO、EMBASE和PubMed数据库来确定数据来源。纳入了比较自我伤害青少年(18岁及以下)的SPT和TAU的随机对照试验(RCT)。结果显示,荟萃分析纳入了12项调查1255名年轻人的RCT。在SPT中未完成四次或更多疗程的青少年比例(28.4%,179/630)显著低于TAU(45.9%,287/625),RR = 0.64(95% CI:0.51 - 0.79),P < 0.0001。参与SPT的青少年明显多于TAU。应向自我伤害的青少年提供特定心理治疗,以最大限度地提高治疗参与度。让青少年参与心理治疗是必要的,尽管这不足以实现治疗目标。

相似文献

1
Treatment Engagement in Specific Psychological Treatment vs. Treatment as Usual for Adolescents With Self-Harm: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.针对有自残行为的青少年,特定心理治疗与常规治疗的治疗参与度:系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 4;10:104. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00104. eCollection 2019.
2
Specific psychological treatment versus treatment as usual in adolescents with self-harm: systematic review and meta-analysis.特定心理治疗与常规治疗在青少年自伤中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crisis. 2011;32(2):74-80. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000060.
3
Therapeutic interventions for suicide attempts and self-harm in adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis.青少年自杀未遂和自伤的治疗干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;54(2):97-107.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Oct 25.
4
Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder.针对边缘型人格障碍患者的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 4;5(5):CD012955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012955.pub2.
5
Practitioner review: Self-harm in adolescents.从业者综述:青少年自伤。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;53(4):337-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02525.x.
6
Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of Psychotherapies for Self-harm and Suicidal Behavior Among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.儿童和青少年自我伤害及自杀行为心理治疗的比较疗效与可接受性:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e216614. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6614.
7
8
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
9
Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents.用于治疗儿童和青少年慢性复发性疼痛的心理疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 29;9(9):CD003968. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003968.pub5.
10
Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults.成人自伤的心理社会干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 22;4(4):CD013668. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013668.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of childhood adversity and mental health admission patterns to predict suicide in young people.利用童年逆境和心理健康入院模式预测年轻人自杀情况。
BJPsych Open. 2025 Jun 20;11(4):e123. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2025.787.
2
Mortality in adolescents after therapeutic intervention for self-harm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.青少年自残治疗干预后的死亡率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
JCPP Adv. 2025 Jan 23. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12302.
3
Practitioner Review: Treatments for young people who self-harm - challenges and recommendations for research and clinical practice.

本文引用的文献

1
Innovations in Practice: pilot evaluation of the supported discharge service (SDS): clinical outcomes and service use.实践中的创新:支持性出院服务(SDS)的试点评估:临床结果与服务利用情况
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2014 Nov;19(4):265-269. doi: 10.1111/camh.12038. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
2
Review: Alternatives to inpatient care for children and adolescents with mental health disorders.综述:针对患有精神疾病的儿童和青少年的住院治疗替代方案。
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2016 Feb;21(1):3-10. doi: 10.1111/camh.12123. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
3
Comparison of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an intensive community supported discharge service versus treatment as usual for adolescents with psychiatric emergencies: a randomised controlled trial.
从业者评论:针对青少年自伤行为的治疗——研究与临床实践面临的挑战及建议
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;66(1):122-131. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.14052. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
4
Religion would be a missing link in the case formulation of adolescents with conduct problems: an eclectic approach.宗教在品行问题青少年的案例分析中可能是一个缺失环节:一种折衷方法。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 22;15:1348799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1348799. eCollection 2024.
5
Psychosocial interventions for suicidal and self-injurious-related behaviors among adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Chinese practices.中文译文: 青少年自杀和自伤相关行为的心理社会干预:中国实践的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 18;11:1281696. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1281696. eCollection 2023.
6
Learning with fun: the 2nd residential course on child and adolescent psychiatry in Catania, Sicily, endorsed by the ESCAP Research Academy.寓教于乐:第二届儿童与青少年精神病学住校课程,于西西里岛卡塔尼亚举办,由亚太儿童青少年精神医学与相关专业学会研究学院认可。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Apr;32(4):725-727. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02162-3.
7
Effectiveness of distance-based suicide interventions: multi-level meta-analysis and systematic review.基于距离的自杀干预措施的有效性:多层次荟萃分析与系统评价
BJPsych Open. 2022 Jul 21;8(4):e140. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.526.
8
[Psychotherapy after a suicide attempt-current evidence and evaluation].自杀未遂后的心理治疗——当前证据与评估
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Jan;65(1):40-46. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03466-y. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
9
The Prevalence, Correlates and Functions of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury in Vietnamese Adolescents.越南青少年非自杀性自伤行为的患病率、相关因素及功能
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Nov 27;14:1915-1927. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S339168. eCollection 2021.
10
Predictors of Treatment Engagement Among Suicidal Youth Experiencing Homelessness.预测有流浪经历的自杀青少年的治疗参与度的因素。
Community Ment Health J. 2021 Oct;57(7):1310-1317. doi: 10.1007/s10597-021-00850-5. Epub 2021 May 29.
强化社区支持出院服务与常规治疗对青少年精神科急诊患者的有效性及成本效益比较:一项随机对照试验
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;5(6):477-485. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30129-9. Epub 2018 May 3.
4
Cognitive-Behavioral Family Treatment for Suicide Attempt Prevention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.认知行为家庭治疗预防自杀未遂:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;56(6):506-514. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
5
Psychosocial interventions for self-harm, suicidal ideation and suicide attempt in children and young people: What? How? Who? and Where?儿童和青少年自伤、自杀意念和自杀未遂的心理社会干预:什么?如何?谁?在哪里?
Evid Based Ment Health. 2017 May;20(2):35-40. doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102667. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
6
Family-Based Crisis Intervention With Suicidal Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial.针对有自杀倾向青少年的家庭危机干预:一项随机临床试验。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Mar;35(3):170-175. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001076.
7
Cognitive behavioural therapy and short-term psychoanalytical psychotherapy versus a brief psychosocial intervention in adolescents with unipolar major depressive disorder (IMPACT): a multicentre, pragmatic, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial.认知行为疗法和短期精神分析心理治疗与针对单相重度抑郁症青少年的简短心理社会干预的对比研究(IMPACT):一项多中心、实用性、观察者盲法、随机对照优势试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;4(2):109-119. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30378-9. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
8
Dialectical Behavior Therapy Compared With Enhanced Usual Care for Adolescents With Repeated Suicidal and Self-Harming Behavior: Outcomes Over a One-Year Follow-Up.辩证行为疗法对比增强常规护理治疗青少年重复自杀和自残行为:一年随访期的结果。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;55(4):295-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
9
Is supervision necessary? Examining the effects of internet-based CBT training with and without supervision.监督是否必要?考察有无监督的基于互联网的认知行为疗法训练的效果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Mar;84(3):191-9. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000079. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
10
A systematic review of psychosocial suicide prevention interventions for youth.青少年心理社会自杀预防干预措施的系统评价。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 May;25(5):467-82. doi: 10.1007/s00787-015-0783-4. Epub 2015 Oct 15.