Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Brain Behav. 2019 Mar;9(3):e01240. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1240. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
Over the last decades, neurofeedback has been applied in variety of research contexts and therapeutic interventions. Despite this extensive use, its neural mechanisms are still under debate. Several scientific advances have suggested that different networks become jointly active during neurofeedback, including regions generally involved in self-regulation, regions related to the specific mental task driving the neurofeedback and regions generally involved in feedback learning (Sitaram et al., 2017, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18, 86).
To investigate the neural mechanisms specific to neurofeedback but independent from general effects of self-regulation, we compared brain activation as measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) across different mental tasks involving gradual self-regulation with and without providing neurofeedback. Ten participants freely chose one self-regulation task and underwent two training sessions during fMRI scanning, one with and one without receiving neurofeedback. During neurofeedback sessions, feedback signals were provided in real-time based on activity in task-related, individually defined target regions. In both sessions, participants aimed at reaching and holding low, medium, or high brain-activation levels in the target region.
During gradual self-regulation with neurofeedback, a network of cortical control regions as well as regions implicated in reward and feedback processing were activated. Self-regulation with feedback was accompanied by stronger activation within the striatum across different mental tasks. Additional time-resolved single-trial analysis revealed that neurofeedback performance was positively correlated with a delayed brain response in the striatum that reflected the accuracy of self-regulation.
Overall, these findings support that neurofeedback contributes to self-regulation through task-general regions involved in feedback and reward processing.
在过去的几十年里,神经反馈已被应用于各种研究背景和治疗干预中。尽管应用广泛,但它的神经机制仍存在争议。一些科学进展表明,不同的网络在神经反馈过程中会共同活跃,包括一般涉及自我调节的区域、与驱动神经反馈的特定心理任务相关的区域以及一般涉及反馈学习的区域(Sitaram 等人,2017 年,《自然评论神经科学》,18,86)。
为了研究神经反馈特有的神经机制,而不受自我调节一般效应的影响,我们比较了不同涉及逐渐自我调节的心理任务的大脑激活情况,这些任务在有和没有提供神经反馈的情况下使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)进行测量。十名参与者自由选择一个自我调节任务,并在 fMRI 扫描期间进行两次训练,一次有神经反馈,一次没有。在神经反馈期间,根据与任务相关的、个体定义的目标区域的活动实时提供反馈信号。在两个会话中,参与者的目标是在目标区域中达到并保持低、中或高的大脑激活水平。
在有神经反馈的逐渐自我调节过程中,皮质控制区域以及涉及奖励和反馈处理的区域的网络被激活。在不同的心理任务中,带有反馈的自我调节伴随着纹状体的激活增强。额外的时间分辨单次试验分析表明,神经反馈表现与纹状体中延迟的大脑反应呈正相关,该反应反映了自我调节的准确性。
总的来说,这些发现支持神经反馈通过涉及反馈和奖励处理的任务通用区域来促进自我调节。