Precision Health Economics, Oakland, California.
Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Am J Perinatol. 2020 Mar;37(4):398-408. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1679916. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
The burden of preeclampsia severity on the health of mothers and infants during the first year after delivery is unclear, given the lack of population-based longitudinal studies in the United States.
We assessed maternal and infant adverse outcomes during the first year after delivery using population-based hospital discharge information merged with vital statistics and birth certificates of 2,021,013 linked maternal-infant births in California. We calculated sampling weights using the National Center for Health Statistics data to adjust for observed differences in maternal characteristics between California and the rest of the United States. Separately, we estimated the association between preeclampsia and gestational age and examined collider bias in models of preeclampsia and maternal and infant adverse outcomes.
Compared with women without preeclampsia, women with mild and severe preeclampsia delivered 0.66 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64, 0.68) and 2.74 weeks (95% CI: 2.72, 2.77) earlier, respectively. Mild preeclampsia was associated with an increased risk of having any maternal adverse outcome (relative risk [RR] = 1.95; 95% CI: 1.93, 1.97), as was severe preeclampsia (RR = 2.80; 95% CI: 2.78, 2.82). The risk of an infant adverse outcome was increased for severe preeclampsia (RR = 2.15; 95% CI: 2.14, 2.17) but only marginally for mild preeclampsia (RR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.98, 1). Collider bias produced an inverse association for mild preeclampsia and attenuated the association for severe preeclampsia in models for any infant adverse outcome.
Using multiple datasets, we estimated that severe preeclampsia is associated with a higher risk of maternal and infant adverse outcomes compared with mild preeclampsia, including an earlier preterm delivery.
鉴于美国缺乏基于人群的纵向研究,子痫前期严重程度对产妇和婴儿在分娩后第一年健康状况的影响尚不清楚。
我们使用基于人群的医院出院信息,结合加利福尼亚州 2021013 例母婴链接分娩的人口统计和出生证明,评估了分娩后第一年母婴不良结局。我们使用国家卫生统计中心的数据计算了抽样权重,以调整加利福尼亚州和美国其他地区产妇特征的观察差异。此外,我们分别估计了子痫前期与胎龄的关系,并检查了子痫前期和母婴不良结局模型中的混杂偏倚。
与无子痫前期的妇女相比,轻度和重度子痫前期的妇女分别提前 0.66 周(95%置信区间[CI]:0.64,0.68)和 2.74 周(95%CI:2.72,2.77)分娩。轻度子痫前期与任何母婴不良结局的风险增加相关(相对风险[RR] = 1.95;95%CI:1.93,1.97),重度子痫前期也如此(RR = 2.80;95%CI:2.78,2.82)。严重子痫前期的婴儿不良结局风险增加(RR = 2.15;95%CI:2.14,2.17),但轻度子痫前期的风险仅略有增加(RR = 0.99;95%CI:0.98,1.00)。混杂偏倚导致轻度子痫前期的关联呈反向,在婴儿任何不良结局的模型中减弱了重度子痫前期的关联。
使用多个数据集,我们估计与轻度子痫前期相比,重度子痫前期与母婴不良结局的风险更高,包括更早的早产。