Husson C, Delatour C, Frey P, Marçais B, Saurat C, Schenck N
INRA, Nancy-Universités, UMR1136 Interactions Arbres-Microorganismes, Champenoux, France.
LNPV-UMAF, Malzéville, France.
Plant Dis. 2007 Oct;91(10):1359. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-91-10-1359B.
In April 2002, Phytophthora ramorum was associated with twig blight and brown spots on Rhododendron spp. leaves from a nursery in France. The isolate was identified by its morphological characters on V8 agar: slow growth, deciduous and semipapillate sporangia, and abundant production of large chlamydospores (3). The identification was confirmed by ITS rDNA sequencing. During 2002, P. ramorum was also isolated from diseased Viburnum tinus and V. × bodnantense plants exhibiting symptoms of wilting and stem base discoloration. Subsequently, repeated surveys for P. ramorum were carried out in nurseries and areas surrounding nurseries throughout France. Since 2004, a large range of known hosts were investigated in approximately 2,000 nurseries and 200 other sites each year. P. ramorum was detected exclusively in nurseries at 29 locations in 2002, 9 in 2003, 23 in 2004, 17 in 2005, and 19 in 2006. Rhododendron spp. and occasionally V. tinus were the major hosts. In addition, the pathogen was detected for the first time on Pieris japonica in two nurseries in 2005 and on Camellia sp. in one nursery in 2006 from plants exhibiting leaf and twig blight. In both cases, P. ramorum had already been detected on Rhododendron spp. in the same nurseries. Most of the infected plants were found in northwestern France (Bretagne and Pays-de-la-Loire), or came from this region, which is the main rhododendron-growing area in France. In some cases, plants were imported from Belgium or the Netherlands. P. ramorum was also detected in a nursery in soil close to diseased Rhododendron spp. plants and pond water used for irrigation by using a combination of baiting with Rhododendron spp. leaves and PCR assay with species-specific primers (1). Overall, approximately 1% of the investigated nurseries were found positive each year, and this ratio was quite stable from 2004 to 2006. To date, P. ramorum has not been detected outside of nurseries, although many surveys were conducted on the west coast of France where the risk is considered to be high because of a favorable mild and humid climate and the presence of suitable hosts. In addition, 78 isolates of P. ramorum collected between 2002 and 2004 on Rhododendron spp. and V. tinus were found to be of A1 mating type based on pairings with P. cryptogea A1 and A2 mating types (2). References: (1) K. J. Hayden et al. Phytopathology 94:1075, 2004. (2) S. Werres and B. Zielke J. Plant Dis. Prot. 110:129, 2003. (3) S. Werres et al. Mycol. Res. 105:1155, 2001.
2002年4月,在法国一家苗圃的杜鹃属植物叶片上,发现了与枝枯病和褐色斑点有关的樟疫霉。通过在V8琼脂培养基上观察其形态特征对该分离株进行鉴定:生长缓慢,游动孢子囊脱落且半乳头状,大量产生大型厚垣孢子(3)。通过ITS rDNA测序确认了鉴定结果。2002年期间,还从表现出萎蔫和茎基部变色症状的患病荚蒾和杂交荚蒾植株中分离出了樟疫霉。随后,在法国各地的苗圃以及苗圃周边地区对樟疫霉进行了反复调查。自2004年以来,每年在约2000家苗圃和200个其他地点对大量已知寄主进行调查。2002年,仅在29个地点的苗圃中检测到樟疫霉,2003年有9个,2004年有23个,2005年有17个,2006年有19个。杜鹃属植物以及偶尔的荚蒾是主要寄主。此外,2005年在两家苗圃的日本马醉木上首次检测到该病原菌,2006年在一家苗圃的山茶属植物上检测到该病原菌,这些植物均表现出叶和枝枯病症状。在这两种情况下,在同一苗圃的杜鹃属植物上已检测到樟疫霉。大多数受感染的植物发现于法国西北部(布列塔尼和卢瓦尔河地区),或者来自该地区,该地区是法国主要的杜鹃花种植区。在某些情况下,植物是从比利时或荷兰进口的。通过将杜鹃属植物叶片诱饵法与物种特异性引物PCR检测相结合,在靠近患病杜鹃属植物的苗圃土壤以及用于灌溉的池塘水中也检测到了樟疫霉(1)。总体而言,每年约1%的被调查苗圃呈阳性,并且该比例在2004年至2006年期间相当稳定。迄今为止,尽管在法国西海岸进行了许多调查,由于该地区气候温和湿润且有合适的寄主,被认为风险很高,但在苗圃之外尚未检测到樟疫霉。此外,根据与隐地疫霉A1和A2交配型的配对结果,发现2002年至2004年期间在杜鹃属植物和荚蒾上收集的78株樟疫霉分离株为A1交配型(2)。参考文献:(1)K. J. 海登等人,《植物病理学》94:1075,2004年。(2)S. 韦雷斯和B. 齐尔克,《植物病害防治杂志》110:129,2003年。(3)S. 韦雷斯等人,《真菌学研究》105:1155,2001年。