• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对所有胰体和胰尾肿瘤的根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术:理论依据与结果

Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for all pancreatic body and tail tumors: rationale and results.

作者信息

Sivasanker Masillamany, Desouza Ashwin, Bhandare Manish, Chaudhari Vikram, Goel Mahesh, Shrikhande Shailesh V

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India.

Department of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Ernest Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Mar;404(2):183-190. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01763-4. Epub 2019 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-019-01763-4
PMID:30790046
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) has been propagated as the standard of care for pancreatic cancers involving the body and tail of the pancreas. This procedure has been shown to have promising results in enhancing the microscopically negative tangential resection margins as well as the lymph node yield.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database on the resections performed for all pancreatic body and tail tumors at Tata Memorial Centre.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients underwent RAMPS without any perioperative mortality. The various pathologies comprised of adenocarcinoma (41.5%), neuroendocrine tumors (12.3%), solid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasm (15.3%), cystic neoplasms (15.2%), etc. The R0 resection rate was 87.7%. Among this cohort, 27 patients had pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The 3-year OS and DFS for distal pancreatic cancers were 56% and 38%, respectively, but 3-year OS and DFS for other distal pancreatic tumors were 97% and 73%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, R0 resection significantly improved disease-free survival (p = 0.023) for pancreatic cancer.

CONCLUSION

RAMPS procedure aids to achieve high negative tangential margins for all tumors involving the body and tail of the pancreas and not just pancreatic cancer in isolation. Since preoperative histologic diagnosis is not routinely indicated and also a number of other distal pancreatic tumors carry a relatively better prognosis compared with pancreatic cancer, our results provide further evidence that RAMPS should be considered as the procedure of choice for all operable tumors involving body and tail of the pancreas.

摘要

背景

根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)已被推广为治疗累及胰体和胰尾的胰腺癌的标准术式。该手术在提高显微镜下切缘阴性率以及淋巴结清扫数量方面已显示出有前景的结果。

方法

这是一项对塔塔纪念中心所有胰体和胰尾肿瘤切除术的前瞻性维护数据库的回顾性分析。

结果

65例患者接受了RAMPS手术,无围手术期死亡。各种病理类型包括腺癌(41.5%)、神经内分泌肿瘤(12.3%)、实性假乳头状上皮性肿瘤(15.3%)、囊性肿瘤(15.2%)等。R0切除率为87.7%。在该队列中,27例患者患有胰腺腺癌。胰体尾癌的3年总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)分别为56%和38%,但其他胰体尾肿瘤的3年OS和DFS分别为97%和73%。多因素分析显示,R0切除显著改善了胰腺癌的无病生存率(p = 0.023)。

结论

RAMPS手术有助于为所有累及胰体和胰尾的肿瘤,而不仅仅是孤立的胰腺癌,实现高阴性切缘。由于术前组织学诊断并非常规必需,而且与胰腺癌相比,许多其他胰体尾肿瘤的预后相对较好,我们的结果提供了进一步的证据,表明RAMPS应被视为所有可切除的累及胰体和胰尾肿瘤的首选手术方式。

相似文献

1
Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for all pancreatic body and tail tumors: rationale and results.针对所有胰体和胰尾肿瘤的根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术:理论依据与结果
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Mar;404(2):183-190. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01763-4. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
2
Single institution results of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of pancreas in 78 patients.78例胰腺体尾部腺癌患者行根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术的单中心结果。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016 Jul;23(7):432-41. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.362. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
3
Comparison of standard distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy.标准远端胰腺切除术和脾切除术与根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术的比较。
Am Surg. 2014 Mar;80(3):295-300.
4
Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus conventional distal pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: findings of a multicenter, retrospective, propensity score matching study.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与传统胰体尾切除术治疗左侧胰腺癌的比较:一项多中心回顾性倾向评分匹配研究的结果。
Surg Today. 2021 Nov;51(11):1775-1786. doi: 10.1007/s00595-021-02280-y. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
5
[Comparison of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy with conventional distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail].根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术与传统远端胰腺切除术治疗胰体尾腺癌的比较
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jul 1;58(7):505-511. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20200413-00301.
6
A LASSO Cox Regression Predictive Model for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Pancreatic Body and Tail Adenocarcinoma Patients: Comparative Long-Term Survival Analysis of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Standard Retrograde Pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS).用于接受胰体尾腺癌手术患者的 LASSO Cox 回归预测模型:根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术 (RAMPS) 和标准逆行胰脾切除术 (SPRS) 的比较长期生存分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Nov;31(12):8317-8326. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15939-w. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
7
Standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy versus radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for body and tail pancreatic adenocarcinoma.标准逆行胰脾切除术与根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗胰体尾腺癌的比较
Am Surg. 2013 Nov;79(11):1154-8.
8
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Standard Retrograde Pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS) for Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与标准逆行胰脾切除术(SPRS)治疗左侧胰腺癌的手术结果比较
World J Surg. 2016 Sep;40(9):2267-75. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3526-x.
9
Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗胰腺体尾部腺癌:获得切缘阴性的能力
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Feb;204(2):244-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.11.002. Epub 2007 Jan 4.
10
Left kidney mobilization technique during radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS).根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)中左肾的游离技术。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Mar;404(2):247-252. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01767-0. Epub 2019 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A LASSO Cox Regression Predictive Model for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Pancreatic Body and Tail Adenocarcinoma Patients: Comparative Long-Term Survival Analysis of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Standard Retrograde Pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS).用于接受胰体尾腺癌手术患者的 LASSO Cox 回归预测模型:根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术 (RAMPS) 和标准逆行胰脾切除术 (SPRS) 的比较长期生存分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Nov;31(12):8317-8326. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15939-w. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
2
Evaluating the efficacy of laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy in selected early-stage left-sided pancreatic cancer: a propensity score matching study.评价腹腔镜根治性顺行模块胰脾切除术治疗选择性早期左侧胰腺癌的疗效:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3578-3589. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10868-x. Epub 2024 May 15.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Tumors of the Pancreatic Body and Tail.胰体尾部肿瘤
World J Oncol. 2010 Apr;1(2):52-65. doi: 10.4021/wjon2010.04.200w. Epub 2010 Apr 30.
2
Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (ESPAC-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.比较吉西他滨和卡培他滨辅助治疗与吉西他滨单药治疗可切除胰腺癌患者的效果(ESPAC-4):一项多中心、开放标签、随机、3 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2017 Mar 11;389(10073):1011-1024. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32409-6. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
3
The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After.
Comparison of Survival Outcomes between Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy and Conventional Distal Pancreatosplenectomy for Pancreatic Body and Tail Cancer: Korean Multicenter Propensity Score Match Analysis.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术与传统远端胰脾切除术治疗胰体尾癌的生存结果比较:韩国多中心倾向评分匹配分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 18;16(8):1546. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081546.
4
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant disease: a review of techniques and results.腹腔镜下远端胰腺切除术治疗良性和恶性疾病:技术与结果综述
Prz Gastroenterol. 2022;17(2):103-109. doi: 10.5114/pg.2021.109625. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
5
Complications in Distal Pancreatectomy versus Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy: A Disease Risk Score Analysis Utilizing National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Data.远端胰腺切除术与根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术的并发症:利用国家手术质量改进计划数据的疾病风险评分分析。
World J Surg. 2022 Jul;46(7):1768-1775. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06545-6. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
6
Incidence and risk factors for Chyle leak after pancreatic surgery for cancer: A comprehensive systematic review.癌症胰手术后乳糜漏的发生率及危险因素:全面系统综述。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Apr;48(4):707-717. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.136. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
7
Comparison of Characteristics and Survival Rates of Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma according to Tumor Location.根据肿瘤位置比较可切除性胰腺导管腺癌的特征和生存率
Biomedicines. 2021 Nov 17;9(11):1706. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9111706.
8
Improvement in distal pancreatectomy for tumors in the body and tail of the pancreas.胰腺体尾部肿瘤行胰体尾切除术的改进。
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb 15;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02159-9.
9
Innovations in pancreatic anastomosis technique during pancreatoduodenectomies.胰十二指肠切除术胰腺吻合技术的创新。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Nov;405(7):1039-1044. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01942-8. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
国际研究小组(ISGPS)术后胰瘘定义与分级的2016年更新:11年后
Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):584-591. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
4
Pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: A position statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).胰十二指肠切除术后的胰腺吻合术:国际胰腺手术研究组(ISGPS)的立场声明
Surgery. 2017 May;161(5):1221-1234. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
5
Factors predicting adequate lymph node yield in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for malignancy.预测恶性肿瘤患者行胰十二指肠切除术后淋巴结清扫数量足够的因素。
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep 20;14(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-1005-3.
6
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Tumors: Does Size Matter?腹腔镜下胰腺肿瘤远端胰腺切除术:大小重要吗?
Dig Surg. 2016;33(4):290-8. doi: 10.1159/000445008. Epub 2016 May 25.
7
Single institution results of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of pancreas in 78 patients.78例胰腺体尾部腺癌患者行根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术的单中心结果。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016 Jul;23(7):432-41. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.362. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
8
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Standard Retrograde Pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS) for Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与标准逆行胰脾切除术(SPRS)治疗左侧胰腺癌的手术结果比较
World J Surg. 2016 Sep;40(9):2267-75. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3526-x.
9
The short- and long-term outcomes of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas.根治性顺行模块化胰体尾切除术治疗胰体尾腺癌的短期和长期疗效
BMC Surg. 2015 Oct 30;15:120. doi: 10.1186/s12893-015-0107-0.
10
Minimally invasive RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer within Yonsei criteria: long-term (>median 3 years) oncologic outcomes.符合延世标准的精心挑选的左侧胰腺癌的微创RAMPS手术:长期(>中位数3年)肿瘤学结局。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Oct;28(10):2848-55. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3537-3. Epub 2014 May 23.