University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, ON, Canada.
Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;60(3):325-327. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13005.
In 1989, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child solidified that “the child who is capable of forming his or her own views [has] the right to express those views freely in all matters affecting the child.” Involving children as research participants is one key method of ensuring that children’s voices are heard, especially in psychological science where researchers gather information from children across clinical, developmental, health, cognitive, and social research contexts and in related fields like psychiatry, social work, nursing, and medicine. How we talk to children as researchers affects whether we produce rigorous science, and a consensus that has emerged from decades of research on children’s eyewitness testimony demands that we pause for critical self-reflection. In this piece, we propose that scientists studying children consider a large but siloed body of work on developmentally-sensitive investigative interviewing to facilitate complete, accurate, and honest responding from children in research studies. By examining how researchers phrase questions, how they contextualize questioning, and how they report methodology, we address concrete avenues for ensuring robust and reliable psychological science, as well as pathways for children’s optimal involvement in the research process.
1989 年,《联合国儿童权利公约》明确规定,“能够形成自己观点的儿童[有权]在所有影响儿童的事项上自由表达这些观点。”让儿童作为研究参与者是确保儿童声音被听到的一种关键方法,特别是在心理学科学领域,研究人员从临床、发展、健康、认知和社会研究背景以及精神病学、社会工作、护理和医学等相关领域收集儿童的信息。作为研究人员与儿童交谈的方式会影响我们是否能产生严谨的科学,几十年来对儿童目击证词的研究已经达成共识,要求我们进行批判性的自我反思。在这篇文章中,我们建议研究儿童的科学家考虑大量但分散的关于发展敏感调查访谈的工作,以促进儿童在研究中完整、准确和诚实地回答问题。通过研究研究人员如何提问、如何使问题语境化以及如何报告方法,我们为确保强大可靠的心理学科学以及儿童在研究过程中的最佳参与提供了具体途径。