Felisberti Fatima M, Currie Liam
School of Behaviour and Social Sciences, Kingston University, London, UK.
Iperception. 2019 Feb 13;10(1):2041669519827974. doi: 10.1177/2041669519827974. eCollection 2019 Jan-Feb.
Visual field asymmetries in the encoding of groups of faces have rarely been investigated. Here, eye movements (percentage of dwell time [pDT] and number of fixations [nFix]) were recorded during the encoding of three groups of four faces tagged with cheating, cooperative, or neutral behaviours. Faces in each group were placed in the top left, top right, bottom left, or bottom right quadrants. Face recall was equally high in the three behavioural groups. Conversely, pDT and nFix were higher for faces in the upper hemifields. Most of the first saccades were made to the top left visual quadrant, which also commanded a higher pDT and nFix than the other quadrants. The findings are relevant to the understanding of visual field asymmetries in the processing of multiple faces, a common social scenario, and may be linked to reading habits in conjunction (or not) with cultural and environmental cues.
在对面孔组进行编码时的视野不对称情况很少被研究。在此,在对标记有欺骗、合作或中性行为的三组四张面孔进行编码期间,记录了眼动情况(注视时间百分比[pDT]和注视次数[nFix])。每组中的面孔分别放置在左上、右上、左下或右下象限。三个行为组中的面孔回忆率相同。相反,上半视野中的面孔的pDT和nFix更高。大多数首次扫视是朝向左上视觉象限,该象限的pDT和nFix也高于其他象限。这些发现与理解在处理多张面孔(一种常见的社交场景)时的视野不对称情况相关,并且可能与阅读习惯以及文化和环境线索(无论是否相关)有关。