Kartal Abdulcabbar, Aydın Hüseyin Onur, Oduncu Mehmet, Ferhatoğlu Murat Ferhat, Kıvılcım Taner, Filiz Ali İlker
Department of General Surgery, Okan University Medicine Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of General Surgery, Başkent University Medicine Faculty, Ankara, Turkey.
Prague Med Rep. 2018;119(4):148-155. doi: 10.14712/23362936.2019.2.
Our study aims to compare the surgical outcome of Limberg transposition flap, Karydakis flap, and primary closure after excision to treat sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease. A total of 634 patients with pilonidal sinus who underwent surgery were evaluated retrospectively from January 2014 to January 2016. The patients were divided into three groups. Limberg transposition flap (LTF) was performed in 131 patients (group 1), Karydakis flap (KF) was performed in 232 patients (group 2) and primary closure (PC) after excision was performed in 271 patients (group 3). Patient demographics, operative and postoperative outcomes were recorded and analyzed retrospectively. The mean age (p=0.98), sex ratio (p=0.74) and removed sinus volume (p=0.67) were not statistically different between groups. Mean operative time was 54.3 ± 6.4 min for group 1, 46.8 ± 10.5 min for group 2, and 26.9 ± 5.8 min for group 3 respectively (p=0.01). When the length of hospital stay was compared, there was a significant difference in favor of primary closure (p=0.01). Regarding early surgical complication, Karydakis flap technique was superior to other groups (p<0.001). The recurrent rate was higher in the primary closure group (p<0.001). In our study, the primary closure method regarding the duration of surgery and hospitalization; Karydakis method regarding postoperative complications (seroma, hematoma, wound dissociation, infection, recurrence) were superior to the other two methods.
我们的研究旨在比较Limberg转移皮瓣、Karydakis皮瓣以及切除术后一期缝合治疗骶尾部藏毛窦疾病的手术效果。对2014年1月至2016年1月期间共634例行手术治疗的藏毛窦患者进行回顾性评估。患者被分为三组。131例患者接受Limberg转移皮瓣(LTF)手术(第1组),232例患者接受Karydakis皮瓣(KF)手术(第2组),271例患者接受切除术后一期缝合(PC)(第3组)。回顾性记录并分析患者的人口统计学资料、手术及术后结果。各组间的平均年龄(p = 0.98)、性别比(p = 0.74)和切除窦体积(p = 0.67)无统计学差异。第1组平均手术时间为54.3±6.4分钟,第2组为46.8±10.5分钟,第3组为26.9±5.8分钟(p = 0.01)。比较住院时间时,一期缝合组具有显著优势(p = 0.01)。关于早期手术并发症,Karydakis皮瓣技术优于其他组(p<0.001)。一期缝合组的复发率较高(p<0.001)。在我们的研究中,一期缝合方法在手术时间和住院时间方面;Karydakis方法在术后并发症(血清肿、血肿、伤口裂开、感染、复发)方面优于其他两种方法。