Testa Antonino, Schilb Mikael, Lehman Jeffrey S, Cristinzio Gennaro, Bonello Pierluigi
Institute of Biochemical Biotechnology-Programma Miur "Rientro dei Cervelli", Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Department of Life Science, Otterbein College, Westerville, Ohio and Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Plant Dis. 2005 Oct;89(10):1128. doi: 10.1094/PD-89-1128B.
During August 2003, we conducted a statewide survey of rhododendrons to determine if Phytophthora ramorum was present in Ohio ornamental nurseries. In total, 240 samples were randomly collected in 12 nurseries throughout Ohio from rhododendrons showing foliar necrotic lesions and twig dieback symptoms. The samples yielded 51 Phytophthora spp. isolates on PARP-V8 agar. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of all isolates was amplified using the universal primers ITS1 and ITS4 and was sequenced. Consensus sequences from sense and antisense were then blasted against the GenBank database, allowing for the identification to species of ˜80% of all isolates. These identifications, and the ˜20% unknowns, were confirmed using blind morphological tests on the basis of the following parameters: colony morphology; shape and dimensions of sporangia and type of papillae; dimensions of oogonia and oospores; type and position of antheridia; presence or absence of chlamydospores; presence or absence and morphology of hyphal swellings; and growth rate at 35°C according to the Revisited Tabular Key of the species of Phytophthora (1). No P. ramorum was detected among the isolates; however, P. cactorum, P. citricola, P. citrophthora, and P. nicotianae were detected. We also found two occurrences of P. inflata Caros & Tucker and one of P. insolita Ann & Ko. (P. inflata: e-value ≤e, identities ≥95%; P. insolita: e-value = 0.0; identities = 95%.) P. inflata was isolated from two tissue types, a dead twig and a necrotic leaf tip. P. insolita was isolated from a necrotic leaf tip. Identity of the two species was confirmed morphologically using the parameters listed above as well as the following measurements (N = 40; all in μm) (1): P. inflata - sporangia: 40 × 24 ([24 to 68] × [18 to 34]); oogonia: 34.6 (28 to 40); oospores: 30.8 (25 to 38); P. insolita - sporangia: 42 × 28 ([34 to 56] × [22 to 38]); oogonia: 32 (26 to 36); oospores: 26 (22 to 30). Koch's postulates were satisfied by inoculating two rhododendron plants (cvs. PJM and Nova Zembla) with the putative pathogens. On each plant, each of three leaves was pierced with a dissecting needle and was inoculated by placing a 0.5-cm-diameter plug of mycelium that was taken from the margin of a colony actively growing on PARP-V8 agar on the wound. The inoculum was retained using clear adhesive tape. A similar procedure was used for twigs. Controls consisted of inoculations with sterile PARP-V8 agar medium. Both cultures of P. inflata and P. insolita produced necrotic lesions in all inoculations on both tissue types within 1 week, and they were reisolated from the margins of lesions on PARP-V8. The lesion margin was at least 2 cm away from the inoculum plug in leaf inoculations and several centimeters in twig inoculations. To our knowledge, this is the first report of P. inflata and P. insolita occurring on rhododendron and the first time P. insolita has been reported outside of Southeast Asia where it has been recovered only from soil. Reference: (1) D. J. Stamps et al. Mycol. Pap. No. 162. CAB Int. Mycol. Inst. Wallingford, UK, 1990.
2003年8月,我们在全州范围内对杜鹃花进行了调查,以确定疫霉属的恶疫霉是否存在于俄亥俄州的观赏植物苗圃中。我们从俄亥俄州各地的12家苗圃中,随机采集了240份有叶部坏死斑和嫩枝枯死症状的杜鹃花样本。这些样本在PARP-V8琼脂培养基上分离出51株疫霉属菌株。使用通用引物ITS1和ITS4扩增所有菌株的内部转录间隔区(ITS),并进行测序。然后将正义链和反义链的一致性序列与GenBank数据库进行比对,从而鉴定出约80%的菌株种类。通过基于以下参数的盲法形态学测试,对这些鉴定结果以及约20%的未知菌株进行了确认:菌落形态;孢子囊的形状和尺寸以及乳突类型;藏卵器和卵孢子的尺寸;雄器的类型和位置;厚垣孢子的有无;菌丝膨大体的有无及其形态;以及根据《疫霉属物种修订表格检索表》(1)在35°C下的生长速率。在分离出的菌株中未检测到恶疫霉;然而,检测到了恶疫霉、柑桔疫霉、柠檬疫霉和烟草疫霉。我们还发现了两例膨胀疫霉(Caros & Tucker)和一例罕见疫霉(Ann & Ko)。(膨胀疫霉:e值≤e,同一性≥95%;罕见疫霉:e值 = 0.0;同一性 = 95%。)膨胀疫霉从两种组织类型中分离得到,一个枯死的嫩枝和一个坏死的叶尖。罕见疫霉从一个坏死的叶尖分离得到。使用上述参数以及以下测量数据(N = 40;所有数据单位均为μm)(1),从形态学上确认了这两个物种的身份:膨胀疫霉——孢子囊:40×24([24至68]×[18至34]);藏卵器:34.6(28至40);卵孢子:30.8(25至38);罕见疫霉——孢子囊:42×28([34至56]×[22至38]);藏卵器:32(26至36);卵孢子:26(22至30)。通过用假定的病原体接种两株杜鹃花植株(品种为PJM和Nova Zembla),满足了柯赫氏法则。在每株植物上,用解剖针在三片叶子上各刺一个小孔,然后通过在伤口处放置一个直径0.5厘米的菌丝体菌块进行接种,该菌块取自PARP-V8琼脂培养基上正在活跃生长的菌落边缘。用透明胶带固定接种物。对嫩枝采用类似的方法。对照由接种无菌PARP-V8琼脂培养基组成。膨胀疫霉和罕见疫霉的两种培养物在1周内对两种组织类型的所有接种都产生了坏死斑,并且从PARP-V8上的病斑边缘重新分离出了它们。在叶片接种中,病斑边缘距离接种菌块至少2厘米,在嫩枝接种中则距离数厘米。据我们所知,这是膨胀疫霉和罕见疫霉在杜鹃花上出现的首次报道,也是罕见疫霉在东南亚以外地区的首次报道,在东南亚它仅从土壤中分离得到。参考文献:(1)D. J. Stamps等人,《真菌学论文集》第162号,英国沃灵福德国际真菌研究所CAB出版社,1990年。