• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交媒体中心理健康不良表现的检测方法有哪些?一项系统评价。

What methods are used to examine representation of mental ill-health on social media? A systematic review.

机构信息

School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, 1 Parklands Drive, 4222, Southport, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2024 Feb 29;12(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01603-1.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-024-01603-1
PMID:38424653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10905888/
Abstract

There has been an increasing number of papers which explore the representation of mental health on social media using various social media platforms and methodologies. It is timely to review methodologies employed in this growing body of research in order to understand their strengths and weaknesses. This systematic literature review provides a comprehensive overview and evaluation of the methods used to investigate the representation of mental ill-health on social media, shedding light on the current state of this field. Seven databases were searched with keywords related to social media, mental health, and aspects of representation (e.g., trivialisation or stigma). Of the 36 studies which met inclusion criteria, the most frequently selected social media platforms for data collection were Twitter (n = 22, 61.1%), Sina Weibo (n = 5, 13.9%) and YouTube (n = 4, 11.1%). The vast majority of studies analysed social media data using manual content analysis (n = 24, 66.7%), with limited studies employing more contemporary data analysis techniques, such as machine learning (n = 5, 13.9%). Few studies analysed visual data (n = 7, 19.4%). To enable a more complete understanding of mental ill-health representation on social media, further research is needed focussing on popular and influential image and video-based platforms, moving beyond text-based data like Twitter. Future research in this field should also employ a combination of both manual and computer-assisted approaches for analysis.

摘要

越来越多的论文探讨了使用各种社交媒体平台和方法在社交媒体上呈现心理健康的问题。及时审查这一不断发展的研究领域中使用的方法,以了解其优缺点是很重要的。本系统文献综述全面概述和评估了用于研究社交媒体上心理健康不良表现的方法,揭示了该领域的现状。使用与社交媒体、心理健康和表现方面(例如,淡化或污名化)相关的关键字搜索了七个数据库。在符合纳入标准的 36 项研究中,最常用于数据收集的社交媒体平台是 Twitter(n=22,61.1%)、新浪微博(n=5,13.9%)和 YouTube(n=4,11.1%)。绝大多数研究使用手动内容分析(n=24,66.7%)分析社交媒体数据,只有少数研究采用了更现代的数据分析技术,如机器学习(n=5,13.9%)。很少有研究分析视觉数据(n=7,19.4%)。为了更全面地了解社交媒体上心理健康不良的表现,需要进一步研究关注流行和有影响力的图像和视频为基础的平台,超越像 Twitter 这样的基于文本的数据。该领域的未来研究还应同时采用手动和计算机辅助分析方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9017/10905888/e1c78a54a7b7/40359_2024_1603_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9017/10905888/997051cccc83/40359_2024_1603_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9017/10905888/e1c78a54a7b7/40359_2024_1603_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9017/10905888/997051cccc83/40359_2024_1603_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9017/10905888/e1c78a54a7b7/40359_2024_1603_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
What methods are used to examine representation of mental ill-health on social media? A systematic review.社交媒体中心理健康不良表现的检测方法有哪些?一项系统评价。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Feb 29;12(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01603-1.
2
Medical and Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media: Bibliometric Study of the Scientific Literature.社交媒体上的医疗健康相关错误信息:科学文献的文献计量研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 25;24(1):e28152. doi: 10.2196/28152.
3
Methodologies for Monitoring Mental Health on Twitter: Systematic Review.监测 Twitter 上心理健康的方法:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 8;25:e42734. doi: 10.2196/42734.
4
A Novel Machine Learning Framework for Comparison of Viral COVID-19-Related Sina Weibo and Twitter Posts: Workflow Development and Content Analysis.一种用于比较病毒性 COVID-19 相关微博和推特帖子的新型机器学习框架:工作流程开发和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 6;23(1):e24889. doi: 10.2196/24889.
5
Topics and Sentiment Surrounding Vaping on Twitter and Reddit During the 2019 e-Cigarette and Vaping Use-Associated Lung Injury Outbreak: Comparative Study.主题和情绪围绕着 2019 年电子烟和蒸气相关肺损伤爆发期间 Twitter 和 Reddit 上的蒸气:比较研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 13;24(12):e39460. doi: 10.2196/39460.
6
Social media based surveillance systems for healthcare using machine learning: A systematic review.基于社交媒体的机器学习医疗保健监测系统:一项系统综述。
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Aug;108:103500. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103500. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
7
Mass media interventions for reducing mental health-related stigma.减少与心理健康相关污名化的大众媒体干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 23;2013(7):CD009453. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009453.pub2.
8
Concerns Expressed by Chinese Social Media Users During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Content Analysis of Sina Weibo Microblogging Data.新冠疫情期间中国社交媒体用户表达的担忧:对新浪微博数据的内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 26;22(11):e22152. doi: 10.2196/22152.
9
Linguistic Methodologies to Surveil the Leading Causes of Mortality: Scoping Review of Twitter for Public Health Data.语言方法监测主要死因:针对公共卫生数据的 Twitter 范围审查。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 12;25:e39484. doi: 10.2196/39484.
10
Stigma: the representation of mental health in UK newspaper Twitter feeds.污名:英国报纸推特推送中对心理健康的呈现
J Ment Health. 2021 Aug;30(4):424-430. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2019.1608937. Epub 2019 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A Social Media Study of Portrayals of Bipolar Disorders on YouTube: Content and Thematic Analyses.一项关于YouTube上双相情感障碍描绘的社交媒体研究:内容与主题分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 25;27:e67129. doi: 10.2196/67129.

本文引用的文献

1
Public perceptions on Twitter of nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic.公众在新冠疫情期间对护士的看法在推特上的体现。
Contemp Nurse. 2022 Oct-Dec;58(5-6):414-423. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2022.2147850. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
2
Investigating mental health service user views of stigma on Twitter during COVID-19: a mixed-methods study.调查 COVID-19 期间 Twitter 上精神卫生服务使用者对污名的看法:一项混合方法研究。
J Ment Health. 2022 Aug;31(4):576-584. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2022.2091763. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
3
Social media and attitudes towards a COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review of the literature.
社交媒体与对新冠疫苗接种的态度:文献系统综述
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Jun;48:101454. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101454. Epub 2022 May 20.
4
Deconstructing TikTok Videos on Mental Health: Cross-sectional, Descriptive Content Analysis.剖析TikTok上关于心理健康的视频:横断面描述性内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2022 May 19;6(5):e38340. doi: 10.2196/38340.
5
Characterizing the content, messaging, and tone of trichotillomania on YouTube: A content analysis.YouTube上拔毛癖的内容、信息传递及语气特征:一项内容分析
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Jul;151:150-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.04.022. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
6
Quantifying Changes in the Language Used Around Mental Health on Twitter Over 10 Years: Observational Study.量化推特上十年间心理健康相关用语的变化:观察性研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Mar 30;9(3):e33685. doi: 10.2196/33685.
7
Detecting and Measuring Depression on Social Media Using a Machine Learning Approach: Systematic Review.使用机器学习方法在社交媒体上检测和测量抑郁症:系统评价
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Mar 1;9(3):e27244. doi: 10.2196/27244.
8
Psychiatry on Twitter: Content Analysis of the Use of Psychiatric Terms in French.推特上的精神病学:法语中精神病学术语使用情况的内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Feb 14;6(2):e18539. doi: 10.2196/18539.
9
Does gender matter? The association between different digital media activities and adolescent well-being.性别有影响吗?不同数字媒体活动与青少年幸福感之间的关联。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 10;22(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12670-7.
10
Identifying schizophrenia stigma on Twitter: a proof of principle model using service user supervised machine learning.在推特上识别精神分裂症污名:一个使用服务使用者监督机器学习的原理验证模型。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2022 Feb 7;8(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41537-021-00197-6.