• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

森林再生在全球碳汇动态中的作用。

Role of forest regrowth in global carbon sink dynamics.

机构信息

School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, United Kingdom;

Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 5;116(10):4382-4387. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810512116. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1810512116
PMID:30782807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6410874/
Abstract

Although the existence of a large carbon sink in terrestrial ecosystems is well-established, the drivers of this sink remain uncertain. It has been suggested that perturbations to forest demography caused by past land-use change, management, and natural disturbances may be causing a large component of current carbon uptake. Here we use a global compilation of forest age observations, combined with a terrestrial biosphere model with explicit modeling of forest regrowth, to partition the global forest carbon sink between old-growth and regrowth stands over the period 1981-2010. For 2001-2010 we find a carbon sink of 0.85 (0.66-0.96) Pg year located in intact old-growth forest, primarily in the moist tropics and boreal Siberia, and 1.30 (1.03-1.96) Pg year located in stands regrowing after past disturbance. Approaching half of the sink in regrowth stands would have occurred from demographic changes alone, in the absence of other environmental changes. These age-constrained results show consistency with those simulated using an ensemble of demographically-enabled terrestrial biosphere models following an independent reconstruction of historical land use and management. We estimate that forests will accumulate an additional 69 (44-131) Pg C in live biomass from changes in demography alone if natural disturbances, wood harvest, and reforestation continue at rates comparable to those during 1981-2010. Our results confirm that it is not possible to understand the current global terrestrial carbon sink without accounting for the sizeable sink due to forest demography. They also imply that a large portion of the current terrestrial carbon sink is strictly transient in nature.

摘要

尽管陆地生态系统中存在大型碳汇这一事实已得到充分证实,但碳汇的驱动因素仍不确定。有人认为,过去土地利用变化、管理和自然干扰对森林动态的影响可能导致了当前碳吸收的很大一部分。在这里,我们利用全球森林年龄观测资料的汇编,结合具有明确森林再生建模功能的陆地生物圈模型,将 1981-2010 年期间全球森林碳汇分为成熟林和再生林两个部分。对于 2001-2010 年,我们发现,在完整的成熟林中存在一个 0.85(0.66-0.96)Pg 年的碳汇,主要位于湿润热带地区和西伯利亚北部地区,以及 1.30(1.03-1.96)Pg 年的碳汇位于过去干扰后再生的林分中。再生林中近一半的碳汇仅由于人口变化而产生,如果没有其他环境变化,这种情况就会发生。这些受年龄限制的结果与使用受人口统计数据驱动的陆地生物圈模型集合模拟的结果一致,这些模型是根据历史土地利用和管理的独立重建进行的。我们估计,如果自然干扰、木材采伐和重新造林的速度与 1981-2010 年期间的速度相当,那么仅通过人口统计数据的变化,森林将在活生物质中额外积累 69(44-131)Pg C。我们的研究结果证实,如果不考虑森林动态引起的大量碳汇,就不可能理解当前的全球陆地碳汇。这也意味着当前陆地碳汇的很大一部分在本质上是严格暂时的。

相似文献

1
Role of forest regrowth in global carbon sink dynamics.森林再生在全球碳汇动态中的作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 5;116(10):4382-4387. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810512116. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
2
The enduring world forest carbon sink.持久的世界森林碳汇。
Nature. 2024 Jul;631(8021):563-569. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07602-x. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
3
A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests.世界森林是一个巨大而持久的碳汇。
Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):988-93. doi: 10.1126/science.1201609. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
4
Nutrient limitation in tropical secondary forests following different management practices.不同管理措施下热带次生林的养分限制
Ecol Appl. 2017 Apr;27(3):734-755. doi: 10.1002/eap.1478. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
5
Global-scale impacts of nitrogen deposition on tree carbon sequestration in tropical, temperate, and boreal forests: A meta-analysis.全球范围内氮沉降对热带、温带和北方森林树木碳固存的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Feb;24(2):e416-e431. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13862. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
6
Spatio-temporal changes in biomass carbon sinks in China's forests from 1977 to 2008.1977 年至 2008 年中国森林生物量碳汇的时空变化。
Sci China Life Sci. 2013 Jul;56(7):661-71. doi: 10.1007/s11427-013-4492-2. Epub 2013 May 31.
7
Forest biomass carbon sinks in East Asia, with special reference to the relative contributions of forest expansion and forest growth.东亚的森林生物量碳汇,特别提及森林扩张和森林生长的相对贡献。
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Jun;20(6):2019-30. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12512. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
8
Asynchronous carbon sink saturation in African and Amazonian tropical forests.非洲和亚马逊热带森林的碳汇非同步饱和。
Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7797):80-87. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2035-0. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
9
Forest disturbances and climate constrain carbon allocation dynamics in trees.森林干扰和气候限制了树木中碳分配动态。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Jul;28(14):4342-4358. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16172. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
10
Carbon benefits from Forest Transitions promoting biomass expansions and thickening.森林转型促进生物质扩张和增厚,有利于碳汇。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Oct;26(10):5365-5370. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15292. Epub 2020 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Newly established forests dominated global carbon sequestration change induced by land cover conversions.新建立的森林主导了由土地覆盖转变引起的全球碳固存变化。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 17;16(1):6570. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61956-y.
2
Global variation in vegetation carbon use efficiency inferred from eddy covariance observations.基于涡度相关观测推断的全球植被碳利用效率变化
Nat Ecol Evol. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1038/s41559-025-02753-0.
3
Soils and topography drive large and predictable shifts in canopy dynamics across tropical forest landscapes.土壤和地形驱动着热带森林景观中林冠动态的大规模且可预测的变化。
New Phytol. 2025 Aug;247(4):1666-1679. doi: 10.1111/nph.70300. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
4
Current Forest Carbon Offset Buffer Pool Contributions Do Not Adequately Insure Against Disturbance-Driven Carbon Losses.当前森林碳抵消缓冲池的贡献不足以确保抵御干扰驱动的碳损失。
Glob Chang Biol. 2025 Jun;31(6):e70251. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70251.
5
Large live biomass carbon losses from droughts in the northern temperate ecosystems during 2016-2022.2016年至2022年期间,北温带生态系统因干旱导致大量活生物量碳损失。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jun 2;16(1):4980. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59999-2.
6
Nature's Master of Ceremony: The Circadian Clock as Orchestratot of Tree Growth and Phenology.大自然的司仪:生物钟作为树木生长和物候的 orchestratot(疑有误,可能是orchestrator“协调者”)
NPJ Biol Timing Sleep. 2025;2(1):16. doi: 10.1038/s44323-025-00034-4. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
7
Hedging our bet on forest permanence for the economic viability of climate targets.为气候目标的经济可行性而在森林持久性上押宝。
Nat Commun. 2025 Mar 27;16(1):2460. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57607-x.
8
Vertical canopy gradients of respiration drive plant carbon budgets and leaf area index.呼吸作用的垂直冠层梯度驱动着植物的碳收支和叶面积指数。
New Phytol. 2025 Apr;246(1):144-157. doi: 10.1111/nph.20423. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
9
A long-term analysis, modeling and drivers of forest recovery in Central Mexico.墨西哥中部森林恢复的长期分析、建模及驱动因素
Environ Monit Assess. 2024 Dec 21;197(1):87. doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-13584-0.
10
Contributions of ecological restoration policies to China's land carbon balance.生态恢复政策对中国陆地碳平衡的贡献。
Nat Commun. 2024 Nov 9;15(1):9708. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54100-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Widespread seasonal compensation effects of spring warming on northern plant productivity.春季变暖对北方植物生产力的广泛季节性补偿效应。
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7725):110-114. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0555-7. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
2
Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss.根据对热带森林地上生物量增加和减少的测量,热带森林是一个碳汇。
Science. 2017 Oct 13;358(6360):230-234. doi: 10.1126/science.aam5962. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
3
A global view of shifting cultivation: Recent, current, and future extent.刀耕火种的全球视野:过去、现在及未来的范围
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 8;12(9):e0184479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184479. eCollection 2017.
4
A matter of tree longevity.树木寿命的问题。
Science. 2017 Jan 13;355(6321):130-131. doi: 10.1126/science.aal2449.
5
Carbon sequestration potential of second-growth forest regeneration in the Latin American tropics.拉丁美洲热带地区次生林更新的碳固存潜力。
Sci Adv. 2016 May 13;2(5):e1501639. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501639. eCollection 2016 May.
6
Europe's forest management did not mitigate climate warming.欧洲的森林管理并没有缓解气候变暖。
Science. 2016 Feb 5;351(6273):597-600. doi: 10.1126/science.aad7270.
7
Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests.新热带次生林的生物量弹性。
Nature. 2016 Feb 11;530(7589):211-4. doi: 10.1038/nature16512. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
8
Carbon cycle. The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO₂ sink.碳循环。半干旱生态系统在陆地 CO₂ 汇的趋势和变化中的主导作用。
Science. 2015 May 22;348(6237):895-9. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1668. Epub 2015 May 21.
9
Long-term decline of the Amazon carbon sink.亚马逊碳汇的长期衰退。
Nature. 2015 Mar 19;519(7543):344-8. doi: 10.1038/nature14283.
10
Effect of increasing CO2 on the terrestrial carbon cycle.二氧化碳增加对陆地碳循环的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jan 13;112(2):436-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407302112. Epub 2014 Dec 29.