• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Children's accuracy in answering Why and How Come questions.儿童回答“为什么”和“怎么会这样”问题的准确性。
Int J Behav Dev. 2021 May;45(3):238-243. doi: 10.1177/0165025420979364. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
2
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.
3
Order of Encoding Predicts Young Children's Responses to Sequencing Questions.编码顺序可预测幼儿对排序问题的反应。
Cogn Dev. 2020 Jul-Sep;55. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100927. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
4
Nearly 4 years after an event: children's eyewitness memory and adults' perceptions of children's accuracy.事件发生近4年后:儿童的目击证人记忆及成人对儿童记忆准确性的认知。
Child Abuse Negl. 2002 Aug;26(8):849-84. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(02)00354-x.
5
Say it once again: effects of repeated questions on children's event recall.
J Trauma Stress. 1995 Oct;8(4):555-80. doi: 10.1007/BF02102889.
6
The role of repeated interviewing in children's responses to cross-examination-style questioning.重复访谈在儿童对交叉讯问式提问的反应中的作用。
Br J Psychol. 2013 Feb;104(1):14-38. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02096.x. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
7
How does Google get its information?: Children's judgements about Google search.谷歌如何获取信息?:儿童对谷歌搜索的判断。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2024 Sep;42(3):334-347. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12487. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
8
Spatial language, question type, and young children's ability to describe clothing: Legal and developmental implications.空间语言、问题类型与幼儿描述衣物的能力:法律和发展的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2017 Aug;41(4):398-409. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000237. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
9
The experiences of acute non-surgical pain of children who present to a healthcare facility for treatment: a systematic review protocol.前往医疗机构接受治疗的儿童急性非手术疼痛经历:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):12-20. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2466.
10
Use of context in question answering by 3-, 4- and 5-year-old children.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2003 Jul;32(4):397-415. doi: 10.1023/a:1024847529077.

本文引用的文献

1
Adults' Perceptions of Children's Referentially Ambiguous Responses.成年人对儿童指代不明回应的认知。
Psychol Crime Law. 2019;25(7):729-738. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2018.1552757. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
2
Editorial Perspective: Questioning kids: applying the lessons from developmentally sensitive investigative interviewing to the research context.社论观点:质疑儿童:将发展敏感型调查性访谈的经验教训应用于研究情境。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;60(3):325-327. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13005.
3
The Productivity of Wh- Prompts in Child Forensic Interviews.儿童法医访谈中 Wh- 提示的生产力。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Jul;33(13):2007-2015. doi: 10.1177/0886260515621084. Epub 2015 Dec 13.
4
Young children's difficulty with indirect speech acts: implications for questioning child witnesses.幼儿在间接言语行为方面的困难:对询问儿童证人的启示。
Behav Sci Law. 2014 Nov-Dec;32(6):775-88. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2142. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
5
Do young children always say yes to yes-no questions? A metadevelopmental study of the affirmation bias.幼儿总是对是非问题回答“是”吗?一项关于肯定性偏差的元发展研究。
Child Dev. 2003 Sep-Oct;74(5):1297-313. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00608.
6
Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech.特殊疑问句中习得顺序的决定因素:重新评估照顾者言语的作用。
J Child Lang. 2003 Aug;30(3):609-35.
7
Young children's acquisition of wh-questions: the role of structured input.
J Child Lang. 2003 Feb;30(1):117-43. doi: 10.1017/s0305000902005457.
8
Metalinguistic awareness in children: a developmental progression.
J Psycholinguist Res. 1999 Jul;28(4):313-29. doi: 10.1023/a:1023275214000.

儿童回答“为什么”和“怎么会这样”问题的准确性。

Children's accuracy in answering Why and How Come questions.

作者信息

Wylie Breanne E, Stolzenberg Stacia N, Evans Angela D

机构信息

Brock University, Canada.

Arizona State University, USA.

出版信息

Int J Behav Dev. 2021 May;45(3):238-243. doi: 10.1177/0165025420979364. Epub 2021 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1177/0165025420979364
PMID:35989980
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9387754/
Abstract

Children's developing understanding of language may influence their ability to accurately respond to questions inquiring about their event knowledge (i.e., Why and How Come questions), potentially creating misinterpretations in adult-child communication. The present study examined 120 5-, 7-, and 9-year-old's accuracy in responding to Why and How Come questions about the cause of their behaviors. Children's accuracy improved with age, highlighting a developmental milestone whereby children become highly accurate by 7 years of age. Further, the semantic differences in question type did not influence children's responses, as there were no differences in children's accuracy when answering Why or How Come questions. The findings from this study highlight the developmental shift in children's abilities to answer Why and How Come questions, and thus the importance of considering the age and linguistic abilities of the child when inquiring about their event knowledge.

摘要

儿童对语言的逐渐理解可能会影响他们准确回答询问其事件知识的问题(即“为什么”和“怎么会”问题)的能力,这可能会在成人与儿童的交流中造成误解。本研究考察了120名5岁、7岁和9岁儿童回答关于其行为原因的“为什么”和“怎么会”问题的准确性。儿童的准确性随着年龄的增长而提高,这突出了一个发展里程碑,即儿童到7岁时回答问题的准确性会变得很高。此外,问题类型的语义差异并未影响儿童的回答,因为儿童回答“为什么”或“怎么会”问题时的准确性没有差异。这项研究的结果突出了儿童回答“为什么”和“怎么会”问题能力的发展转变,因此在询问儿童的事件知识时,考虑儿童的年龄和语言能力非常重要。