• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

空间语言、问题类型与幼儿描述衣物的能力:法律和发展的影响。

Spatial language, question type, and young children's ability to describe clothing: Legal and developmental implications.

机构信息

School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Arizona State University.

Gould School of Law, and Department of Psychology, University of Southern California.

出版信息

Law Hum Behav. 2017 Aug;41(4):398-409. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000237. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1037/lhb0000237
PMID:28150976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5524603/
Abstract

Children's descriptions of clothing placement and touching with respect to clothing are central to assessing child sexual abuse allegations. This study examined children's ability to answer the types of questions attorneys and interviewers typically ask about clothing, using the most common spatial terms (on/off, outside/inside, over/under). Ninety-seven 3- to 6-year-olds were asked yes/no (e.g., "Is the shirt on?"), forced-choice (e.g., "Is the shirt on or off?"), open-choice (e.g., "Is the shirt on or off or something else?"), or where questions (e.g., "Where is the shirt?") about clothing using a human figurine, clothing, and stickers. Across question types, children generally did well with simple clothing or sticker placement (e.g., pants completely on), except for yes/no questions about "over," suggesting children had an underinclusive understanding of the word. When clothing or sticker placement was intermediate (e.g., pants around ankles, and therefore neither completely on nor off), children performed poorly except when asked where questions. A similar task using only stickers and boxes, analogous to forensic interviewers' assessments of children's understanding, was only weakly predictive of children's ability to describe clothing. The results suggest that common methods of questioning young children about clothing may lead to substantial misinterpretation. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

儿童对衣物放置和触摸的描述是评估儿童性虐待指控的核心。本研究通过使用最常见的空间术语(上/下、内/外、上/下),考察了儿童回答律师和访谈者通常就衣物提出的各种问题的能力。97 名 3 至 6 岁的儿童被要求回答是/否(例如,“衬衫在身上吗?”)、强制选择(例如,“衬衫是在身上还是在身上?”)、开放选择(例如,“衬衫在身上还是在身上还是别的什么地方?”)或关于衣物的位置(例如,“衬衫在哪里?”)的问题,使用的是人体模型、衣物和贴纸。在各种问题类型中,儿童通常在简单的衣物或贴纸放置(例如,裤子完全在身上)方面表现良好,除了关于“在……之上”的是/否问题,这表明儿童对这个词的理解是不全面的。当衣物或贴纸的放置是中间的(例如,裤子在脚踝周围,因此既不完全在身上也不完全在身上),儿童表现不佳,除了当被问到位置问题时。一个只使用贴纸和盒子的类似任务,类似于法医访谈者对儿童理解的评估,仅能微弱地预测儿童描述衣物的能力。结果表明,常见的询问儿童有关衣物的问题方法可能会导致严重的误解。

相似文献

1
Spatial language, question type, and young children's ability to describe clothing: Legal and developmental implications.空间语言、问题类型与幼儿描述衣物的能力:法律和发展的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2017 Aug;41(4):398-409. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000237. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
2
Young Children's Ability to Describe Intermediate Clothing Placement.幼儿描述衣物中层位置的能力。
Child Maltreat. 2021 Feb;26(1):87-94. doi: 10.1177/1077559520930825. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
3
'Where were your clothes?' Eliciting descriptions of clothing placement from children alleging sexual abuse in criminal trials and forensic interviews.“你的衣服在哪里?”在刑事审判和法医询问中,从声称遭受性虐待的儿童那里获取衣物放置情况的描述。
Legal Criminol Psychol. 2017 Sep;22(2):197-212. doi: 10.1111/lcrp.12094. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
4
"How did you feel?": increasing child sexual abuse witnesses' production of evaluative information.“你感觉如何?”:增加儿童性虐待目击证人提供评价信息。
Law Hum Behav. 2012 Oct;36(5):448-57. doi: 10.1037/h0093986. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
5
Children's disclosures of sexual abuse: learning from direct inquiry.儿童对性虐待的披露:从直接询问中学习。
Child Abuse Negl. 2011 May;35(5):343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.01.014.
6
Attorneys' Questions and Children's Responses Referring to the Nature of Sexual Touch in Child Sexual Abuse Trials.律师提问与儿童在儿童性虐待审判中对性接触性质的回答。
Child Maltreat. 2023 Aug;28(3):438-449. doi: 10.1177/10775595231161033. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
7
Assessing the effectiveness of the NICHD investigative interview protocol when interviewing French-speaking alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Quebec.评估美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所(NICHD)调查性访谈方案在对魁北克说法语的儿童性虐待指控受害者进行访谈时的有效性。
Child Abuse Negl. 2009 May;33(5):257-68. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.04.002. Epub 2009 May 28.
8
Impact of interviewers' supportive comments and children's reluctance to cooperate during sexual abuse disclosure.访谈者的支持性评论及儿童在披露性虐待过程中不愿合作的影响。
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 May;43:112-22. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
9
Young children's difficulty with indirect speech acts: implications for questioning child witnesses.幼儿在间接言语行为方面的困难:对询问儿童证人的启示。
Behav Sci Law. 2014 Nov-Dec;32(6):775-88. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2142. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
10
Eliciting accounts of alleged child sexual abuse: how do children report touch?获取关于儿童性虐待指控的陈述:儿童如何报告被触摸的情况?
J Child Sex Abus. 2014;23(7):792-803. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2014.950400.

引用本文的文献

1
"This Incident Happened When There Were 10 People in the House?" Exploring a Framework to Categorize Defense Attorneys' Plausibility Questioning in CSA Trials.“这起事件发生时房子里有10个人?”探索一种在CSA审判中对辩护律师合理性质疑进行分类的框架。
Psychol Crime Law. 2024;30(6):556-582. doi: 10.1080/1068316x.2022.2104277. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
2
Children's Elaborated Responses to Yes-No Questions in Forensic Interviews About Sexual Abuse.儿童在性虐待法医访谈中对是非问题的详细回应。
Child Maltreat. 2024 Nov;29(4):637-647. doi: 10.1177/10775595231220228. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
3
Initial Medical Assessment of Possible Child Sexual Abuse: History, History, History.可能遭受儿童性虐待的初始医学评估:病史,病史,还是病史。
Acad Pediatr. 2024 May-Jun;24(4):562-569. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2023.11.013. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
4
Child Witnesses Productively Respond to "How" Questions About Evaluations but Struggle With Other "How" Questions.儿童证人可以有效地回答关于评估的“如何”问题,但在其他“如何”问题上则存在困难。
Child Maltreat. 2023 Aug;28(3):417-426. doi: 10.1177/10775595231175913. Epub 2023 May 14.
5
"DID YOU EVER FIGHT BACK?": Jurors' Questions to Children Testifying in Criminal Trials About Alleged Sexual Abuse.“你曾反击过吗?”:陪审员在刑事审判中对指称遭受性虐待儿童证人的提问
Crim Justice Behav. 2020 Aug;47(8):1032-1054. doi: 10.1177/0093854820935960. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
6
Increasing maltreated and nonmaltreated children's recall disclosures of a minor transgression: The effects of back-channel utterances, a promise to tell the truth, and a post-recall putative confession.增加受虐待和未受虐待儿童对轻微违规行为的回忆披露:回应语、承诺说实话和事后假定自白对回忆的影响。
Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Jun;116(Pt 1):104073. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104073. Epub 2019 Aug 11.
7
Editorial Perspective: Questioning kids: applying the lessons from developmentally sensitive investigative interviewing to the research context.社论观点:质疑儿童:将发展敏感型调查性访谈的经验教训应用于研究情境。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;60(3):325-327. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13005.
8
Ask versus tell: Potential confusion when child witnesses are questioned about conversations.询问与告知:当询问儿童证人关于对话的情况时可能存在的混淆。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2017 Dec;23(4):447-459. doi: 10.1037/xap0000136. Epub 2017 Aug 28.

本文引用的文献

1
'Where were your clothes?' Eliciting descriptions of clothing placement from children alleging sexual abuse in criminal trials and forensic interviews.“你的衣服在哪里?”在刑事审判和法医询问中,从声称遭受性虐待的儿童那里获取衣物放置情况的描述。
Legal Criminol Psychol. 2017 Sep;22(2):197-212. doi: 10.1111/lcrp.12094. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
2
The development of spatial category representations from 4 to 7 years.4至7岁空间类别表征的发展
Br J Dev Psychol. 2016 Nov;34(4):555-568. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12149. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
3
The Productivity of Wh- Prompts in Child Forensic Interviews.儿童法医访谈中 Wh- 提示的生产力。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Jul;33(13):2007-2015. doi: 10.1177/0886260515621084. Epub 2015 Dec 13.
4
How Attorneys Question Children About the Dynamics of Sexual Abuse and Disclosure in Criminal Trials.律师在刑事审判中如何询问儿童关于性虐待的情况及披露过程。
Psychol Public Policy Law. 2014 Jan 1;20(1):19-30. doi: 10.1037/a0035000.
5
Coaching, truth induction, and young maltreated children's false allegations and false denials.辅导、真相诱导与受虐儿童的虚假指控和否认
Child Dev. 2008 Jul-Aug;79(4):914-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01167.x.
6
Children's eyewitness reports after exposure to misinformation from parents.儿童在接触到来自父母的错误信息后的目击报告。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2001 Mar;7(1):27-50. doi: 10.1037//1076-898x.7.1.27.
7
The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish.
J Child Lang. 1979 Oct;6(3):529-45. doi: 10.1017/s030500090000252x.