Sagol Brain Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center , Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Dec 2;379(1915):20240186. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0186. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
Neurofeedback (NF) has emerged as a promising avenue for demonstrating process-related neuroplasticity, enabling self-regulation of brain function. NF targeting the amygdala has drawn attention to therapeutic potential in psychiatry, by potentially harnessing emotion-regulation processes. However, not all individuals respond equally to NF training, possibly owing to varying self-regulation abilities. This underscores the importance of understanding the mechanisms behind successful neuromodulation (i.e. capacity). This study aimed to investigate the establishment and neural correlates of neuromodulation capacity using data from repeated sessions of amygdala electrical fingerprint (Amyg-EFP)-NF and post-training functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-NF sessions. Results from 97 participants (healthy controls and post-traumatic stress disorder and fibromyalgia patients) revealed increased Amyg-EFP neuromodulation capacity over training, associated with post-training amygdala-fMRI modulation capacity and improvements in alexithymia. Individual differenaces in this capacity were associated with pre-training amygdala reactivity and initial neuromodulation success. Additionally, amygdala downregulation during fMRI-NF co-modulated with other regions such as the posterior insula and parahippocampal gyrus. This combined modulation better explained EFP-modulation capacity and improvement in alexithymia than the amygdala modulation alone, suggesting the relevance of this broader network to gained capacity. These findings support a network-based approach for NF and highlight the need to consider individual differences in brain function and modulation capacity to optimize NF interventions. This article is part of the theme issue 'Neurofeedback: new territories and neurocognitive mechanisms of endogenous neuromodulation'.
神经反馈(NF)已成为展示与过程相关的神经可塑性的一种有前途的方法,使大脑功能的自我调节成为可能。NF 靶向杏仁核,通过潜在地利用情绪调节过程,引起了精神病学治疗潜力的关注。然而,并非所有个体对 NF 训练的反应都相同,这可能是由于自我调节能力的差异。这突显出了解成功神经调节(即能力)背后的机制的重要性。本研究旨在使用重复的杏仁核电指纹(Amyg-EFP)-NF 和训练后功能磁共振成像(fMRI)-NF 会话的数据,研究神经调节能力的建立和神经相关性。来自 97 名参与者(健康对照者、创伤后应激障碍和纤维肌痛患者)的结果表明,随着训练的进行,Amyg-EFP 神经调节能力增加,与训练后杏仁核-fMRI 调节能力和述情障碍改善相关。这种能力的个体差异与训练前杏仁核反应性和初始神经调节成功相关。此外,fMRI-NF 期间的杏仁核下调与其他区域(如后岛叶和海马旁回)共同调节。这种联合调节比单独调节杏仁核更好地解释了 EFP 调节能力和述情障碍的改善,这表明该更广泛的网络与获得的能力相关。这些发现支持 NF 的基于网络的方法,并强调需要考虑大脑功能和调节能力的个体差异,以优化 NF 干预措施。本文是主题问题“神经反馈:内源性神经调节的新领域和神经认知机制”的一部分。