• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于不一致性低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄的多模态成像:评估瓣膜和心肌

Multimodality Imaging for Discordant Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Assessing the Valve and the Myocardium.

作者信息

Guzzetti Ezequiel, Annabi Mohamed-Salah, Pibarot Philippe, Clavel Marie-Annick

机构信息

Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (Quebec Heart & Lung Institute), Quebec, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Dec 3;7:570689. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.570689. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2020.570689
PMID:33344514
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7744378/
Abstract

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a disease of the valve and the myocardium. A correct assessment of the valve disease severity is key to define the need for aortic valve replacement (AVR), but a better understanding of the myocardial consequences of the increased afterload is paramount to optimize the timing of the intervention. Transthoracic echocardiography remains the cornerstone of AS assessment, as it is universally available, and it allows a comprehensive structural and hemodynamic evaluation of both the aortic valve and the rest of the heart. However, it may not be sufficient as a significant proportion of patients with severe AS presents with discordant grading (i.e., an AVA ≤ 1 cm and a mean gradient <40 mmHg) which raises uncertainty about the true severity of AS and the need for AVR. Several imaging modalities (transesophageal or stress echocardiography, computed tomography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, positron emission tomography) exist that allow a detailed assessment of the stenotic aortic valve and the myocardial remodeling response. This review aims to provide an updated overview of these multimodality imaging techniques and seeks to highlight a practical approach to help clinical decision making in the challenging group of patients with discordant low-gradient AS.

摘要

主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)是一种累及瓣膜和心肌的疾病。准确评估瓣膜疾病的严重程度是确定是否需要进行主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的关键,但更好地了解后负荷增加对心肌的影响对于优化干预时机至关重要。经胸超声心动图仍然是AS评估的基石,因为它普遍可用,并且能够对主动脉瓣和心脏其他部分进行全面的结构和血流动力学评估。然而,它可能并不足够,因为相当一部分重度AS患者存在分级不一致的情况(即主动脉瓣口面积≤1 cm且平均压差<40 mmHg),这增加了对AS真正严重程度以及AVR必要性的不确定性。现有的几种成像方式(经食管或负荷超声心动图、计算机断层扫描、心血管磁共振、正电子发射断层扫描)能够对狭窄的主动脉瓣和心肌重塑反应进行详细评估。本综述旨在提供这些多模态成像技术的最新概述,并试图突出一种实用方法实用方法,以帮助在具有分级不一致的低压差AS这一具有挑战性的患者群体中进行临床决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ee/7744378/2785d81e2421/fcvm-07-570689-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ee/7744378/1ffa66f6c4d6/fcvm-07-570689-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ee/7744378/b4e305636542/fcvm-07-570689-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ee/7744378/c9a87419c660/fcvm-07-570689-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ee/7744378/85abe2e76ae2/fcvm-07-570689-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ee/7744378/e92f353521fc/fcvm-07-570689-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ee/7744378/0e1b6e414ba1/fcvm-07-570689-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ee/7744378/2785d81e2421/fcvm-07-570689-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ee/7744378/1ffa66f6c4d6/fcvm-07-570689-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ee/7744378/b4e305636542/fcvm-07-570689-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ee/7744378/c9a87419c660/fcvm-07-570689-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ee/7744378/85abe2e76ae2/fcvm-07-570689-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ee/7744378/e92f353521fc/fcvm-07-570689-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ee/7744378/0e1b6e414ba1/fcvm-07-570689-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ee/7744378/2785d81e2421/fcvm-07-570689-g0007.jpg

相似文献

1
Multimodality Imaging for Discordant Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Assessing the Valve and the Myocardium.用于不一致性低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄的多模态成像:评估瓣膜和心肌
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Dec 3;7:570689. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.570689. eCollection 2020.
2
Discordant Grading of Aortic Stenosis Severity: Echocardiographic Predictors of Survival Benefit Associated With Aortic Valve Replacement.主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的不一致分级:超声心动图预测主动脉瓣置换术相关生存获益的指标。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jul;9(7):797-805. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.09.026. Epub 2016 May 18.
3
Cardiac Imaging for Assessing Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis.评估轻中度主动脉瓣狭窄的心脏影像学检查。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;10(2):185-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.01.002.
4
The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study.不和谐严重钙化主动脉瓣疾病分级的复杂性:联合多普勒超声心动图和计算机断层扫描研究的新见解。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 17;62(24):2329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1621. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
5
Postoperative Reverse Remodeling and Symptomatic Improvement in Normal-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis After Aortic Valve Replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后正常血流低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的术后逆向重构及症状改善
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Dec;10(12). doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006580.
6
Imaging for Predicting and Assessing Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后人工瓣膜-患者不匹配的影像学预测和评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jan;12(1):149-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.10.020.
7
Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography for Management of Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图在低流量低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄中的应用。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Feb 6;71(5):475-485. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.052.
8
9
The Role of Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease.影像学在主动脉瓣疾病中的作用。
Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2016;9:21. doi: 10.1007/s12410-016-9383-z. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
10
How Do We Reconcile Echocardiography, Computed Tomography, and Hybrid Imaging in Assessing Discordant Grading of Aortic Stenosis Severity?如何在评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的不匹配分级中协调超声心动图、计算机断层扫描和混合成像?
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Feb;12(2):267-282. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.027.

引用本文的文献

1
Aortic Valve Calcium Score: Applications in Clinical Practice and Scientific Research-A Narrative Review.主动脉瓣钙化评分:在临床实践与科研中的应用——一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 11;13(14):4064. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144064.
2
Harnessing feature extraction capacities from a pre-trained convolutional neural network (VGG-16) for the unsupervised distinction of aortic outflow velocity profiles in patients with severe aortic stenosis.利用预训练卷积神经网络(VGG - 16)的特征提取能力,对重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的主动脉流出速度剖面进行无监督区分。
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022 Apr 22;3(2):153-168. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac004. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Multiplanar "En Face" Reconstruction of the Aortic Valve: Impact on Aortic Valve Calcium Scoring.主动脉瓣的多平面“正面”重建:对主动脉瓣钙化评分的影响
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Dec;13(12):2678-2680. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.05.021. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
2
Validation of four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance for aortic stenosis assessment.四维血流心血管磁共振评估主动脉瓣狭窄的验证。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 29;10(1):10569. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66659-6.
3
Estimation of Stroke Volume and Aortic Valve Area in Patients with Aortic Stenosis: A Comparison of Echocardiography versus Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
Peak flow measurements in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a prospective comparative study between cardiovascular magnetic resonance 2D and 4D flow and transthoracic echocardiography.
严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的峰值流量测量:心血管磁共振 2D 和 4D 流量与经胸超声心动图的前瞻性对比研究。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021 Nov 15;23(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12968-021-00825-1.
4
Aliased Flow Signal Planimetry by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Grading Aortic Stenosis Severity: A Prospective Pilot Study.心血管磁共振成像的混叠血流信号平面测量法用于评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度:一项前瞻性初步研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Oct 18;8:752340. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.752340. eCollection 2021.
超声心动图与心血管磁共振在主动脉瓣狭窄患者中估测心搏量和主动脉瓣口面积的比较。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020 Aug;33(8):953-963.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2020.03.020. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
4
Evaluation of aortic stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a systematic review & meta-analysis.使用心血管磁共振评估主动脉瓣狭窄:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Jun 15;22(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00633-z.
5
Four-dimensional-flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Aortic Valve and Thoracic Aorta.主动脉瓣和胸主动脉的四维血流磁共振成像
Radiol Clin North Am. 2020 Jul;58(4):753-763. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 May 12.
6
Transvalvular Flow, Sex, and Survival After Valve Replacement Surgery in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.跨瓣血流、性别与重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者瓣膜置换术后的生存
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Apr 28;75(16):1897-1909. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.065.
7
The evaluation of aortic stenosis, how the new guidelines are implemented across Europe: a survey by EACVI.主动脉瓣狭窄的评估,新指南在欧洲的实施情况:EACVI 的调查。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Apr 1;21(4):357-362. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa009.
8
Extracellular Myocardial Volume in Patients With Aortic Stenosis.主动脉瓣狭窄患者的细胞外心肌容积。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jan 28;75(3):304-316. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.032.
9
Baseline global longitudinal strain by computed tomography is associated with post transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes.计算机断层扫描的基线整体纵向应变与经导管主动脉瓣置换术的预后相关。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020 May-Jun;14(3):233-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.12.002. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
10
Importance of Flow in Risk Stratification of Aortic Stenosis.血流在主动脉瓣狭窄风险分层中的重要性。
Can J Cardiol. 2020 Jan;36(1):27-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.10.020. Epub 2019 Oct 25.