Suppr超能文献

利用推特评估对精神分裂症和精神病的态度。

Using Twitter to assess attitudes to schizophrenia and psychosis.

作者信息

Passerello Giorgianna L, Hazelwood James E, Lawrie Stephen

机构信息

Edinburgh Medical School, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine,University of Edinburgh,UK.

Royal Edinburgh Hospital,University of Edinburgh,UK.

出版信息

BJPsych Bull. 2019 Aug;43(4):158-166. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2018.115. Epub 2019 Feb 20.

Abstract

Aims and methodSchizophrenia is a psychotic disorder that is stereotypically stigmatised as untreatable and associated with violence. Several authorities have suggested that changing the name, for example to psychosis, would reduce such stigmatisation. We aimed to compare attitudes to schizophrenia and psychosis on Twitter to see if psychosis was associated with less negative attitudes. Tweets containing the terms 'schizophrenia', 'schizophrenic', 'psychosis' or 'psychotic' were collected on www.twitter.com and were captured with NCapture. On NVivo, tweets were coded into categories based on user type, tweet content, attitude and stigma type by two independent raters. We compared the content and attitudes of tweets referring to schizophrenia/schizophrenic and psychosis/psychotic. RESULTS: A total of 1120 tweets referring to schizophrenia/schizophrenic and 1080 referring to psychosis/psychotic were identified over two 7-day periods; 424 original tweets for schizophrenia and 416 original tweets for psychosis were included in the analysis. Psychosis was significantly more commonly included in tweets expressing negative attitudes (n=131, 31.5%) than schizophrenia (n=41, 9.7%) (χ² = 237.03, P < 0.0001). Of the personal opinions or dyadic interactions, 125 (53.4%) in the psychosis data set were stigmatising, compared with 33 (24.6%) of those in the schizophrenia set (χ² = 44.65, P < 0.0001).Clinical implicationsThe terms psychosis/psychotic are associated with a significantly higher number of tweets with negative content than schizophrenia/schizophrenic. Together with other evidence, this suggests that changing the name of schizophrenia to psychosis will not reduce negative attitudes toward the condition.Declaration of interestS.L. has received personal fees from Otsuka and Sunovion, and personal and research fees from Janssen.

摘要

目的与方法

精神分裂症是一种精神病性障碍,通常被污名化为无法治疗且与暴力行为相关。一些权威机构建议更改名称,比如改为“精神病”,以减少这种污名化。我们旨在比较推特上对精神分裂症和精神病的态度,看看“精神病”是否与较少的负面态度相关。在www.twitter.com上收集包含“精神分裂症”“精神分裂症患者”“精神病”或“精神病性的”等术语的推文,并使用NCapture进行捕获。在NVivo上,两名独立评分者根据用户类型、推文内容、态度和污名类型将推文编码分类。我们比较了提及精神分裂症/精神分裂症患者和精神病/精神病性的推文的内容和态度。

结果

在两个为期7天的时间段内,共识别出1120条提及精神分裂症/精神分裂症患者的推文和1080条提及精神病/精神病性的推文;分析纳入了424条关于精神分裂症的原始推文和416条关于精神病的原始推文。与精神分裂症(n = 41,9.7%)相比,在表达负面态度的推文中,“精神病”被提及的频率显著更高(n = 131,31.5%)(χ² = 237.03,P < 0.0001)。在个人观点或二元互动方面,精神病数据集中有125条(53.4%)存在污名化,而精神分裂症数据集中有33条(24.6%)存在污名化(χ² = 44.65,P < 0.0001)。

临床意义

与精神分裂症/精神分裂症患者相比,“精神病/精神病性的”这些术语在推文中与负面内容的关联度显著更高。结合其他证据来看,这表明将精神分裂症的名称改为“精神病”并不会减少对该疾病的负面态度。

利益声明

S.L. 已从大冢制药和太阳药业获得个人报酬,并从杨森制药获得个人报酬和研究经费。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4c6/6642990/2564359cb9c1/S2056469418001158_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验