1 Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.
2 School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Chron Respir Dis. 2019 Jan-Dec;16:1479973118816448. doi: 10.1177/1479973118816448.
Chronic breathlessness is highly distressing for people with advanced disease and their informal carers, yet health services for this group remain highly heterogeneous. We aimed to generate evidence-based stakeholder-endorsed recommendations for practice, policy and research concerning services for people with advanced disease and chronic breathlessness. We used transparent expert consultation, comprising modified nominal group technique during a stakeholder workshop, and an online consensus survey. Stakeholders, representing multiple specialities and professions, and patient/carers were invited to participate. Thirty-seven participants attended the stakeholder workshop and generated 34 separate recommendations, rated by 74 online survey respondents. Seven recommendations had strong agreement and high levels of consensus. Stakeholders agreed services should be person-centred and flexible, should cut across multiple disciplines and providers and should prioritize breathlessness management in its own right. They advocated for wide geographical coverage and access to expert care, supported through skills-sharing among professionals. They also recommended recognition of informal carers and their role by clinicians and policymakers. Overall, stakeholders' recommendations reflect the need for improved access to person-centred, multi-professional care and support for carers to provide or access breathlessness management interventions. Future research should test the optimal models of care and educational strategies to meet these recommendations.
慢性呼吸困难会给晚期疾病患者及其非正式护理者带来极大的痛苦,但针对这一群体的卫生服务仍然高度多样化。我们旨在为晚期疾病和慢性呼吸困难患者的服务制定基于证据、得到利益相关者认可的实践、政策和研究建议。我们采用了透明的专家咨询方法,包括利益相关者研讨会期间的改良名义群体技术和在线共识调查。邀请了代表多个专业和职业的利益相关者以及患者/护理人员参加。37 名参与者参加了利益相关者研讨会,并提出了 34 项单独的建议,由 74 名在线调查受访者进行了评分。有 7 项建议得到了强烈的认可和高度的共识。利益相关者一致认为,服务应该以患者为中心且灵活,应该跨越多个学科和提供者,并应优先考虑呼吸急促管理本身。他们主张在广泛的地理区域内提供服务并让患者能够获得专家护理,并通过专业人员之间的技能共享来支持这一目标。他们还建议临床医生和政策制定者认可非正式护理者及其作用。总体而言,利益相关者的建议反映了需要更好地获得以患者为中心、多专业的护理和对护理者的支持,以便提供或获得呼吸急促管理干预措施。未来的研究应该测试满足这些建议的最佳护理模式和教育策略。