Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan.
Department of Internal Medicine, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Auburn Hills, Michigan.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 1;93(5):1002-1023. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28146. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
Aortic stenosis (AS) has become an increasingly prevalent clinical condition, as a result of the "greying of the population", the widespread application of sophisticated diagnostic tools including non-invasive imaging and invasive techniques, and the advent of minimally invasive surgical and percutaneous valve therapies. The diagnosis of severe AS traditionally has relied on the assessment of the mean transvalvular gradient (ΔP ) and aortic valve area (AVA) by either echocardiography or catheterization. However, other hemodynamic variables as flow, pressure recovery, and jet eccentricity also play a major role in determining the final hemodynamic state of AS. Moreover, mismatch between ΔP and AVA as in low flow low gradient AS and discordance between catheterization and echocardiographic studies in grading severity of AS have increased the complexity of AS diagnosis. The present case-based treatise emphasizes a multi-modality approach to delineation of the hemodynamic pathophysiology of different AS states. KEY POINTS: Reduction in the aortic valve area, flow across the aortic valve, and direction of the aortic stenosis jet determine the pressure gradient generated across the aortic valve in patients with aortic stenosis. Discordance between echo and catheterization maximum gradients is related to the inherent temporal differences between the times of their acquisition. Discordance between echo and catheterization mean gradients is related to pressure recovery and assumptions in the application of Bernoulli equation to estimate the aortic valve gradient. Pressure recovery relates to the ratio of the aortic valve area and ascending aortic diameter as well as the jet direction. Mismatch between area and gradient criteria for aortic stenosis severity may occur with or without concordance between echocardiographic and catheterization data. Errors of measurement should be excluded prior to assuming any mismatch or discordance between the data. Area gradient mismatch occurs when the aortic valve area is in the severe range, while the gradient is in the non-severe range as in low flow low gradient aortic stenosis. Reverse area gradient mismatch occurs when the gradient is in the severe range, while the aortic valve area is in the non-severe range as in congenital aortic stenosis with an eccentric jet.
主动脉瓣狭窄 (AS) 已成为一种越来越普遍的临床病症,这是由于“人口老龄化”、包括非侵入性成像和侵入性技术在内的复杂诊断工具的广泛应用,以及微创外科和经皮瓣膜治疗的出现。严重 AS 的传统诊断依赖于通过超声心动图或心导管术评估跨瓣压差(ΔP)和主动脉瓣口面积(AVA)。然而,其他血流动力学变量,如流量、压力恢复和射流偏心度,也在确定 AS 的最终血流动力学状态方面发挥重要作用。此外,低流量低梯度 AS 中 ΔP 和 AVA 之间的不匹配以及心导管术和超声心动图研究在 AS 严重程度分级中的不一致性增加了 AS 诊断的复杂性。本案例论述强调了一种多模态方法来描绘不同 AS 状态的血流动力学病理生理学。
在主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,主动脉瓣口面积、跨主动脉瓣流量和主动脉瓣狭窄射流方向决定了跨主动脉瓣产生的压力梯度。
超声心动图和心导管术最大压差之间的差异与它们获取时间之间固有的时间差异有关。
超声心动图和心导管术平均压差之间的差异与压力恢复以及将伯努利方程应用于估计主动脉瓣梯度的假设有关。
压力恢复与主动脉瓣口面积与升主动脉直径的比值以及射流方向有关。
即使超声心动图和心导管术数据一致或不一致,也可能出现主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的面积和梯度标准不匹配。
在假设数据之间存在任何不匹配或不一致之前,应排除测量误差。
当主动脉瓣口面积处于严重范围,而梯度处于非严重范围时,如低流量低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄,会发生面积梯度不匹配。
当梯度处于严重范围,而主动脉瓣口面积处于非严重范围时,如先天性主动脉瓣狭窄伴偏心射流,会发生反向面积梯度不匹配。