• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过结石衰减值预测体外冲击波碎石术的疗效。

Predicting effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy by stone attenuation value.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2010 Jul;24(7):1169-73. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0124.

DOI:10.1089/end.2010.0124
PMID:20575686
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of stone attenuation value on the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for upper urinary tract stones.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 99 patients underwent SWL for solitary renal and upper ureteral stones from January 2007 to March 2009. All patients underwent CT scan before SWL. The mean attenuation value of stones in our study was 1213.3 +/- 314.5 Hounsfield units (HU). Group A consisted of 42 patients with stones of attenuation value <1200 HU and group B had 57 patients with stones of attenuation value >1200 HU. Stone size, location, requirement of number of shockwaves, shock intensities (power), retreatment rate, complication rate, auxiliary procedure rate, and effectiveness quotient (EQ) ratio were studied.

RESULTS

The mean total number of shocks required to fragment the stones in groups A and B were 1317.1 +/- 345.3 and 1646.5 +/- 610.8, respectively (p = 0.001), with a mean shock intensity of 12.2 +/- 0.7 and 12.4 +/- 0.5 kV, respectively (p = 0.03). Retreatment was not required in patients of group A, but 14.03% patients in group B required retreatment (p < 0.0001). Clearance rate in group A was 88.1%, whereas in group B it was 82.5% (p = 0.35). Auxiliary procedure rates were 9.5% and 10.5% in groups A and B (p = 0.22), respectively. EQ was 80.4% and 66.2% in groups A and B (p = 0.03), respectively. Complication rates were similar with 2.4% and 3.5% in groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.37). Significant correlation was recorded for total number and intensity of shocks with stone attenuation value.

CONCLUSIONS

The EQ of SWL for upper urinary tract stones was significantly better for stones with lower attenuation value. The number and intensity of shocks required to fragment these stones with lower attenuation value were also significantly lower.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估结石衰减值对上尿路结石体外冲击波碎石(SWL)效果的影响。

方法

本前瞻性研究纳入了 2007 年 1 月至 2009 年 3 月间因单发肾结石和上段输尿管结石而接受 SWL 的 99 例患者。所有患者在 SWL 前均接受 CT 扫描。本研究中结石的平均衰减值为 1213.3 ± 314.5 亨氏单位(HU)。A 组包括 42 例衰减值<1200 HU 的结石患者,B 组包括 57 例衰减值>1200 HU 的结石患者。研究了结石大小、位置、所需冲击波数量、冲击波强度(功率)、再次治疗率、并发症率、辅助治疗率和有效率(EQ)比值。

结果

A 组和 B 组碎裂结石所需的总冲击波数分别为 1317.1 ± 345.3 和 1646.5 ± 610.8(p = 0.001),平均冲击波强度分别为 12.2 ± 0.7 和 12.4 ± 0.5 kV(p = 0.03)。A 组患者无需再次治疗,但 B 组中有 14.03%的患者需要再次治疗(p<0.0001)。A 组的清除率为 88.1%,而 B 组为 82.5%(p = 0.35)。A 组和 B 组的辅助治疗率分别为 9.5%和 10.5%(p = 0.22)。A 组和 B 组的 EQ 分别为 80.4%和 66.2%(p = 0.03)。A 组和 B 组的并发症发生率分别为 2.4%和 3.5%(p = 0.37)。总冲击波数和强度与结石衰减值呈显著相关。

结论

SWL 治疗上尿路结石的 EQ 对于衰减值较低的结石更好。对于衰减值较低的结石,所需的冲击波数量和强度也显著较低。

相似文献

1
Predicting effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy by stone attenuation value.通过结石衰减值预测体外冲击波碎石术的疗效。
J Endourol. 2010 Jul;24(7):1169-73. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0124.
2
A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.高分辨率CT参数预测上尿路结石体外冲击波碎石术成功率的前瞻性评估
J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1227-1232. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0364. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
3
Can we predict the ancillary treatments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal and upper ureteral stones?我们能否预测体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石和输尿管上段结石后的辅助治疗?
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022 Dec 27;94(4):439-442. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2022.4.439.
4
Treatment for extended-mid and distal ureteral stones: SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study.中段及下段输尿管结石的治疗:体外冲击波碎石术还是输尿管镜检查?一项多中心研究的结果
J Endourol. 1999 Dec;13(10):727-33. doi: 10.1089/end.1999.13.727.
5
A prospective randomized comparison between early (<48 hours of onset of colicky pain) versus delayed shockwave lithotripsy for symptomatic upper ureteral calculi: a single center experience.一项针对症状性上尿路结石的前瞻性随机比较:早期(绞痛发作后<48 小时)与延迟冲击波碎石术的比较:单中心经验。
J Endourol. 2010 Dec;24(12):2059-66. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0066. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
6
Which is the best treatment of pediatric upper urinary tract stones among extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review.体外冲击波碎石术、经皮肾镜取石术和逆行性肾内手术治疗小儿上尿路结石的最佳治疗方法:系统评价。
BMC Urol. 2019 Oct 23;19(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0520-2.
7
Comparative results of shockwave lithotripsy for renal calculi in upper, middle, and lower calices.冲击波碎石术治疗肾上、中、下盏肾结石的对比结果。
J Endourol. 2007 Sep;21(9):951-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0275.
8
Piezoelectric shockwave lithotripsy of urinary calculi: comparative study of stone depth in kidney and ureter treatments.尿石症的压电冲击波碎石术:肾脏和输尿管治疗中结石深度的比较研究
J Endourol. 1999 Dec;13(10):699-703. doi: 10.1089/end.1999.13.699.
9
A new optical coupling control technique and application in SWL.一种新的光学耦合控制技术及其在冲击波碎石术中的应用。
Urolithiasis. 2016 Nov;44(6):539-544. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0874-9. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
10
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children: equivalent clearance rates to adults is achieved with fewer and lower energy shock waves.儿童体外冲击波碎石术:通过较少且较低能量的冲击波可实现与成人相当的结石清除率。
BJU Int. 2009 Jan;103(1):81-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07887.x. Epub 2008 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for adult renal transplant de novo graft lithiasis: a single center analysis and systematic review of the literature.经皮肾镜取石术治疗成人肾移植术后新移植肾结石:单中心分析和文献系统评价。
World J Urol. 2024 Jun 13;42(1):373. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05079-x.
2
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: retrospective study on possible predictors of treatment success and revisiting the role of non-contrast-enhanced computer tomography in kidney and ureteral stone disease.体外冲击波碎石术:治疗成功的可能预测因素的回顾性研究及重新探讨非增强计算机断层扫描在肾结石和输尿管结石病中的作用。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Apr 17;52(1):65. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01570-7.
3
Role of Hounsfield Unit in Predicting Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi: Outcomes of a Systematic Review.
Hounsfield 单位在预测冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石结局中的作用:系统评价结果。
Curr Urol Rep. 2023 Apr;24(4):173-185. doi: 10.1007/s11934-023-01145-w. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
4
Computed tomography window affects kidney stones measurements.计算机断层扫描窗宽影响肾结石的测量。
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Sep-Oct;45(5):948-955. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0819.
5
Comparison of Outcomes between Two Methods to Extract Stone Fragments during Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.两种方法在软性输尿管镜碎石术中取石碎片的结果比较。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 30;2018:4526721. doi: 10.1155/2018/4526721. eCollection 2018.
6
How can and should we optimize extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?我们应如何以及应该如何优化体外冲击波碎石术?
Urolithiasis. 2018 Feb;46(1):3-17. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1020-z. Epub 2017 Nov 25.
7
Treatment selection for urolithiasis: percutaneous nephrolithomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring.尿路结石的治疗选择:经皮肾镜碎石术、输尿管镜碎石术、体外冲击波碎石术和主动监测。
World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1395-1399. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2030-8. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
8
Complications of retrograde intrarenal surgery classified by the modified Clavien grading system.经改良 Clavien 分级系统分类的逆行性肾内手术并发症。
Urolithiasis. 2018 Apr;46(2):197-202. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0961-6. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
9
An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques.肾脏结石影像学技术概述。
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Nov;13(11):654-662. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.154. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
10
Arguments for choosing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for removal of urinary tract stones.选择体外冲击波碎石术治疗尿路结石的理由。
Urolithiasis. 2015 Oct;43(5):387-96. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0818-9. Epub 2015 Aug 28.